2017 The Year of the Sony Mobile

Nintenyearolds btfo again

>>59220219
> Where is your /g/od now?
Still in China. With really cheap yet pretty powerful smartphones.

wow another phone supporting a nonfree software platform

no thanks.

>>59220219
>laughingwhores.jpg

>>59220246
It's Android man, you can see the code.

Do you guys remember Sony's old CD DRM that got deemed to be actual spyware?

Imagine running an OS made by those guys

>>59220219
ewww that design is so 2015.

>>59220285
sailfish os is not android

it's also nonfree and the jolla faggots had in the past indicated it would be entirely foss which it is not.

instead their marketing calls it 'open core' which is literally exactly like android.

it's shit, it's doa and it won't run all your faggy nonfree android apps so there is even less reason to want it.

>>59220219
now as long as they come out with the new X at ifa that has the hdr screen from the premium @ 1080 and the new camera, im sold.

File: Sony-Xperia-XZ-Main[1].jpg (33KB, 900x778px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 900x778px

>>59220237

pretty logical, although I would prefer the Jap botnet to the chink botnet; if i had to make a choice.

File: 1443789258059.jpg (86KB, 422x768px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 422x768px

>official sailfish rom
bretty good

File: 1038012093[1].jpg (70KB, 1000x541px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 1000x541px

>>59220325

https://techcrunch.com/2016/11/29/jollas-sailfish-os-now-certified-as-russias-first-android-alternative/

Putin approved, freetards btfo!

>>59220325
>hurt feelings

>>59220506
so russians were bribed enough to stamp it ok?

that means what exactly?

it's still a nonfree botnet piece of shit like all of android's "core"

Are any of the new smartphones genuinely waterproof this time around?

Regards disappointed Xperia Z5 Compact owner.

>>59220306

>Imagine running an OS made by those guys

at worst, wouldn't make much difference than running an OS made by (((google))) f@m.

File: 58b5751240201118a0146497[1].jpg (15KB, 630x444px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 630x444px

>>59220607

XZs and XZ premium are waterproof. the regular XZ should also be waterproof too.

if you are a compact series guy though, X compact is not. sony only offers water/dust proofing for the flagship phones for now.

>>59220905
I'll come back another time when hopefully Sony wakes up.

I doubt it

They'll probably screw up something with the camera software (again)

The upcoming Compact probably won't have flagship specs or something missing

>>59220593
It means your fake news now shut ur nigger ass up faget