G502 or G900 mouse & why?

The g402 really is such a cute mouse.

>>59210508
I prefer my G900 over my 502 simply because of the side buttons. You can have all four active at once which is really nice and surprisingly usable. Mechanically they are the same though, or I can't really tell the difference in any case. And then there is the added benefit of wireless on top of that, which is why I bought it in the first place. Again I couldn't tell any immediate difference between the two, the wireless function on the G900 works just as well as the wired function on itself or the 502, which is nice. And the G900 looks way better to me, more aggressive without the added and unwanted blue accent on the 502.

>>59210508

502 all the way.
Wireless suck in many ways

>>59210627
No lol

>>59210577
>you can have all four active at once
as different buttons, or do they just duplicate keys?

I think the 900 is a bit larger than the 502 which might be a selling point for me since
>pinky drag

File: 1477126568292.jpg (86KB, 562x787px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 562x787px

>>59210508

hideous design

>>59210508
G403

>>59210627
Wrong.

Go check detailed benchmarks, the g900 has less latency in wireless mode than the g502 :)

>>59210663
You can set them for shortcuts or keys. I use number pad binds for gaming which are shared with the side buttons. Their location, for me at least is superior as I don't have to move my fingers at all.

>>59210508
Neither. Get the G102 and stop buying heavy mice

>>59210508
out of those 3 i prefer the g502
i went to the g502 after my g9's wire crapped out
its not as good because its not big enough to be comfortable
i prefer a mouse with weight to it and the adjustable weight in the g502 was a up for me

i tried one of the corsair mouse that were similar to the g9 in size, but the buttons were stiff

G600. When are they making an update?

>>59210508
U G L Y
G
L
Y