AMD R7 1800x *OR* i7 6900k

6900K if you really need 256-bit AVX bandwidth. Otherwise, 1800x.

>>59198082
Just pay $1000 you can do it.

>>59198082
There aren't any benchmarks, you fucking faggot. The NDA hasn't even lifted yet.

File: DOA_2.png (264KB, 1087x2728px) Image search: [Google]

264KB, 1087x2728px

>>59198082
Why don't you take a look in this pic related?

Ryzen BTFO

>>59198082
>cant trust benchmarks either
the ones that will come out in 2 minutes? are you from the future?

>>59198148
well there are the ones from the Ryzen promotion and such, and then u have few like from UserBenchmark, or wccftech.com

>>59198082
>>59198146
Your samefagging attempt is transparent. "le $1,000 chip is beaten by le $500 chip le meme".
Literally nobody in /g/ ever bought a $1,000 chip.
The 4/8 Intels is the sweet spot of intels.
Talk about 4/8 and 6/12 AMDs.

>>59198414
yes, well, I didnt ask about 4/8 cpus did I...

do you guys think that Ryzen having dual-channel mem. will be a disadvantage againts the 4ch of 6900k?

>>59198082
>$1000
>Instant Ramen for a month
Pick one

>>59198504
4ch would be useful for ASIC calculations such as AES or SHA-1 but not that for normal tasks.

File: Faildozer2.0_2.png (60KB, 1052x846px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 1052x846px

>>59198082
this pic related is the end of AyyMD

ok, thx for your replies ...

>>59198618
I think Ill take the Ramen

>>59198708
this is exactly what Im talking about, some benchmarks place 1800x above 6900k, and some (like this one) show otherwise

>>59198796
Optimization is the difference. AMD has been lagging behind for so long that most software is optimized for Intel, but not AMD.
>>59198419

>>59198160
>Ryzen beating intel in all the categories that matter

Yea, sure, shill.

>>59198796
>>59198845
>>59198708
>1280x768 resolution

A ton of early benchmarks are showing Ryzen placing low or behind by using stupidly low resolutions. You bump it up to 1080p and up, an the difference it is usually 1-2FP--otherwise negligible.

Thanks for falling for Intel's shady propaganda.

>>59198082

>buy a 1700
>make overclock

Done. You have a 1800X.

yea, but as >>59198845 said -- optimalization also plays a big role, which would be one reason I waver from buying Ryzen

>>59198082
>same performance pretty much
>one is $1050
>another is $500

gee, hard choice isn't it

>>59198708
Is that Witcher 3 at 1999 resolutions? Fucking kids. I swear.

>>59199809
but how come that at lower resolutions is AMD weaker and higher not?