>AMD lost it wasn't supposed to end this way bro's

>>59219695
INTEL SHILL

>>59219695
So pretty much from looking at all of the reviews ive read so far ryzen isn't worth it if you're playing at 1080p but 1440p and higher resolutions the performance is at or above the t 7700k/6900k, I don't see the problem with this? Why would you buy a $300+ cpu then pair it with a gpu only capable of playing at 1080p? lol

>>59219753
FUCK OFF POO SHILL

File: the-worst-flight-in-movie-history_ph88.jpg (28KB, 610x406px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 610x406px

Their r7 series is offering a productivity CPU that shits on intel for a fraction of the cost while maintaining 90% of performance in games.

Their r5 series ryzen will offer similar game performance, 90% of kaby without having to buy a core gimped pentium, for a fraction of the price of 7700k

AMD is a major value proposition win for new builds but likely not enough to upgrade from existing current gaming builds but productivity wise? Yes.

Ryzen is exactly what I thought it would be. Competitive and that's all a brand spankin' new gen 1 architecture needs to be in order to win.

File: INTEL BTFO.png (245KB, 800x612px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 800x612px

>>59219753
DELET THIS