Thread replies: 5
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
Anonymous
Cool Internet Tricks 2017-03-03 06:07:13 Post No. 59212939
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Cool Internet Tricks 2017-03-03 06:07:13 Post No. 59212939
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: gentoo.png (543B, 60x98px) Image search:
[Google]
543B, 60x98px
Post cool internet tricks.
You can store images inside html text files.
http://tools.dynamicdrive.com/imagetobase64/
for example:
http://pastebin.com/NfBAgA21
>>
Ye olde JS "webiste hack"
I learned about this when I was a skiddie, still pretty cool
> copy the following:
> javascript:document.body.contentEditable='true';document.designMode='on';void 0;
> enable JS
> paste into URL bar
> website is editable
Not the best, but it's the first thing that came to mind
>>
>>59213924
That's barely anything. With firefox's and chrome's inspect element tools you can just edit the source directly and have it rendered for you.
>>
>>59213975
You don't edit the source directly with inspect element. One refresh and it's gone.
>>
File: hackerman.png (2MB, 1265x834px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 1265x834px
>>59213975
Literally everyone I show this to brings this up. The JavaScript method is superior for many reasons;
1. You can turn it into a bookmart and have a handy button
2. There's no bot-generated HTML to wade through
3. You can edit the page directly, like a Word document
4. There's no bot-generated HTML to wade through
5. Normies will fear your power to a larger degree (I admit this one is slightly debatable)
6. There's no bot-generated HTML to wade through
7. There's no sidebar
Thread posts: 5
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2