Brace yourselves for impact. Bulldozer 2.0 confirmed

File: amdloo.png (316KB, 882x758px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 882x758px

>>59198035
SIR PLEASE

>1800x on par with 6900k on fire strike
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH intel cucks BTFO

HOLY FUCKING SHIT!!!! WTF AMD?!?!?!?! IT'S LITERALLY PENTIUM 3 PERFORMANCE!!!! WHAT WERE THEY THINKING???!!!!

File: DOA_2.png (264KB, 1087x2728px) Image search: [Google]

264KB, 1087x2728px

>>59198056
>>59198092
wanna see more?

File: HAHAHAHAHAHAHA_DOA.jpg (54KB, 667x583px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 667x583px

>>59198136
OOPS.

File: GET_REKT_RYZEN.png (202KB, 668x549px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 668x549px

>>59198188

File: piledriverwhat.png (156KB, 667x394px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 667x394px

>muh 52% IPC

PILEDRIVER ALL OVER

File: DOA_3.png (48KB, 596x767px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 596x767px

CINEBENCH

File: DOA_4.png (117KB, 667x408px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 667x408px

>>59198035

Bloodbath over here

Sir, my friend, please do the needful and delete this my friend.

File: Bulldozer2.0.png (114KB, 666x346px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 666x346px

shit chip for gaymen

>>59198625
This website is 18+ anyway.

File: Faildozer2.0.jpg (114KB, 639x596px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 639x596px

cancel pre-orders now guys

File: Faildozer2.0_2.png (60KB, 1052x846px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 1052x846px

I'm laughing right now

>>59198035
If the price drop in the 200-300 dollar range, I'll buy one.
but ~400 shekels for that? Fuck no.
Street-shitting pajeet disappointed us once again.

File: ipc_2004_to_ryzen.jpg (45KB, 580x365px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 580x365px

Something doesn't seem right about these benchmarks.

Zen was at worst supposed to be like 5% behind in IPC compared to kabby lake.

>>59198676
This is the strangest one right now. No way AMD's own bulldozer could outrun zen even at 5GHz.

Either AMD fucked up somewhere real bad or intel is is artificially making AMD processors perform bad through compilers.

>>59198676
kek

I was expecting to be slower than it should on games... but not this much

File: Faildozer2.0_3.png (302KB, 1606x2160px) Image search: [Google]

302KB, 1606x2160px

SAD!

Not only rushing around downloading these images, but renaming every single one as well.

LMAOing at your life, fampai.

File: amdthrash#12.png (76KB, 997x743px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 997x743px

P-PLEASE THEY WILL FIX IT! DON'T RELEASE REVIEWS YET!

Serious talk can we just perma ban all fucking AMD niggers on this board? If you got an AMD hardware you shouldn't be allowed to post.

You don't contribute to quality of the board (Rampant shitposting we had for last 2 weeks made by AMD shills)

You hold hardware development back by buying inferior garbage that then has to be supported for years.

You're literally a worthless human being if you own AMD and you're pathetic enough that you need to save $50 and cheap out on a purchase you only make once every 2-5 years. Please can we just ask Hiro if he can implement hardware check and auto-ban every AMD owner?

File: promised bait.png (137KB, 1344x756px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 1344x756px

>>59198243
>A FUCKING NOTEBOOK PROCESSOR OUTPERFORMING INTEL'S $1000 DOLLAR PROCESSOR

MCFUCKING KILL YOURSELF WITH YOUR SHITTY GRAPHS SHILL

Oh god, I'm fucking dying.

The AMD shills ASSURED ME they wouldn't have shitty core performance again.

File: 1481675818793.jpg (9KB, 210x251px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 210x251px

I can't wait to build my RYZEN system and play my favorite vidyagayme CINEBENCH R15

Why is the gaming performance so fucky? Memory?

They can fix this shit with bios updates r-right?

File: 1482606469126.jpg (71KB, 552x661px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 552x661px

NO

THIS WAS SUPPOSED TO BE OUR YEAR

>>59198888

>shilling jewtel helps advance technology
>i like having my asshole raped every year for shekels for no performance advancement

you are the cancer shill, fuck off

File: Faildozer2.0_4.png (121KB, 666x289px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 666x289px

>>59198885
:^)

free bench for you sir.

>>59198647
Good thing all the anime loving pedophiles are allowed

File: Faildozer2.0_5.png (372KB, 1421x813px) Image search: [Google]

372KB, 1421x813px

Everybody sell your AMD stocks right now! it's going to get ugly!

File: 1429177114622.jpg (12KB, 258x245px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 258x245px

>falling for the AyyMD meme

>>59198888
>You hold hardware development back by buying inferior garbage that then has to be supported for years.
Are you for real? The lack of a serious competitor is what is killing hardware development.
We need AMD back in the game so Intel has to go back to work and produce good processor with a ~20% performance improvement every iteration or two.
>inb4 muh AMDRONE
I buy intel and will continue until some serious competitor shows its head.

File: PoorTwitchStreamers.png (695KB, 622x583px) Image search: [Google]

695KB, 622x583px

http://www.pcgamer.com/the-amd-ryzen-7-review/

HAHAHAHA

rev up those anti-depressants

File: RYZEN7-1800X-48.jpg (114KB, 614x400px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 614x400px

welp

>>59198035
Jesus christ the samefagging is hitting hard in this thread.

>>59199264
>s-stop posting these benchmarks s-samefag!

HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAH

GUYS GUYS I KNOW WHATS WRONG
RYZEN HAS MORE L1 CACHE SOME DATAS DONT ALIGN WELL AND CACHE MISSES BREAK THE GAME

>>59199264
see >>59198056

>>59198647
The average gamer is in their 20s or 30s.

File: Faildozer2.0_8.jpg (33KB, 667x453px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 667x453px

even i3 can keep up with $500 Ryzen kek

File: Faildozer2.0_9.png (56KB, 573x552px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 573x552px

Horrible, just horrible!

File: xHUQq2Q.jpg (63KB, 636x448px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 636x448px

>AMD GPU launch
>all the benchmarks use an Intel CPU so that the CPU isn't the bottleneck

>AMD CPU launch
>all the benchmarks use an Nvidia GPU so that the GPU isn't the bottleneck

>>59199461
But AMD wants GPU bottlenecked games to hide the disappointing results

File: Faildozer2.0_10.png (76KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 600x450px

Oh boy

>>59199405
confirmed rigged benchmarks

If you buy the 1800x, you're a retarded normalfag cunt. It only overclocks to 4-4.1GHz. The 1700 overclocks to 3.8-3.9GHz. You're spending $180 more on a 200MHz overclock.

File: Faildozer2.0_12.png (71KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 600x450px

Well I thought Ashes of Singularity is AMD's friend

>>59198035
>AMD + nvidia

That is just asking for driver problems among other issues.

>>59198035

Not even close bro


It is really Phenom II launch

>>59199679
>6900K beats 7700K
totally legit

>>59199732
that's one of those rare games that use multiple cores

File: 1488214449937.png (143KB, 292x380px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 292x380px

>was an AMD shill up until now
>called intel shills kikes and jews
>reviews come out
>extremely disappointed
If the RAM and SMT affecting fps issues aren't fixed by next month, I'll just get a 7700k and OC it to 4.8 - 5GHz. God, I'm disappointed.

File: amd.png (42KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 653x726px

>>59199698
>phenom2 lacks sse4
> zen avx is dual 128bit because smaller than true 256bit
Really makes you think. But hey its ich is soldered.

File: Faildozer2.0_14.png (74KB, 601x830px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 601x830px

fucking hack

>>59198803
Yup sure all fake benchmarks right yeah super fishy
it was never 5% behind kabby lake, literally just lies AMDumbfucks made up

>>59198035
>8GB x4
vs
>8GB x2
Nice b8 m8 I r8 8/8/8/8.

File: IMG_0370.jpg (96KB, 297x405px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 297x405px

>>59198924

File: Faildozer2.0_15.png (397KB, 591x481px) Image search: [Google]

397KB, 591x481px

Congrats AMD for catching up with Sandy Bridge level

>>59199190
>Ryzen
It's great if you spend all your time in handbrake

>>59199788
I feel exactly the same.
Good thing is at least the 7700k price is dropping.

>>59199622
All these scores are maxed out, meaning the bottle neck is not the CPU

>>59198803
There's other results that show the 1800X within 3% or winning in the same games.

Wildly different methodologies, some possibly having motherboards that need a BIOS update, etc.

Benchmarks are all over the place.

>>59198225
>>59198888
Like these two both do Ashes, but one is over double the FPS and a much smaller gap.

Lots of reviewers say there are obvious issues in their tests but are posting results anyway like Gamer's Nexus, which is most of what the shills are spamming.

File: 1467055276405.jpg (26KB, 251x242px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 251x242px

>>59198924

AHAHAHA

SAVAGE

>>59199788
>want the fastest CPU for the best price $300
>don't want to support a monopoly

What the fuck even do at this point reeeeeeeee

>>59199774
Then 1800X would have been on top dipshit

File: Faildozer2.0_16.png (79KB, 1302x2013px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 1302x2013px

even i5-2600k is still strong

>>59199834
>inb4 Novideo detects the AMD CPU and runs at 90% speed

>>59200000

>>59200024
When Amd drivers detects your full setup is AMD it runs at 50% speed so you have time to appreciate every frame.

File: Unbenannt.png (9KB, 629x152px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 629x152px

>>59199804
some german papers say that ryzen don't use the GPU properly on FHD
between 40-60% in DX11 and
50-70% in DX12 while the 7700K uses
70-90% in DX11 and
80-100% in DX12

can anyone confirm?

>>59199804
wtf...

File: Faildozer2.0_17.png (47KB, 680x628px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 680x628px

just buy used chip

RYZEN IS DOA
SELL YOUR STOCKS NOW. AMD STOCKS ARE GOING BACK TO SINGLE DIGITS SCREECAP THIS

>>59198676
>1280x720 resolution

>>59199977
Who cares! Its fun bashing AMDards:D

It's becoming more and more clear that Ryzen is a CPU for the professional. Considering that I don't game much but video edit and render a lot, it still seems like a better choice.

>>59200093
I remember this dipshit tripfag was telling me how Ryzen was going to be better than Intel CPUs in games. Oh man I am fucking laffin today kiddo

File: Faildozer2.0_18.jpg (36KB, 619x352px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 619x352px

>>59200111
it cancels out GPU bottlenecking so yeah.


THIS IS THE REAL DEAL

pic related

>>59200138
I never said that but everything pointed to zen being very close to kabby lake in terms of IPC.

Something isn't right with these benchmarks and you know it.

DAMN AMD POWER IN EXCEL
>muh 95W

File: TOOHOTFORTHIS.png (75KB, 1302x2013px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 1302x2013px

>>59200227
forgot pic

So funny that these benchmark websites just post FPS when games are not indicative of real life workloads that Ryzen is displaying. You can't even measure performance in FPS.

All my AMD computers just run smoother than Intel.

>>59200247
AMD = TRAIN WRECK

>>59200271
Why do you shitpsoters have this retarded spacing?

Why

do

this?

i7-6900k has worse result than 6850k,
6850k costs $620, 6900k costs $1050
hm

>>59200164
Just by looking at that Kaby/Skylake wins IPC by around ~7-8% when at equal clocks.

DESU biggest dissapointment for I think most people is the fact that Ryzen does not overclock for shit. If it would clock around 4.4GHz It would be a plenty of an upgrade for me. I guess I'll just stick with my 3570k @ 4,4GHz untill they fix SMT bugs and maybe release the 6 core SKUs which should overclock higher.

File: 1487186720824.jpg (145KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 1280x720px

As an AMD guy I was expecting single threaded performance to be meh desu.

Their IPC is decent but their clocks are low. They can match Intel's low clocked 8 core CPU but they get rekt by higher clocked 4 core CPUs in single threaded performance.

>>59199984
Looks like a good time to take a break from /g/ for a week. Be back when this blows over some.

>>59200138
did you see the picture? booth are OC'd to the max and run the same FPS while ryzen don't even reach 90% on any thread, while the 7700K is full loaded. launch a streaming/recording software and the framerate will drop on the intel like shit

File: PLEASE.jpg (29KB, 600x315px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 600x315px

>>59198035

STOP IT

File: 1488473120132.png (191KB, 1608x1136px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 1608x1136px

>>59201064
NO

>>59201333
what the fuck? the thumbnail is fucked up.