F

>>59195419
I, too, will shitpost in addition to OP's shitpost too as well

>>59195419
get me in the screencap

File: ryzen-doa.jpg (386KB, 1301x739px) Image search: [Google]

386KB, 1301x739px

>>59195419
Meanwhile in reality

File: 11221465_1053662007988989_1120829154527193369_n.jpg (20KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 320x320px

I cant into photoshop, someone edit this with a 1080ti

File: HAHAHAH.png (22KB, 981x221px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 981x221px

F

>>59195704
>childrens games
>reality
pick one

The real question:

Which will open Emacs faster?

>>59195735
900 series confirmed for GIMPED AND DEAD

I'd feel sorry for the cucks who bought them but they should have known what nvidia does with old gens

>>59195730
>Le doter edits

>>59195849
AMDtard logic at its finest

>>59195419
Small difference:
1. Intel sat on it's ass for about as long as AMD haven't turned out anything new, and are now eating shit.
2. Nvidia kept pressing regular increases in speed, not spectacular ones, but they didn't have to rebrand the same cards several times.
AMD didn't lapse in this field, they simply weren't competitive.

>>59196027
>960 cant play literally anything now with texture detail more than low with its 2gb VRAM
kek

>>59195849
This update also includes Maxwell you brain dead subhuman street shitter.

980 Ti is still frame for frame as good as 1070 while OCing better.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djg544J9BUk

You retards never learn. Nvidia is for superior Aryans.

>>59195730
Fuck off facebook shitstain

>>59196166
Yeah, too bad that most people bought 4GB versions that were slightly more expensive.

File: ew2x9XB-1140x641[1].jpg (111KB, 1140x641px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 1140x641px

>>59195704
Meanwhile in reality
http://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-7-1700x-delivered-early-benchmarks/

Captcha = Game Insufilme

>>59196215
Where's your Tesla card cunt?

>>59195419
Nice mobile CPU you have there

I'm not a gaymer, I'm straight. AMD doesn't have the tools for their GPUs comparable in possibilities and coveninece to CUDA for example cuDNN or cuFFT.

File: 1464065093673.png (230KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 640x360px

AMD? What are you... poor

>>59195419

Shall we wait how the consumer units ACTUALLY perform?

>>59195704
>sand nigger moon runes
ALLAHU AKBAR

>>59196748
The more something costs the better it is, of course goyim.

>>59199463

It is. Look at the Intel i7-6950X.

>>59196467
>what's OpenGL/CL
Kill yourself

>>59200005

irrelevant

>>59199463
>The more something costs the better it is, of course goyim.
Are you implying that there isn't a correlation there? Obviously it's not strictly true, but you can't seriously tell me that higher quality doesn't generally require higher cost

>>59200088
no you nigger higher quality production could cost 100 but for consumer/buy they could reduce that price at the making and charge you 1000 if they want Because shills like you Don't know what they buy and go without saying anything

>>59200000

>>59200560
>could

>>59195704
>it's matched with Intel at 1080
thanks for showing me reality

>>59195735
http://wccftech.com/nvidia-geforce-directx-12-gpu-driver-gtx-1080-ti-pascal/

This says the gain is only for direct x 12 games. It lists like 5.

>>59195791
The reality is most people who care about processors in this range are gamers. Ryzen has 16 threads and thus greater longevity potential, but Intel CPUs perform better. Everyone else either works for a company or really wants that extra half a second in 7zip.

File: WHENWILLTHEYLEARN2.jpg (2MB, 2000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2000x2000px

>>59199241

File: 307.png (74KB, 400x236px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 400x236px

>>59195419

Friends...... I was going make an 1800X build... Do I just buy a 7700K instead?

File: ayyMD.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>59195419
Living example of how annoying AMD cunts were for the last month. Where are you now OP huh? Oh that's right, licking wounds on /r/AMD.

File: ryzen DOA fallout 4.png (74KB, 601x830px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 601x830px

>>59206548

pic related

File: ryzen btfo by $70 cpu.jpg (14KB, 400x152px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 400x152px

>>59206548

This TRIGGERS MADSHILLS

>>59206548
Only if you want your your next processor after that one to be from intel and to cost three times more with 5%+ performance.

test

>>59206628
Post context please because that pentium is BTFOing a core i3. By this logic there's no more reason to buy any high end intel chip anymore and a pentium or an A10 would be enough.

File: AMlosi.jpg (259KB, 670x768px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 670x768px

>>59206634

Most of us had enough of waiting. Get Samsung to buy AMD now!

>>59196748
>AMD has processors with good performance/price ratio but that are a bit slower than the top intel models which are very expensive and hardly anyway will buy anyway.
>The difference between the intel's top models and the AMD
>"lol Are you a poorfag? You need more than what AMD offers. Intel has the bet top processor therefore you should buy intel even if you ain't gonna buy their top models".
>AMD launches Ryzen.
>Top end models beats intel in most tasks while being cheaper.
>More computational power while being a better offer than what intel used to have.
>"lol you don't need more than what intel offers."
>"My crystal ball tells me that programs or games will never use more than 4 cores. Settle for a 4 core cpu."
>"The proof is this specific kind of task (games not prepared to use more than 4 threads for example). Therefore multithreading is a meme."
>"AMD has been hyping their expensive processors that are not that good in games anyway."
>"Buy instead a pentium processor, it performs the same as the expensive Ryzen anyway."
- How does this logic works?.
- Now Intel users hates AMD users because they're richfags?.
- This people basically accepted in those threads that they hyped and recommended Intel's expensive core i7/i5 processors as an argument to not buy amd when a pentium is more than enough for the tasks "that matters" anyway making moot their own initial point?
- Are this people not even aware of the efforts to implement better multithreading in different tasks including videogames?.
How many of you have noticed all this fallacies and backpedalling coming from these people? are we being telemarketed?

>>59206675
>Most of us had enough of waiting.
Waiting for what? AMD is finally delivering good performance that worths to buy. Aren't intelfags the one begging "Just stick with your old intel processor, 4 cores is enough" and "a pentium is enough"? so why wait? intelfags are still waiting a significant reason to upgrade for years anyway.

>>59206939
>amd finally reaches parity with a company that was not progressing for several generations
i am sick of waiting to get an actual not minuscule performance increase

>>59207060
Ok, so it's clear an strong AMD is good for all of us. Use a search engine and look for the benefits of competition for the customers. Also search for the anti competitive tactics intel has used over the years. Just sayin'.

>>59207109
certainly
now how much longer do i have to wait till i get a better cpu?

>>59195419
F

>>59207214
A better CPU compared to what in the first place?

>>59207512
to what we have now
ie that which amd got parity to

>>59207590
If everything goes fine for AMD then intel will be obligated to spend money on R&D. By thash talking AMD and trying to deter people from buying their products you're just shooting yourself in the foot.

>>59207888
>if
sure if everything goes fine for AMD
but when did it go fine the last time?
i am waiting for it to go fine for god knows how long already and they are not managing it

>>59206675
this may not happen but at this point my hopes for competition with a bough out amd would be higher than with their continuing failure to pressure intel

also just to make sure you are being serious here
do you really believe that at this point there are people who are not on either of the two sides in these shill filled topics?

F

>>59199463
Yes, take an Apple iPhone for example.
They are shit but people buy them anyways. My One Plus 3 even looks better and is half the price.
If you think Android is hard to use then just look at what Apple does every update...

Retards here don't realize that Nvidia is already 3 times more valuable on the stock market.

Not to forget that Nvidia is making big money in the industry cooperating with Tesla, BMW and other big car manufactures.

And there are also big data center, over 90% of professional user have a Nvidia card.

Intel just sat on their fat asses, while Nvidia is pushing hard.