The great debate

>>59191180
16:9 is the standard, so it will always be the most practical and least masochistic

>>59191193
>t. neo/g/

>>59191195
>t. edgy hipster

>not 9:6

>>59191180
16:10 because it is very close to the golden ratio

/thread

>>59191180
4:3 is masterrace, fight me niggers

>>59191213
Golden ratio?

File: 1462126061200.jpg (461KB, 900x675px) Image search: [Google]

461KB, 900x675px

>>59191225
Education?

>>59191243
I guess I'll google it to see what you're talking about, never heard a goldenratio about monitor aspect ratios

File: 1afb13ecae7970b5522a9fe59ac3e7ac.png (82KB, 700x320px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 700x320px

>>59191213
Nature has spoken

>>59191328
is it good for tablets too

File: 16by10.jpg (69KB, 500x351px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 500x351px

>>59191267
here

>>59191180
21:9

>>59191180
Depends. For laptop definitely 3:2

>>59191180
16:10 for fucking life.

>>59191180
21:9 for desktop and 3:2 for laptop and tablet.

>>59191180
683:384

>>59191342
Yes, the Nexus 7 2013 has it (1920x1200) and I love it.

>>59191267
The golden ratio applies to everything you uneducated nigger. That's why it's called "golden", it's so good that applying it to anything makes anything look good.

>>59191180
16:9 for anything at 1440 or higher resolution.
3:2 or 16:10 for tablet. doesn't matter

File: 1472448478609.jpg (232KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

232KB, 1920x1080px

Why aren't these numbers factorised properly?
>>59191180
16:10 -> 8:5

>>59191358
21:9 -> 7:3

>>59191542
683:384 -> 683:(3)2^7

>>59191211
>fucking 9:6

Depends.

On desktop ultrawides are popular because they are have satisfactory height/vertical pixels, so more in the sides is welcome for workspace, movie size and peripheral vision in games.

On laptops and tablets it's the complete opposite. All the highend products, Apple laptops/tablets, Surface Pro, etc. are 16:10, 4:3 or 3:2.
If viewing port feels limited, a streched out image is super annoying compared to a more square one. I miss my 16:10 laptop

8:5 > 16:10

16:10 is 3:2

3 + 3 + 3 + 3 + 3 = 16
2 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 = 10

File: 1393167221974.gif (690KB, 384x288px) Image search: [Google]

690KB, 384x288px

>>59192114

>>59191786
you need to ask yourself the question "how do you find the scale factor of the area of two different figures?"

lets say you have a figure: 1x1
and another: 4x4

the area of the first is 1, the area of the next is 16

the scale factor is 4, but the ratio of the two figures is 4^2: 16

so, in aspect >>>ratio<<<, using 8:5 is wrong.

>>59192114

>3x5=16

American detected

>>59192114
Go back to the slums Poojeet

>>59191193
16:9 is the compromise ratio aka the cuck ratio

4:3

vertical 16:9 (9:16) is goat
it's like the entire internet was made for this configuration but it was kept a secret to prevent normies from being comfy

keep it secret, keep it safe

1:1
Smaller number = better

File: 1464123045770.png (30KB, 130x161px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 130x161px

>>59192114

>>59192245
Monitor dimensions only describe side length in relation to each other, not a scale factor, consider a 16:9 25" monitor and a 16:10 19" monitor

So in aspect, 16:10 and 8:5 are identical, why use the bigger numbers?

File: 2016-08-27 (4).jpg (58KB, 474x843px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 474x843px

>>59191180
21:9 is the only answer.

16:10 good for tablets?

16:16 is superior

>>59192114
Do you happen to be a trumpkin?

File: 1486698848469.png (514KB, 532x582px) Image search: [Google]

514KB, 532x582px

>>59191180
4:20

>>59191180
16:10 for laptops

3:2 for (((tablets)))

>>59191213
The golden ratio is bullshit pseudoscience.

>>59191180
4:10 PM

>>59195448
Most whites voted for Trump. It should also be noted most people with disposable incomes and higher education levels also voted for Trump. Piecing it all together most who voted democrat were a minority (niggers and spics) and in general a lower class generally poor citizens. The facts are kind of scary. Funny though when you think of all the projecting done to make it appear that the other side is a bunch of hillbillies or racist rednecks when it's actually themselves.

>>59191180
Either 16:10 or 5:4.
2:3 is for photography.

>>59195944
Woah, you really wrote an essay over there, what's wrong? Dropped out of school because the school had jews and niggers?

>>59191213
Golden ratio is bullshit.

File: bateman cannot handel.gif (4MB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 300x300px

>16:10
>not 8:5

makes my blood boil

>>59195944
You're as retarded and as delusional as people who believe Einstein failed math. You just want to believe that it's true to feel less miserable.

>>59191180
8:5

5:4 Master Race you jews

1:1

>>59191180
16:9 or 4:3

16:9 for larger screens to have split screen multitasking and media

4:3 for smaller devices for using in portrait mode or for smaller monitors

3:2 is a good compromise for laptops but it's not really good at anything in particular