Ryzen 5 1400X

>>59190985
>Anno Domini 2017
>4c/8t

>>59190985
Both the 1400X and 1200X seem like great value

>>59191122
Indeed. Value is strong there.

>>59191122
I think their overclocking abilities will determine this more. If you can push these things more than the 1800X that will be great.

>>59190985
Na. I think that'd be the 1600X.

There are lots of newer games that perform better on a 6800k over a 7700k despite the 25% lower per-core performance.
That trend will continue, making the 1600X a good future-proofing option unless you plan to upgrade to Zen+ in 2019 anyway.

>>59190985
You'd have to be retarded not to buy 1500 for 30 extra. I'm pretty sure you can OC the non X processors.

>>59193593
The meme about Ryzen was all CPU's OC but you need specific mobo chipsets to OC.

>>59193593
>>59190985
you'd truly have to be retarded not to spend another $30 for double the L3 and 50% more cores

>>59190985
no, 1600X going to be best price/performance.

Wait for th actual reviews and benchmarks to be out to decide this shit.

>>59193686
One of the things about the 6 core that's going to be crazy is getting another 33% more cache per core.

But since they bumped the 1600X to 3.6/4.0ghz, I wouldn't be surprised if it really ends up costing closer to $300 while the 3.3/3.7 will be a 1500X model at $259.

That leak is not final. The Ryzen 7s were not exactly according to it.

>>59190985
Nah. 1600x is looking way better

>>59193525
exactly this

/thread

im getting the 1600x since im not quite that fucking poor but i am pretty poor pls give me a job

File: zHVYh8r.gif (2MB, 540x304px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 540x304px

>>59194903
12 to be exact