Trump FCC Boss Calls Net Neutrality 'A Mistake'

>Jew turns to jew mode

>>59194849
Hopefully this cancer won't spread to Europe.

>>59194849
POO

File: ajit_pai.jpg (19KB, 990x400px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 990x400px

>Stock Market record highs
>Regulations melting away
>Free Enterprise finally free
What a time to be alive. You autists were pissed about Wheeler too. But you came around. You'll apologize, eventually.

>>59194849
DRUMFPKINS BTFO!!!!

>>59194972
TPB will be soon blocked in entire Europe because of EU :^)
We got the same kind of cancer here, except our cancer is more leftist

>>59194849

>Former literal Comcast shill says...

Wow you don't say, what a shock, I am speechless.

>>59194849
a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-atleast we pissed off those sjw's amiright g-guys?

File: assburger.gif (2MB, 500x342px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x342px

>>59195017
>Regulations melting away

Yeah, sure...

>>59195026
Good luck with that.

>posting politics on a communist technology board

File: 694940094001_4940752840001_6accafa8-d6c0-4f9d-8780-1ab49fe6b218.jpg (60KB, 780x438px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 780x438px

THANK YOU BASED TRUMP.

>>59195073
>communist
It's an anarchist board.

>ITT: TPP shills

File: 1487943696911.jpg (40KB, 350x350px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 350x350px

>>59195113
>with TPP
>American companies move manufacturing from China to SE Asia, SE Asia becomes politically closer to the US and stronger allies against China

>without TPP
>more and more Duterte's come to power and align themselves more closely with China and further from the US

Do you want China to build up their military and invade Japan?

>>59195140
>Do you want China to build up their military and invade Japan?

That would be fun.

File: 1486958208750.jpg (113KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 800x600px

>drain the swamp!!!1
>appoints the most rotten corporatist corrupt and treasonous russia spy gov in history

well done, votefags

>>59195090
one and the same thing

you're all hopelessly clueless

>>59195164
burger education?

File: Pai.gif (84KB, 439x396px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 439x396px

>>59195017

>>5919514
>believing the lies of Ricardo Lagos

He never said this bullshit before he was elected. Wouldn't have voted for him.

>a mongolian cat huffing blog is worth the same traffic quality as ebay, youtube or other large websites
this is what neutralfags actually believe in

>>59195379
Haha you think 4chan will have a "high traffic quality"? Netflix will be ruined as well, since Comcast owns some cable companies. Say bye to VPNs while you're at it. Enjoy paying an extra 10 euro a month for "entertainment packages"

File: 16649264.jpg (41KB, 480x475px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 480x475px

Why didn't burgercucks vote for Bernie?
He seems like a wise veteran in comparison to a brain dead idiot like tramp.

Yeah just believe this shit without a real source, and no, dslreports.com doesn't count. fucking cucks.

>>59195378

Almost as though a politician's word isn't good for anything, and you should be evaluating them based on the kinds of people they are and the things they've done.

Trump displayed all the warning signs of being an incompetent dumbshit at best and a malignant fascist at worst, and, lo and behold, that's exactly what we got.

If you voted for Trump, you're a fucking idiot. I don't care why you did it. He's doing so much damage to every positive aspect of United States society -- and there weren't many left to begin with.

>>59195443
>dslreports.com doesn't count. fucking cucks
in what universe is dslreports not a valid source?

Are you going to tell me next that right wing conspiracy site #253 is more credible than dslreports?

File: 1_SpvUxmb9trQFKdZcw83qpQ[1].png (82KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 800x450px

>>59194849

haaahahaha this is the poojeet that wants to put a bitcoin miner in everything

>>59194849

Does anyone want a subscription based internet?

It seems only big media companies and /pol/ level boot-lickers support the end of net neutrality.

>>59195464
Only dumbshit trump apologists are defending their pride here

File: tumblr_ms34doa2Yr1r9u4bjo1_500.gif (983KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

983KB, 500x281px

>>59195140
>thinking of shopping BLACKED around mugi
>finding an image
>shopping BLACKED into it
>posting it
You had so many chances to stop but you didn't

When the time comes, you'll be the first to go.

>>59195454

Indeed.

Trump is a cunt. The people who voted for him are deluded, demtented, or cunts.

>inB4Hillary...

File: Communism_Then_and_Now.png (1MB, 1937x955px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1937x955px

>>59195431
>>59195454
>>59195163
>>59195073
>>59194972
>>59194881
>>59195464
You ""guys"" should be happy, you can now spend more time at your BLM meetings instead of using your parents Internet

>>59195482
>has no argument...

File: 1488434921306.jpg (54KB, 444x399px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 444x399px

>>59195482
Ah here comes a butthurt trump apologist with 0 relevant counter argument

File: 1484594148349.jpg (103KB, 757x431px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 757x431px

>>59195480
>>59195496
I'm not really sure what these posts sound like, but I do know what they DON'T sound like;

An argument.

File: good_night.jpg (170KB, 546x785px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 546x785px

>>59195501
>>59195496

Why would I have a counter arguments against you anti white SJWs when you don't have any valid arguments to begin with?

>>59195431
because he got ditched by the democrats

Who cares, FCC "net neutrality" wasn't actually protecting consumers at all, the just labeled it so. It was to protect corporations from shakedowns by other corporations. They were already rolling out datacaps and overage charges where-ever they thought they could without losing X consumers.

File: 1478898049426.png (60KB, 700x566px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 700x566px

>>59195531
>Why would I have a counter arguments
Probably because you haven't got any, my retarded Right Justice Warrior fellow.

>>59195464
Why would an ISP introduce complicated subscription based billing models to get more money instead of just raising prices for everyone?

>>59195431
>Bernie "white people can't be poor" Sanders

Why do you SJWs think anyone wanted him?
>>59195550
Stop getting mad and start constructing some logical arguments that aren't based around your SJW ""logic"", my down syndrome friend

>>59195515

I made a statement of agreement.

It's apparent you didn't pay attention in school.

capitalism is fundamentally flawed
it is supposed to harness human greed into prosperity for all
but in this case it clearly fails
so it should be regulated
oh wait it can't be because there is no person who has a chance to win the election and would want to fix this shit

File: 1477086589472.png (584KB, 1320x684px) Image search: [Google]

584KB, 1320x684px

>>59195550
>>59195501
>>59195496
>>59195464
Stop samefag

You're the cancer of both the real world and the tech world.

File: 1482388603599.png (130KB, 645x968px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 645x968px

>>59195431
>Why didn't burgercucks vote for Bernie?
>>59195482 [trump tard]
>You ""guys"" should be happy, you can now spend more time at your BLM meetings
>>59195496
>no argument..
>>59195531 [trump tard]
y shud i have argumaentz if u don't haev argemaentzz xDDDDDDD

I just remembered americans are not the brightest people

>>59195531
> anti white SJWs

...and the endless fantasy continues untouched by reality...

>>59195592
I can't wait for the FCC to regulate what words you can't use on the internet just like they do with TV and radio.

File: 5550300+_c1d2e06f120a303698828f956b8abe1a.gif (1MB, 280x200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 280x200px

>>59195587
>I agree with you
Return to your basement Nazi. You shouldn't have even engaged these gaffers.

File: 1481779254388.jpg (43KB, 592x444px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 592x444px

>>59195582
Typical retarded trumpkin, everyone.
>you are wrong because I said so

>>59195555

ISPs can introduce "packages" of internet sites for subscribers. If you want sites outside your "package", you pay a premium.

This is what big telcos/media giants want.

If they get their way, it's the end of the internet.

>>59195431
>Why didn't burgercucks vote for Bernie?

they did, the DNC conspired against him so he couldn't get on the national ticket

The DNC chairman was forced to stepped down from subverting actual voting Democrats and joined Hillary's campaign to continue cheating the will of the people

>>59195617
Why would they do that instead of just making everyone pay more?

>>59195608
>basement Nazi

A "turning the tables" statement will get you laughed out of an elementry debating society.

Try again.

Also, Godwin.

>>59194849
Consider moving to another country. You should have done this years ago, but you haven't because you're a bunch of retarded amerifats with little to no awareness of what's happening around you.
Get cucked.

File: 1487920131611.jpg (150KB, 635x948px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 635x948px

>>59195598
Why are you leftists such lying faggots?

>>59195609
Aww, the SJW is triggered!

File: 1453432750980.png (776KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

776KB, 800x600px

>>59195460
>go to 21.co
>Replace your email with an email that pays you!
>It's like LinkedIn InMail, except you get paid!
wat

>>59195626

The tiered internet is more profitable.

File: 1478898445015.jpg (307KB, 796x574px) Image search: [Google]

307KB, 796x574px

>>59195640
6 posts and you are yet to post a valid argument. Makes you think, doesn't it.

Idiot

File: 1477081053122.jpg (95KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 960x720px

>>59195598
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MMT3vuSQk3g
This is just one of thousands of documented cases of SJWs instilling anti-white sentiment.

>>59195638
>"don't turn the tables goy! I didn't start this when I assumed you were attacking this one group of irrational people instead of both irrational groups."
I didn't turn the tables to begin with

>>59195640
>leftist.

Get back to /pol/ you boot-licker.

>>59195668
Why would I argue with a child?

>>59195674
>anti white

You have serious issues.

You've been radicalised, and you don't even know it.

You're as bad as a sandnigger.

>>59195665
It's not though.

>ITT:Denial, projection, and shitflinging

Guys, just admit it, you fucked up, and trump was never going to keep net neutrality. It was a republican talking point that it was bad, and trump just went along with whoever they suggested to take the FCC chair.

>>59195699

Yes it is.

Subscription based, tiered, internet is the most profitable business model.

It's also the death of the internet.

File: 1478899482282.jpg (97KB, 960x800px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 960x800px

>>59195694
And yet you post childish comments
>le faggo xd
>le SJW xD
>levdisd XDD
>cuck :DDDD

>>59195715
That must explain why cable TV is doing so well then.

File: That+s+one+smug+son+of+a+bitch+_1207109c6b91f6e502873f280300b56b.png (76KB, 326x265px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 326x265px

>>59195698
>literal proof everywhere that white people are being targeted by SJWs based on their ethnicity
>not anti-white
Wow, I can't believe it's not an argument!

>>59195724

Cable TV isn't the internet.

File: Screen_Shot_20170213_at_6.48.14_pm.png (81KB, 669x231px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 669x231px

>>59195716
Stop getting so mad, you white guilt SJWS are the only ones bringing up cuckolds ITT

No one has addressed the argument that the "net neutrality" everyone is flinging shit over did absolutely nothing to prevent price gouging of consumers. Consumers are the small fries in the equation. The cable company is happy putting data-caps on you and charging for overages which they were already doing under these rules.

The "net neutrality" rules just prevented ISPs from shaking down other corporations for excessive use of the infrastructure. This ruling is bad news for amazon and netflix but most likely won't do shit to your home internet pricing beyond the increases they already had planned.

Republicans and trump are shitting it up for all americans that aren't the top, yet shills continue to defend this bullshit.

I up to here with this stupidity. How can people defend trump and and his goons? They're to enrich themselves and couldn't give a shit less about the average or low class american.

Yet the minute you disagree with what he says alt-righters come in and show it's SJW's triggered or some dumb nonsense as if it's only SJW's and leftys getting fucked over.

>>59195747
Then why didn't ISPs switch to the model before net neutrality regulations were implemented in 2012?
Link me to a paper proving that it is a better model. Oh wait, there isn't one and you are making up a dumb doomsday scenario.

why is /pol/ so fucking stupid holy shit

>>59195729

You're only seeing what you want to see.

You have been radicalised.

The same thing happens to young Muslim men when exposed to Jihadist propaganda.

You are no different.

>>59195761
Trump did nothing wrong

>>59195766
>why are people on /g/ so fucking stupid to fall for an obvious false flag

File: 1480455553689.png (38KB, 1056x610px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 1056x610px

>>59195766
When you have no real argument, you just act stupid and yell loud to cover it up.

>>59195776
>obvious false flag
I think the couple of pol-tards ITT are actually serious

None of you stupid fucks even know what net neutrality was, protip: its not what you think it was. At this point I'm pretty convinced both sides are just political shills.

>>59195763
>Then why didn't ISPs switch to the model before net neutrality regulations were implemented in 2012?

They tried.

>Link me to a paper proving that it is a better model.

I didn't say it was a "better" model (you fucking retard), I said it was potentially more profitable.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiered_Internet_service

Citations in footnotes.

File: nazis_watch_it.jpg (355KB, 980x653px) Image search: [Google]

355KB, 980x653px

>>59195786
Why are you SJWs getting so mad you are getting called out on your bullshit?

>>59195776
Whoa, CTR/JIDF/SPLC/ACLU/Podesta/Soros/NATO are really branching out with their online psyops tactics.

File: vapesupreme.jpg (47KB, 543x533px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 543x533px

>>59195698
>anti white

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6rCTMQz6sEE

>Hispanic man calls 911, describes a person as "black" after being asked the race by the operator
>Calls him an asshole because he suspects him of the multiple breaks-ins in the neighborhood

Neo-Nazi vigilante gunning down poor black kids in the street

>Black "teen" calls Jeantel the Hut
>Calls him a creepy ass cracka

What a funny term! He's very lighthearted, I don't see why George Zimmerman needed a gun against this football linebacker, why is George Zimmerman so racist using these inflammatory terms?

>>59195807
/pol/ pls go, and stay go

>>59195799
>potentially more profitable
Ok, link me to the direct citation that claims that. I'm not going to go through 40 links from Wikipedia.

File: hhVZrmz (1).jpg (54KB, 450x640px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 450x640px

>>59195767
>You're only seeing what you want to see.
I'm not sure whether that's hypocritical or ironic. Might be both

Oh, and here's another said case of clear anti-white sentiment perpetuated by the SJWs on the left.
>>59195749

You've still provided nothing resembling supporting information for your baseless claims.

>>59195816
/g/ isn't your safespace, leftypol

>>59195818
> Rouskas, G.N. (2009). Internet tiered services: Theory, economics, and quality of service. New York: Springer.

You dumb fuck

File: 1487658497318.jpg (22KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 400x400px

>>59195807
I'm a super alt right white nationalist justice worrier of 4chen and I'm uncucking this website with my aryan white cumrag.
Last week I even killed my neighbors' nigger dog because it was not white. That nigger dog was being offensive to white dogs and so I uncucked the family with holy alt right shotgun.

Fucking niggers I bet they are jews too.

>>59195818
I just want to point out that the specific protections under the current label of net neutrality did not protect consumers from tiered internet packaging, but it is in the interest of many large web companies to convince consumers that it will be a doomsday when these protections are rolled back.

>>59195832
/g/ isn't your safe place, /pol/

>>59195821
>r anti-white sentiment perpetuated by the SJWs on the left.

You're still sputing the same crap.

You're the same as a dumb sandnigger.

File: 2e8.jpg (92KB, 829x589px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 829x589px

>>59195851
>This poorly written falseflag
2/10
See me after class anon.

>>59195864
Fucking nigger enabler

File: Srgfd.png (53KB, 1306x354px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 1306x354px

>>59195832
No, but /pol/ IS your containment board

>>59195843
Ok, now quote the exact part of that source that states your claim. Oh wait, you can't because you didn't actually read it, and the part that uses it on wikpedia states nothing on that topic.

>>59195857
I'm not the one crying about "much evil white people", anon

The "two people" arguing in this thread are shills attempting to derail the thread completely.

>>59195652

Okay, so this might be a lot to take in.

The guy in OP's picture started this company called 21 and co, the goal is to literally put a bitcoin miner in everything. He got $120m+ in Venture funding and his idea basically went to shit. They released a "starter" bitcoin miner for developers, developers, developers to "learn" bitcoin. It sold for like $500 and nobody bought it, the thing sold like 3 at most (nobody bought it because someone figured out they could make their own with a RaspberryPI). I don't know what the fuck he is doing with that website now.

This is the product they were selling:

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B014RD021C

>>59195543

But protecting corporations from shakedowns by other corporations *does* protect the consumer. What do you think antitrust regulations are for?

>>59195582

My entire county (in Missouri!) went for Sanders in the primary. I voted for him myself.

>>59195624

This. Look it up. The DNC primary was literally (and I'm not using 'literally' colloquially here, either) rigged against everybody who wasn't Hillary Clinton. It was a shame and a disgrace.

>>59195875
I'm not the one crying about "much evil black people", anon

>>59195856
Net neutrality doesn't protect consumers from jack shit. If a cimpany wanted to charge $20 extra for acess to Facebook, they can just charge $20 extra to everyone instead.

>>59195872
>a screenshot from /co/ means that 4chan is a safehaven for SJWs
0/10
>>>/leftypol/

File: 1476908358045.gif (315KB, 234x159px) Image search: [Google]

315KB, 234x159px

>>59195862
>You're still sputing the same crap.
Because you haven't even attempted to refute it.
Hopefully because you're just smart enough to realize you can't refute facts.
And stop trying to act like you aren't some SJW just because you criticize Mudslimes

>>59195885
My point is that the "net neutrality" policy being ended doesn't mean we're going straight to idiocracy internet, "insert 5 walmart bux for 15 minutes of porn net now".

I want internet service providers classified as common carriers.

>>59195903
>insert 5 walmart bux for 15 minutes of porn net now

Can someone post the UK porn access hotline picture?

>>59195883
So he stole venture money, made something someone in 2008 made for the same cost in ~2016 and is now doing who the fuck knows what with email.

got it.

>>59195893
Thats what I said. Did you not read my post?

Net neutrality did nothing to protect consumers, it was entirely for web companies to be protected from the ISPs. The one possible consequence is netflix subscriptions increasing 1-2 dollars in price.

>>59195885
There are no cases of ISPs issuing a "shakedown" on other companies.

>>59195885
Hillary won in the primary in 2008, I don't see you crying over her

>>59195923
oh go fuck yourself

https://youtu.be/fpbOEoRrHyU?t=4m

>>59195921
Netflix saved money through the Comcast deal though. Building direct interlinks to last mile ISPs instead of going through a middleman is a already common strategy used by other big internet companies. Netflix just made a big deal about how Comcast wasn't letting them do it for free.

>>59195937
>I don't see you crying over her

Can you prove that the head of the DNC in 2008 was directly trying to influence the outcome of the democratic primary election?

I can in 2016.

File: flat,800x800,075,f.jpg (116KB, 761x800px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 761x800px

>>59195939
>John Oliver

>>59195957
just do a google search then, faggot

>>59195955
>Can you prove that the head of the DNC in 2008 was directly trying to influence the outcome of the democratic primary election?
I know the Democratic party is known for being hopelessly corrupt

>>59195948
I'm confused, are you for "net neutrality" as it existed?

I'm just saying that either way it will not have much of an impact on consumers.

File: Martin_Heidegger.jpg (48KB, 318x460px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 318x460px

>>59195900
>Because you haven't even attempted to refute it.

In logic it isn't possible to prove a negative.

The onus is on you to provide evidence. So far, all you've provided is conspiricy. No evidence.

>And stop trying to act like you aren't some SJW just because you criticize Mudslimes

I'm a 43 year old man.

I've travelled. I've seen the World. I've lived.

From first hand experience, I can tell you - you're full of shit.

>>59195899
>Not knowing that rule #3 also goes for /pol/

File: 635999710900159426831408221_hqdefault.jpg (24KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 480x360px

>>59195962
>fake news

>>59195968
My interpetation of net neutrality is that it would prohibit direct interconnects, which would just raise prices for everyone.

File: disagreement-hierarchy.jpg (92KB, 679x516px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 679x516px

>>59195957
>>59195975
>ad hominem instead of refuting the content

>>59195971
Only of Hiro said so, which he hasn't

File: 1470303001763.png (7KB, 1795x709px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 1795x709px

>>59195985
Quick, before he posts again, I need the smug anime girl version of this

>>59195939
That situation was more of Netflix issuing a shakedown on Comcast. They overloaded Comcast's network by choosing poor routes to connect to end users and blamed them for it.

Leftists are the willing pawns of their capitalist masters

File: 1479402493665.png (93KB, 500x405px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 500x405px

>>59196013
>"choosing poor routes"
Don't worry citizen, this one just chose a poor road to travel down on, our road. He made a mistake, and we will be correcting his behavior soon enough.

File: 94e183147529f6260edd5260d7de5a17.png (123KB, 612x563px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 612x563px

>>59195970
>The onus is on you to provide evidence. So far, all you've provided is conspiricy. No evidence.

All you retarded, I've provided two sources already demonstrating Anti-white sentiment from the left and would post more if it weren't for the mere fact that we're already way off board topics, but all you do is yell "WRONG". Disputing evidence with "wrong!" isn't an actual argument.

Go back to your containment board
>>/reddit/

>I'm 43
>I've traveled. I've seen the World. I've lived.
>From first hand experience
Holy fuck, how insecure must you be about yourself to try and verify your claims by acting like you are some sort of a credible source instead of providing actual facts and evidence.

i hope 2017 will be the year when this libtard reddit meme finally dies

>internet should be free and equal!!1
>let the government to regulate it!

>>59195939
https://www.forbes.com/sites/larrydownes/2014/11/25/how-netflix-poisoned-the-net-neutrality-debate/#60928c1a1c4d

>>59196042
>internet access should be competitive and guided by the free market!
>let a duopoly of non-competing government subsidized telecoms with a captive customer base run everything

Can't wait for some "Open Communications Act" to ban it for good

>>59196042
I love this meme that nothing can be effectively regulated ever.

>>59196037
> I've provided two sources already demonstrating Anti-white sentiment

You've been radicalised.

It doesn't matter what counter evidence, or refutation, you're presented with, you will refuse to believe it.

>>59196085
bravo, you've got to the root of the problem -- the government having too much influence over the economy and other areas it shouldn't concern itself with, resulting in crony capitalism among other things

but instead of actually addressing it and calling for a smaller government, you want to increase their control even further

>>59196042

It's apparent you're not very smart.

An open internet requires protection.

>"Freedom for the pike is death for the minnow".

Learn this phrase and remember it.

File: 1474505392200.jpg (9KB, 240x200px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 240x200px

>>59196148
>claiming i'm radicalized with no statement as to why that's the case
>"It doesn't matter what counter evidence, or refutation, you're presented with, you will refuse to believe it."
>I can't possibly have a viewpoint counter to yours, unless there's something wrong with me
You just proved to everyone in this thread that it's you whose the radicalized one

I bet you believe in internalized oppression as well, don't you?

>>59196157
Deregulation isn't an antidote to lobbying and the FCC and other regulatory agencies are needed to provide a latticework of checks and balances. If you think small government does anything apart from streamline corruption and businesses' access to government you have a fundamental misunderstanding of democracy.

The root of the problem is that telecom infrastructure isn't a free market and never will be no matter how hard anyone pretends. You can't just dig up people's lawns throughout the country and start laying your own fiber.

>>59196208
>You just proved to everyone in this thread that it's you whose the radicalized one

A "turning the tables" statement will get you laughed out of an elementry debating society.

>>59196228
That won't be a problem when wirelss technology like LTE will be the standard for last mile connections in the future.

>>59196228

Absolutely.

There are physical limitations in the real World, too. There is only one single shortest route between any two points.

Anyone who owns this route will have a monopoly on the shortest distance.

Natural monopolies are unavoidable. We need government to regulate them.

File: VCGS40w (1).jpg (36KB, 793x736px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 793x736px

>>59196231
A "you cant have an argument because I think your viewpoint is wrong" statement will get you laughed out of an elementary debating society.

Also, not knowing how to spell elementary will get you laughed out of an "elementry" debating society.

>>59196259
>Also, not knowing how to spell elementary will get you laughed out of an "elementry" debating society.

There is no "spelling" in a debating society. There's only debate.

retred

File: xjpg.jpg (298KB, 1113x688px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 1113x688px

>>59194849
can hardly wait for this genius idea to trickle down

>>59196275
Why didn't it trickle down before 2012?

>>59196283

They tried.

This is why regulation was introduced.

Idiot.

>>59196288
When? I didn't remember paying $10 extra a month to access Youtune.

>>59196013
sure buddy, did Mexico paid for it too?

>>59196120
the problem is that it's a slippery slope, and it's hard to anticipate the harmful side effects. leaving people to their own devices almost always seems to "just work" and generally gives people the right incentives that are more anchored in reality. the more you regulate, the more you take away from people their sense of responsibility and disempower people

File: 1475816619934.gif (844KB, 268x278px) Image search: [Google]

844KB, 268x278px

>>59196271
>There is no "spelling" in a debating society. There's only debate.
>even elementary students can spell elementary
>all common knowledge goes out the window in a debating society
Yeah, that makes sense with the way you "debate"

>>59196315
Why would Mexico have anything to do with this?

>>59196300
woah, all go home, the redneck didn't remember something

>>59196319
>disempower people
All data is to be treated the same.
>Wow fuck the fed.

>>59196300

Do you know what the term "tried" means?

Idiot.

>>59196342
Point me to a news article then.

>>59196324

Debate occurs in debating societies.

They're not a spelling contest.

File: 1474888185737.jpg (23KB, 439x290px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 439x290px

>>59196342
And Hitler tried to kill the Jews

Yet, Intel is still here. Your point?

>>59196248
oh boy I sure do look forward to garbage latency and flakey connections.

>>59196349

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/apr/28/internet-service-providers-charging-premium-access

>>59194972
In the Netherlands the parliament voted in favour of net neutrality (all traffic is equal, pricing can't vary per service, ISP's can't block traffic, ISP's aren't even allowed to monitor the content of trafic). with 150 in favour and 0 against.

>>59196371
They aren't charging for "premium" access. They are charging a cheaper price for direct interlinks compared to going through a middleman.

>>59196374
The Dutch European Commissioner tried to implement the same system in Europe.
But the EU didn't support the same strict interpretation of net neutrality, so it all gets watered down through lobby groups.

File: 1475978145252.png (3KB, 156x166px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 156x166px

>>59196354
>Debate occurs in debating societies.
>They're not a spelling contest.
They aren't, but if you can't spell elementary, and fail to recognize the mistake when it's underlined in red, then you should seriously consider going back to the 3rd grade and leaving the debates to the educated.

Intellectuals debate
People who don't know how to spell elementary level words spout refuse from their mouths.

>>59196374
The Netherlands law is much lighter on regulations than the FCC one.

>>59195026
afaik it'll only stop showing up in google.

>>59196394
>reading comprehension failure.

>>59196370
i live in fugging eastern europe and get 20ms pings on lte, and reliable connections, stop inventing problems

>>59196409

Pointing out a spelling mistake doesn't invalidate an statement.

>>59196421
The entire premise of the article is incorrect.

>>59196428

Thank god your opinon is of no consequence.

>>59196449
>The ISPs say they only want to get paid for the use of their service, but the problem is, they're already getting paid. You pay your internet bill every month. Netflix, Google, Yahoo, the Guardian and Boing Boing all pay their internet bills every month. TheISPsaren't seeking to get paid, they're seeking to get paid twice: once by you, and a second time because you are now their hostage and the companies you want to do business with have to get through them to get to you.

>There's a useful analogy to the phone company that I've written about here before: you pay for your phone service every month. The pizza place on the corner also pays for its phone service every month. When you want to order a pizza from Joe's Corner Pizzeria, you call their number. If their phone isn't engaged, it rings and you get to place your order. If they get more orders than they can handle on one line, they buy a second line, a third, even 10 lines to take their orders. Provided one of those lines is free, your call goes through to someone when you ring.

Let me get this striaght, is this what you are referring to?

>>59196417
>Netherlands law
They also have crazy fast internet being a highly population dense society, compared to the USA where networking infrastructure is much more expensive due to distances.

>>59195555
Cable companies do this for TV and it's shit, but they get away with it because there's no competition. Now they go after the internet because people are starting to just cut cable out and get their entertainment in a competitive market and we can't have that now can we.

>>59196425
I personally opted to move to a place with a wired internet connection because the people in my village that used LTE were very unhappy with it.

File: 1475611333441.jpg (16KB, 208x236px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 208x236px

>>59196427
It severely harms the credibility of any debate society if the constituents of said society don't know how to spell basic words and use spellcheck.

The other argument that you conveniently chose to ignore does however invalidate your previous argument.
Remember?

>>59196473
The population density also allows for a lot of competition on the market.

>>59196478
>cable failing
>gee, what can we do to increase profits
>let's copy the cable industry!

>>59196493
Yeah

>>59196315
>>59196024

>Moving the goalposts

>>59195454
>>59195480
kek, fuck you demofascists.

>>59195017
He sure is one ugly fuck. I'm not sure what it is but his face is not proportioned right.

>>59196896
Dude found himself a coalburning lady folk to match.

>>59196473
Then move to NY for the fast internet. :^)

>PAI AJIT

File: 2.jpg (110KB, 907x907px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 907x907px

>>59195073
>/g/
>communist
>A literal consumer tech board
>communist

>>59195482
>/leftypol/
Go back to the degeneracy you came from.

>>59195431
Because he can afford an extra house or something despite being the lowest paid senator, and because his support of Hillary over Trump was significant for some reason.

Basically ameritards make the most retarded excuses not to vote for good candidates, and even more retarded reasons to vote for horrible ones.

File: mugi.jpg (344KB, 1300x1450px) Image search: [Google]

344KB, 1300x1450px

>>59195474
>tumblr gif
Stay mad cuck

>>59195017
just means a crash is coming. I'm dumping some stock in the next few months.

File: Smug-Neanderthal.jpg (56KB, 630x400px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 630x400px

>>59198245
>Posts BLACKED Mugi images unironically
>Calling someone else a cuck

>>59195017
Regulations melting away so you can drink water full of washed coal chemicals for another company profit

Indeed, what a time to be alive

>>59195245
mutton shank

File: 001.png (149KB, 500x313px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 500x313px

>>59199552
>Using political cartoons to make your point instead of an actual argument

>>59198400
More like
>Regulations melting away so you can actually start a goddamn business and turn a profit for once in 30 years

It's like you forget the Reagan years happened

>>59199955
You clearly have never owned a business, lived during the Reagan years, or know anything about why net neutrality is critically important

File: 1.png (178KB, 424x318px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 424x318px

>>59200012
>More needless government regulation is important
Why? It's kinda clear that the people most gov't bureaus (barring a handful) have no idea what they are doing, seeing that our infrastructure is shit, our inner cities are third world tier and Gold King was even allowed to happen. Why would I let the FCC (the agency that censors the radiowaves ad absurdum) have anything to do with the Internet? All they do is censor any medium they have their hands on, especially after 9/11. I'd rather not have that instead of basically everything I watch on Youtube or what not being censored to the point of complete incoherence.

File: 1f1.jpg (96KB, 680x691px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 680x691px

>>59195163
>Redefining what the swamp is
You know he meant career politicians right? How many career politicians are on his cabinet, especially after that pledge to create term limits in both the House and Senate.

http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/312571-cruz-desantis-push-for-congressional-term-limits

http://thehill.com/news/house/314308-right-renews-push-for-term-limits-as-trump-takes-power

>>59195140
>Ignoring the fact that China is at the same point Japan was in the 1980s now: a shit military that hadn't fought in at least a generation and a stagnating economy
China's literally falling apart. Honestly, India and the Philippines and the rest of SE Asia will probably pick up it's slack

>>59195017
>Regulations melting away

Along with consumer protections. Corporations have personhood in America!

>>59195482
>b-b-b-b-b-b-b-blm

Is that all you got?

>>59200478
Not to mention China knows that we would nuke mainland China if they tried to invade one of our partners or more likely launch a full scale military invasion of the region and utterly obliterate them militarily. I'm not even saying that because "Murrica". I'm saying that because:
1) We literally have more nukes than them
2) We're still in an active war. They haven't been to war in 50 years

I'm annoyed that this is probably going to affect Canada too.

We need Amazon, wikipedia and google to all shutdown like last time.