lol
Get REKT AMD
>>59200895
/g/ - Video Games
>>59200973
>Having to go for a literally nobody fatass youtube to get the results you actually want to see not the real results
you are just searching for benchmarks that fit your narrative, meanwhile the majority of benchmarks show the exact opposite of this
Instead of thinking "Hm this one review is different than these other twenty, I guess it's wrong
your dumbass thinks "Hm this one review is difference from these other twenty, those other twenty are fishy shills grr jews"
>>59200973
there is a reason nobody subscribes to joker
literally every one of his benchmarks from GPUs to CPUs are always wrong
>>59200895
>The human eye can't see past 240 fps
>don't mind me guys just getting rekt by a $300 CPU
>>59201073
>4k benchmarks
wow they are really trying hard to cover up Ryzen as a failure
>>59201108
4k is the future anon. Still coming here for a while I know /g/ is hardly cutting edge when it comes to tech.
>>59201169
That's not the point
4k doesn't stress the CPU as much as 1080p does
4k is the future but so are high framerates, and high framerates require CPU power