AMD Ryzen DOA; 1800X a mere 7% faster than Intel Pentium G4560

when will amd go bankrupt?

>>59209739
I love how amdrones keep changing the narrative.
LOL, it's bulldozer all over again.

>>59209859
>m-muh binning! The x chips are going to be binned so high! I know because I have common sense!

>price tiers are always like this! i-it's a halo product!

>>59209787
Hopefully fucking soon

I am tired of the idiots shilling this crap every time there is a new AMD launch, then it inevitably fails disastrously

File: 1488428278854.jpg (396KB, 512x949px) Image search: [Google]

396KB, 512x949px

>>59209859
AMD hasn't changed a bit

>>59209883

Yeah fuck AMD I hope they go bankrupt so Intel can forever fuck us in the ass with marginal gains and inflated prices!!

>muh gaymen processors

grow up kiddos, Ryzen is just starting and already btfo all of intel

>>59210196
If AMD fails, Intel gets broken up due to monopoly laws. It's the best thing that could happen for consumers.

File: 1428680932054.jpg (15KB, 689x534px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 689x534px

>>59210605

DIS DIS DIS


MADSHILLS are fuckin cancerous because they keep brain-dead company on life support until FULLY BANKRUPT...

>>59209897
Kek

>>59210605
>>59212867
>Implying they wouldnt just work together anyway giving no competition but raping consumers anyway just like American isps

>>59213280
They can't do that bud
ISPs don't have a monopoly either, they have oligopolies set in contracts which are legal if there is financial benefits for city wide areas

>>59213280
They can't, read about monopoly laws

>>59210605
>implying intel wouldn't just claim that ARM/Qualcomm is their main competitor

Hell, the ISPs get away with a literal monopoly by claiming that DSL and cell phone internet are viable competition in their market.

>>59210605
Wrong, they'll say ARM is their competitor and then proceed to rape your ass without lube

Jim Keller more like Jim Can't Save AMD

>>59213332
>>59213323
Just like how Intel was supposed to pay AMD for the shit they pulled right?>>59213334

>>59213408
That was bad and you should feel bad anon..

>>59213408
Jim Keller more like Jim Killer of Stock Prices

>>59209739
Well the 7700k beats the 6900k at gaming too, but the 6900k costs 3x the price.

What exactly is your point? Multicore processors tend not to do as well in single threaded applications.