Whatever happened to GNU Hurd?

>>59207812
It's under development.

>>59207812
Vaporware
The methodical masturbation of an aging ideologue

>>59207812
It's a good idea that's hard to implement efficiently.
There is no successful microkernel in existence,
apart from maybe some niche solutions in high security environments.

More like GNU Turd amirite?

>>59207812
>hurd dur

>>59207965
>It's a good idea that's hard to implement efficiently.
>There is no successful microkernel in existence

This. Also Linux made it entirely superfluous and unneeded

>>59207812
Mach being slow shit and Linux happened. The former retarded its development, the latter made it redundant before it matured. The architecture is not really interesting enough to justify not using Linux instead.

>>59207965
>There is no successful microkernel in existence,
>apart from maybe some niche solutions in high security environments.
QNX was pretty general-purpose, even had a web browser.

>>59207812
>freetards have to admit it's Linux that powers the GNU userland, not the other way around like they always pretend

>>59207812
https://www.debian.org/ports/hurd/