What is this

>>59199350
A benchmark where Intel gets utterly BTFO, therefore it's irrelevant.

Buy our latest i7, good goy.

File: amd.png (4KB, 419x39px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 419x39px

>>59199350
what is this

>>59199567
TUMBLING DOWN, TUMBLING DOWN

File: IT ALL RETURNS TO NOTHING.png (32KB, 656x497px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 656x497px

>>59199567
i duno lol

>>59199567
That's not a tumble. Nvidia lost over 10% in a day a few days ago.

It will rally when the sales numbers come in. It's still 8c/16t for $329. They'll sell out for hobbyists that also like to game and OEMs selling workstations.

>This is the latest version of the self-penned 3DPM benchmark. The goal of 3DPM is to simulate semi-optimized scientific algorithms taken directly from my doctorate thesis. Version 2.1 improves over 2.0 by passing the main particle structs by reference rather than by value, and decreasing the amount of double->float->double recasts the compiler was adding in. It affords a ~25% speed-up over v2.0, which means new data.

>>59200354
Ian confirmed for AMD shill by running benchmarks on his own program

>>59199529
Yes. This is Palestinian propaganda. Please ignore it and buy Intel.