I think there are still some optimizations for GCC and Michael should have used Kernel 4.11.
Here the benchs: https://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=24219
>>59201580
Kernel compilation
>>59201580
>4.11
latest is 4.10.1, but him using 4.9 just shows how fucking retarded he his
>>59201620
But he used 4.10.0-9, not 4.9.
Nothing really new since gcc isn't favorable to Intel
>>59201580
>>59201596
This really shows what a beast Ryzen is when you utilize all the cores. Perf/clock is incredible.
>>59201580
But I can't play games on Linux.
>>59202353
Yeah but muh games muh /v/
>>59202367
Just use KVM!
Go back to >>>/v/ manchild.
BUT MAY GAEMS
>>59201580
why the fuck does it ship in a wooden crate?
When did /g/ become /v\? I mean, this thread has not as many replies as a gaming benchmark thread, still the sticky has Stallman and we are supposed to be informed tech users...
>>59202679
/g/ has been /v/eddit 2.0 since fucking always
What on earth are you on about?
>>59202516
What is known about ryzen and virtualization?
>>59201620
How is the version he uses relevant? He's building the same sources on all processors.
>>59202679
since the start.
>>59202798
It's a x86 CPU with IOMMU support.
The End
Absolutely crushing it (the the Xeon E3's are the closest equivelants of Intel desktop lineup)
>>59203138
Those are not games
>>59203164
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9McGKrxOnB8
>>>/v/
>>59203187
Nobody needs that shit everyone plays games
>Here is the cool part for those programmers reading, 8 core/ 16 thread Ryzen 7 1700X is equivalent to $730-$770/ month of AWS compute using the c4.4xlarge and c4.8xlarge instances as guideposts.
>>59203164
Do you want to see the GPU bottlenecked results where intel and amd are on par or the sligthly worse amd results at 768p?
>>59201580
They only thing i want to see is single core performance benchmark :)
>>59203187
>advertise it as a gaming CPU
>it sucks for gaming
>>59203220
You gaymen children don't have money for a $500 gaming CPU much less $1000 unless you steal your mom's credit card.
>>59203262
>advertise it as a gaming CPU
source?
>>59203280
>>59203220
>everyone plays games
Speak for yourself manchild
>>59203306
>mane
>>>/mlp/
>>59203337
kek
>>59203262
Except it doesn't
video games fgt
>>59203306
Terrible marketing, as expected of AMD.
Good thing it does real good at workstation work, even against a 6950X in some cases.
>>59201580
Cryptography perf seems to be nice, like real nice, must fit in the caches.
>>59203262
>complains about ryzen 7 for not being as good for gaming
>ignores the fact they still haven't shown off their quad core lineup