/script>
LONGER PIPELINE
MORE GIGAHURTS
INTEL HOUSEFIREEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSS
>>59195612
Does it use less power because the performance is so bad?
>>59195612
amd is running at like 3.2ghz while intel is at 4.2.
>>59195688
>performance is so bad
>better perf/watt than every intel chip
>>59195612
>Less power consumption
>Still hotter than your average consumer Intel CPU
???
>>59195806
>>Still hotter than your average consumer Intel CPU
LMAO @ INTEL HOUSEFIRES
>>59195688
>using the same benchmark that used 2133 memory
Intel shills are getting desesperate
>>59195795
>performance is so bad
>better perf/watt than every intel chip
>>twice the cores and cache
really makes ya think
>>59195688
>Intel
No thanks I don't want my house to explode.
Who cares about power, Intel is faster at 768p gaming
>>59195837
Yeah it does considering that's what Intel's been aiming for in the last 5 generations.
>>59196110
Are Intelfags so poor they game on 2006 netbook-tier resolutions?
>>59196110
>Retard still doesn't know how to read a chart
Makes me doubt AMD's shills knowledge about anything.
http://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-7-1700x-delivered-early-benchmarks/
Intel gets BTFO
>Intel goons on high-alert
>Intel CEO on suicide watch
>Intel let a company one millionth their size beat them on almost every level
>This is the super bowl all over again
>Are you fucking kidding me
>>59196170
Whats a superowl?
>>59196185
Some murrifat tradition with a stadium of sweaty nonathletic men watching sweaty atheltic men touch eachother.
>>59195795
>>better perf/watt than every intel chip
No one gives a fuck. It doesn't affect your power bill this much at this level. Like 10c a day at the most, you spent $3.50 more a year on power! How terrible!