AMD RX 500 Series to launch in April - REBRANDED RX 400

May 30th is my birthday.

>>59188360
Will you be throwing a party with all your friends Anon?

>>59188343

When (((AMD))) does it, it is OK!

>>59188343

What a cuck

>>59188343
AMD has to save that penny.

Get ready for 3 alterations of 480 over next 3-4 years same way you saw 3 alterations of 7970 with minor $20 price cuts with each gen.

This company is such a fucking joke but sadly we live in a world where people will settle for less if it means saving 40 dollars on a purchase you make once every few years.

>>59188373
>implying I'm not a friendless psuedo NEET (I have a shitty job, but I live like a NEET)
I'll probably have dinner with my family and that's it.

>10% faster than RX 480
Meh

>>59188360
Holy shit same here. Thas like a 1 in 365 chance !

File: 1447474158579.jpg (13KB, 499x499px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 499x499px

well shit i was just that close to giving up on AMD. i can wait 2 months for high end vega.

>>59188343
How many times has this garbage been delayed already?

>>59188449

indefinitely

Nice what abourt prices will they be cheaper?

>>59188486
>wait for rebrands is nice
wew lad

>>59188343
>rebranded RX400
oh boy I'm so angry, the sub 200 dollar cards are totally where all the tech should be dumped into.

File: 1466543932625.png (226KB, 468x345px) Image search: [Google]

226KB, 468x345px

>No 490
Why

So how long can I keep my 380X if I only do 1080p60

File: laugingsnorks.jpg (110KB, 400x358px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 400x358px

>>59188343
>Vega is so shit AMD has to rehash Poolaris with a whopping 4% performance boost to try to placate the poojeets while they desperately try to unfuck it

The keks just won't stop.

File: 12407264_1050017678383621_769325062_n.jpg (50KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 640x640px

>rebranded rx480 overclocked to near housefire level for a 6% performance increase and 120% tdp increase

File: amd.png (42KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 653x726px

>>59188343
ITS NOT FAIR GUYS

I'm rocking a 270x, stay with what i have? 1080 30fps.

File: 1467294946430.jpg (138KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 653x726px

>>59188547

NO! NO!

File: 1467296306101.png (91KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 653x726px

>>59188343

SO WHAT?!

IT IS FINE WHEN (((AMD))) DOES IT!

>Nvidia kills Poolaris with a DX12 driver
>AMD's answer is to release rebrands of already loud and hot cards

2017 IS THE YEAR OF AMD BABY!

Pascal is just a supercharged Maxwell (same IPC, higher clocks). EVERYONE DOES REBRANDS. Just making things clear.

It's a shame that Vega isn't coming out yet. But they never said it would come out 2017 H1. People need to be patient; for all we know, we could have a Pascal crusher + Volta competitor on our hands. HBM2 is on the Horyzen.

>>59188647
Kill yourself you pathetic AMD shill. You aren't even subtle or ironic about it.

>>59188647
Whoops. Nevermind I was wrong. April's still too early though.

>all the samefagging itt
We get it m8

File: 1488066606164.jpg (408KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

408KB, 2048x1536px

>>59188647
>Pascal is just a supercharged Maxwell (same IPC, higher clocks)

>>59188685
>18 posters 26 reply
k

File: 1368128822120.jpg (253KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 960x720px

>>59188647
>Pascal is just a supercharged Maxwell (same IPC, higher clocks).

File: AMlosi.jpg (259KB, 670x768px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 670x768px

>>59188647
>People need to be patient

uhhh We are waiting

>>59188647
ur just a rebrand of yur retarded ancestors

>>59188420

>1 in 365

someone dropped out of highschool.

File: AMD™ Motto.png (24KB, 353x414px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 353x414px

>>59188647

pic related

>>59188343
Im done with amd gpus. I will get a 1700x and probably the gtx1080 non ti...

File: amdloo.png (316KB, 882x758px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 882x758px

>nvidia probably bought all HBM2 stock for their p100 cards
>amd doesn't have enough ram for vega
>1080 beats it at price
>mfw

>>59188343
Sure, they're going to be the low end, while vega will be the high end.

They'll also be somewhat better at all the steps, and drive the older 4xx model prices lower.

Not a bad deal, is it.

Wait so this is literally a Kaby lake-tier rebranding?

>Nvidia is still stuck on 16nm in mid-to-high end
EMBARRASSING

>>59188647
>People need to be patient

The eternal call of the AMDtard

File: oh-snap.gif (895KB, 351x227px) Image search: [Google]

895KB, 351x227px

>>59188739

>>59188766
Oh shit. What was the correct answer?

File: 1457119551294.png (198KB, 395x302px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 395x302px

>>59188360
May 31th!

>>59188343

>AMD’s Refreshed Polaris Based RX 500 Series – RX 580, 570, 560 & 550

>AMD’s Brand New RX Vega Series – Vega 10 & Vega 11

Vega =/= RX 500 series

Nvidia did the same thing with the pascal cards, which are nothing more than the maxwell cards with a more refined lithography and a high clock.

In resume: IT'S FUCKING NOTHING!

Now learn to read, dumbass.

File: ayyymd.jpg (439KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

439KB, 1920x1080px

>>59189011
>In resume: IT'S FUCKING NOTHING!
Literally the current state of AMD.

>>59189011
Jesus stop...

>>59189011
>Nvidia did the same thing with the pascal cards

>>59188343

Does this mean price are gonna drop like the new 560 is gonna be like the 470, or are they gonna stay the same example 570 the same as 470?

File: 1486594467572.jpg (12KB, 258x245px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 258x245px

>>59189011
>Nvidia did the same thing with the pascal cards
here we go

>>59189011
>Vega =/= RX 500 series
No shit, what is your point?

While AMD catched up with Intel, which is totally the fault of Intel for not pushing more into R&D, Nvidia is moving forward with even bigger steps after one.

AMD won't be able to catch up with Nvidia in the GPU departement.

Vega will be already outdated after half a year of its release with Volta coming.

>>59189011
>autism: the post

AMD RX 500 Series to launch in April: REBRANDED RX 400

and

thr AMD Radeon RX VEGA will not be released in April but May 30th

File: 1486447590772.png (86KB, 600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 600x1200px

>>59189011
>pascal are rebrand of maxwell

>>59188449
Never, Vega has never had a launch date, or even an announcement date

File: 1401411435559.jpg (19KB, 384x396px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 384x396px

>>59189209

>Vega will be already outdated after half a year of its release with Volta coming.

Pretty much this.

Sad.

I don't care if a card is a rebrand if it provides good performance for the price. The thing is just that a 480 is starting to get really weak in comparison to a now cheaper 1080 or a 1080ti. It's like AMD only sells toys before Vega.

>>59189296
The reason it isn't out yet is precisely to avoid this
AMD could've released Zen much sooner but decided not to, to avoid being the budget option again
Vega is the same no doubt about it. They already showed something that performed like the GTX 1070 back in December, and that wasn't even on proper driver making use of the architecture. Yet no sight of Vega yet.
There's no point in releasing a flagship card that is outperformed massively (see 1080ti performance) at launch.

>>59189279
We got drummer boy ad making noise and now spicy hot 3d render ad.
>noise
>hot
They're literally telling ayymdfags what to expect.

File: let-down.png (609KB, 854x640px) Image search: [Google]

609KB, 854x640px

>>59189462

I was told that vega is not ready yet. Not even production! This was reported last night.

It looks like AMD is in deep shit.

>>59188360
Happy birthday here is a pile of shit

File: 1425767525241.jpg (22KB, 225x255px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 225x255px

Why do you people argue so much about computer parts?

File: 1487384886677.jpg (54KB, 412x627px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 412x627px

>>59189506
Why do you people argue so much about cellphones?

AMD needs to focus on getting profits instead of pleasing gaymer kids, they better come up with a compute monster that fucks with nvidia in the datacenter and deep learning markets.

So long as the cards are better due to improvements in production I don't have a problem with rebranding regardless of who does it

This way is better because now when I decide to upgrade from my GTX 660 I won't need to worry about whether the store I am buying my new GPU from is selling older lower quality cards or is selling the newer better quality ones as it will be a different branding.

File: arglinux.jpg (768KB, 900x2200px) Image search: [Google]

768KB, 900x2200px

>>59189506
why do people argue so much about what people are arguing about?

>>59189529
This exactly. They gotta hit where it really hurts. Gaming is nowhere as big as data centers and deep learning.

File: 1371873360622.jpg (35KB, 794x540px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 794x540px

>been waiting to upgrade from 7850 for years, resisting urge to take NVIDIA's jew cock
>AMD keeps delaying everything and making weaker cards, despite their claims
You know AMD, you guys are making it very hard to not say that Nvidia is objectively better

>>59189575
The problem is thats not a ''refresh'' but literally a Kaby Lake tier rebrand.

>>59189626
Provided these cards give as they are claiming a 5% or so improvement for the same power would you rather that they be rebranded or run the risk of purchasing an older lower performing one because you can't tell the difference?

It's not like people are going to purchase these as an upgrade over the older version, though some consumer whores might but who cares about them.

File: 47105_06_amds-gpu-market-share-drops-again-even-release-fury_full[1].png (132KB, 792x432px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 792x432px

>>59189529

Do it faggot. AMD lost the most powerful thing, word-of-mouth from gamers.

Nvidia found a golden egg, cuz they have no problem in expanding the non-gaming related sections because of the recognizable, trustful name.

Most gamers tend to have a professional job, so they can recommend nvidia instead of AMD enthusiastically in B2B.

>>59189597
Even as an AMD supporter, I can admit that they got nothing on the 1070, 1080, and the 1080 Ti (Titan XP is overpriced as shit). Nvidia is indeed currently far stronger and better at $350 and above price points.

However, I recall Raja saying he wanted capable $1000 4k gaming rigs to be a thing. Ryzen has arrived. Now Vega needs to show up. Nvidia might be stronger, but Vega will probably have monstrously better pricing like Ryzen compared to Intel.

>WHY DON'T I GET MY MAGICALLY 20 FPS BOOST FOR THE SAME PRICEPOINT, AMD SUCKS

File: renown physician.png (139KB, 500x514px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 500x514px

>>59188343
AYYYMD IS A FUCKING JOKE

Thanks doc

>>59188343
I don't trust these Pajeets at wccftech and videocardz to be able to translate the German from Heisse.de. Can any Germanbros confirm?

File: 1481536573559.jpg (63KB, 592x674px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 592x674px

>>59190701
thanks doc

File: mhmm.png (81KB, 642x500px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 642x500px

>>59190741

Ja, AMD is fucked up.

>>59188408
Have a good time when it arrives

>>59189099
Likely, as gamers are getting higher binned 480's now, the 500~ series should be higher clocking and more refined on the lithography side, allowing higher performing cards to be made/allowing consumers to finally get what they were selling embed partners.

there is a chance it will go down in price, but if the clock rate is lets say 150-200mhz higher, its likely just going to replace it at the same point.

>>59188343
In all honesty, does anyone here expect amd to bother with consumer gpus till they can mcm them?

Look at the facts, as much as nvidiots hate it, amd was the better buy straight through to the 900 series gpus, and they sold like shit.

Why actually bother making a high end gpu is nearly all the research is for not?

The only reason vega is coming out to consumers in what looks to be a good form is, and look close to what they added, because its real world test bedding the mcm abilities. half the tech in the gpu makes no sense till you put it into that context.

nvidiots wanted a monopoly just like intel users, the only difference is you got it on the gpu side, not so much the cpu, yet.

>>59188975
birthdays are more likely, at least in valentines celebrating countries to come in around november.

another spike happens regionally when winter usually picks up as there is less to do outside so you spend your time inside.

just raw math, 1/365.25 is about right.

>>59188498
do you imagine everyone who waits to have broken or dead hardware, getting by on the igpu?

or do you imagine it to be people who have something that more then gets them by, but they look at new hardware as a chance to max all the settings and decided to get it based on price?

>>59188506
likely for another 4~ years with no worry, consoles are starting to push 4k and that's not going to be possible on the hardware they are given, so sacrifices are going to be made.

>>59191484
This seems really reasonable. I don't think AMD is competing either. Just sort of letting RTG do its thing to try to get out ahead of Nvidia in areas that AMD already has an IP lead. Vega is not a savior of a GPU. Isn't it already basically known to be like a 9 TFLOP GPU? It's basically a 1080.

>>59189462
vega is a test bed with some new tech in it to back the gpu up, its interesting, but pretending its anything more than a real world test for the connection tech that will make navi possible is stupid.

>>59191607
12.5tflops

some of the interesting tech, the 50% not geared toward mcm seems to be there for fix amd's biggest issue, saturating the fucking shaders.

If amd can saturate the shaders at all times, there's not a single chip nvidia makes that will touch it, but barring that, amd will likely be around 1080 if not ahead slightly, may pull ahead at higher resolutions.

The thing is, its a test bed, I can imagine them selling cut ones around 350 and full gpu at 450-500, amd is in a position where they need marketshare, so if they put it out cheap and call it a wash on consumer end, while selling higher binned ones for profit to enterprize who just need flops, the drivers themselves don't matter nearly as much, I can see them trying this strategy out, especially considering how just the zen pre launch is going. on the gpu front its all about getting marketshare back, and if amd partner up with intel and ACTUALLY make the gpu portion and intel puts that on the interposer, that's nvidia getting cornered out of the gpu market on pc. I doubt amd will make intel's gpus, but its a possibility that makes sense, intel sucks dick at gpus, and amd are fairly experienced with mcm.

>>59188343
for christ sake

How long is the poor 290/390 going to limp along for?

390x master race

>>59188647
>Horyzen
t. shill

>>59188408
living the dream

Glad jim keller already save amd, if it were on pajeet amd would be bankrupt already

>>59188343
great, now i can get a rx460 at $50.

>nvidia "tweaks" card every generation
>call it new architecture
>the nvidigoys will eat this shit
>deprecated after 1 year only with legacy drivers
>repeat

>>59192423
>I know all about Raja after he rejoined AMD

>>59188647
Pascal is a completely different architecture you mongoloid

File: 1459955933321.png (2MB, 3508x4961px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3508x4961px

>>59192548
My favorite is when Nvidia charges $100 more for Founders Edition cards which basically masks that they have almost no stock available at launch.

>>59192585
Prove it faggot. Evidence suggests otherwise.
It's not as severe like what Intel did with Kaby, but it's still Maxwell on a smaller node.

>>59192585
People downclocked pascal to maxwell level and got basicaly the same performance using less power wich is expected due to smaller node

>>59192739
That doesn't make any fucking sense

>>59192649
>>59192548
thats funny how nvidia cards are so slow, draw more power and are expensive lol

File: NVIDIA-Pascal-Quadro-P6000_Hitman-2016.png (16KB, 622x581px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 622x581px

>>59192739
>People downclocked pascal to maxwell level and got basicaly the same performance using less power wich is expected due to smaller node

Source pls because the Titan XP/1080ti is not even the ful GP102...

>>59189691

AMD had only 35% of the market share even with 79xx when they were objectively better than 6xx series cards?

Lol, People really hate AMD don't they

>>59192758
>>59192797
It's not rocket science. You just downclock a 1080 until it has the same TFLOPS as a 980 ti. They perform the same when they run at the same speed.

File: 1440906656001.jpg (49KB, 303x407px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 303x407px

>>59192739
>People downclocked pascal to maxwell level and got basicaly the same performance using less power wich is expected due to smaller node

>>59193097
So Polaris (14nm) and Fiji are shit?

>>59193257
Why would they be shit? What do they have to do with anything?

>it's basically the same fucking card with some OC that you can already get from aftermarket brands

LITERALLY WHY?

What's the fucking point?

>>59193309

My point is why AMD don't rebrand Polaris and Fiji like Nvidia Maxwell/Pascal rebrand?

My son, the GPxx and GMxx are two different architecture.

>>59191809
AMD operates on a shoestring budget after hemorrhaging , they don't have the resources to put out a new GPU architecture every nor a new CPU arch every two years. It is by the grace of Allah(behead those who insult Islam) that they are even in business still.

>>59188343
>AMD RX 500 Series to launch in April - REBRANDED RX 400

Isn't this good? I never buy the first of a new line when it comes to tech because it can have problems.

The second one is already optimized

File: 1480628657126.jpg (62KB, 1120x636px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 1120x636px

>>59193351
I don't really understand your English, bro.

That's a weird comparison as Fiji, although still GCN, has HMB which changes quite a bit about how it operates.

Polaris has much more in common with Tonga and Tahiti. If you wanted to call Polaris a Tonga rebrand you'd be partially correct, although Polaris does have the Primitive Discard Accelerator that Tonga lacks. To my knowledge there is really nothing on the die of Pascal chips present that isn't present on Maxwell chips. They're just clocked higher thank to the die shrink and have some evolutionary improvements to features previously included on Maxwell in addition to some extraneous shit like 10bit hardware encoding.

>>59193341

dude, they rebranded the 7970 and 7950 for years. amd is going to do this forever.

>>59193410
It would be, if we had any sort of release date info on Vega. As it stands AMD still has no competition for the 1080/1080ti.

File: tarnation .jpg (64KB, 720x715px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 720x715px

>>59193097
>You just downclock a 1080 until it has the same TFLOPS as a 980 ti

>>59188343
>"Most likely rebrands"
>No source

wowitsfuckingnothing.jpg

>>59189296
>1080 and titan xp are already outdated not even a year after release

Already this.

Sad.

File: free shrugs.jpg (84KB, 449x642px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 449x642px

I mean if the price is reasonable I don't see a problem.

There isn't much difference between last year's [insert model] car and this year's, but they still come out with an updated model every year.

>>59188647
>People need to be patient

The wait meme is real

File: hd1v9pd.png (802KB, 1074x1513px) Image search: [Google]

802KB, 1074x1513px

>>59188343
>release 290x
>rebrand it as 390x + slap 4gb vram more
>rebrand it to 480 on lower nm
>rebrand it to 580 on same nm

What did AMD meant by that?

>>59189084

hey anon you stole (literally) my image, explain yourself now!

>>59188343
If it comes with 1400mhz base clocks and faster RAM it'll be pretty alright

>>59188360
Today is my birthday

Happy birthday to me

>>59193551
>implying amd is not sandbagging
>showing your trump card early

>>59188975
65 IPS ITT make it like a 1/5 chance someone has the exact same birthday as you somehow because of statistics

>>59188343
>tfw I just bought an RX 480
fuck

File: 1411742722900.jpg (172KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 1280x720px

>w-who needs more than 480 now
>v-vega will be 10x 1080ti for pennies
AHAHAHAHAHA
AYYYMDRONES ARE PATHETIC

Waiting on that Ryzen money for RnD.

>>59193097
please stop

1080 has like 300 less cuda cores than the 980ti, and 256 bit memory bus instead of 980's 384 bit.

so 1080 performing the same as the 980ti at the same clockspeed means 1080 is far more efficient, meaning that pascal is a simply better arch

>>59188343
>AMD finally creates a good CPU lineup
>Completely fucks it up by ruining their GPU division by rebranding for the 7th time since Radeon became a thing

Jesus fucking christ, just sell your GPU department to Samsung already.

>>59192548
Then how come with each generation those tweaks make them 30% to 50% faster than the last alteration while AMD was releasing 7970 for 5 years?

File: amdrone.jpg (136KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 1280x720px

>ayyymdrones are irl axis cultists

>>59188343
that's weird because both those sites said vega already released in oktober and then it released in december, oh and don't forget the january release - that was a great one.

>>59188360
>>59188373
>big party with all of his friends
>suddenly half of them take off their jackets and reveal red shirts and hatchets
>they start slaughtering the others who are filthy nvidia users
>as the last one of them is bleeding out, our birthdayboy leans over him and whispers: "Raja sends his regards."

The Red Birthday will come.

>>59196308
That's why he said at the same FLOPS and not clockspeed.

>>59188400
The difference was that the 7970 was 3 years ahead of NVidia and the HBM cards were damn significant.

They could at least make a RX580 with double the transistors and HBM to sell as a RX590.
The RX580 is barely going to compete with the 1070, and only because it'll be a bit cheaper.
But the reality is anyone with an RX480 can just overclock their cards to be an RX580.

This is shit.

>>59189529
This is a lot of what Vega is.
It has a lot of features for data centers.
Supports 512bit floats and its half precision float performance is double that of Nvidias.

But it's taking too fucking long.

File: jpr_q3_2016_amd_vs_nvda_SHIPMENTS_575px.png (17KB, 678x491px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 678x491px

>>59193001
Yeah, it's fucked up. The 7000 was like 60% more performance for the same MSRP as the 580 when it came out. Nvidia had to cut their MSRPs across the board 30%, but they still weren't competitive. Pretty much the biggest leap in performance that happened in a year, at least in the past 15 years.

Maybe AMD wasn't bothering because they can never win. Nvidia is just marketed to normies better.
They're trying to leapfrog with Vega, but it looks like Volta could be right around the corner as well while Nvidia was still able to make lots of high end models.

>>59193439
Not that guy, but why couldn't they have shrunk Fiji to 14nm and slightly increased transistor count?

Then they'd be more power efficient at the small process, and the Fury, Nano, and Fury X were all more powerful than the RX480.

The R9 Fury was a really good card. With driver updates, it's a lot better than the 980. It's like 80-95% the performance of the 1070. So why couldn't AMD just die-shrink it and sell it for $400 as the R10 Polaris or something?

>>59193441
There was actually significant changes in each generation of GCN from the 7970, to the 290, 390, etc.
The only rebrand was that the 7970 became the 280 and stuff like that, but the top end ones, the 290 and 290X, were refreshed architecture.

>>59194737
But you can get an RX480 for $150-$185.
I bet the RX580 is $250. Why would you pay so much more for the same performance you can get from a mild OC?

>>59194943
RX480 is not a rebranded 390X. Polaris has significant differences. It's actually significantly faster now days with the driver updates, and overall much better performance on top of it being cheaper.

something people don't understand is amd took all their resources to make ryzen which is already a giant success

they had to ditch their gpu lineup this time around. shit happens. just buy an nvidia card.

File: 1425242091780.png (473KB, 492x422px) Image search: [Google]

473KB, 492x422px

>>59189506
because you see, most people on here and other vocal parts of the internet are literally children and/or students who don't make their own money, they come to it either by begging mommy and daddy or by saving up over a long period of time from their shitty job or grandma's welfare

then when they finally decide to spend their hard saved/begged money, since they won't be upgrading in a while, they feel the need to rationalize their purchase by claiming their choice was the best and they would buy the part from the same manufacturer again (since it's the best), leading to brand loyalty and all-around butthurt. they want EVERYONE to buy the parts from their manufacturer so they don't feel left out, or come to the conclusion they got jewed hard and their money could have been put to better use.

the reason you ONLY see people arguing is because most of the sane people keep their mouth shut, do their research, decide on what is best for their needs and their budget from reading multiple sources and bringing a rational decision. and then they just get on with it

>>59195078

Happy birthday anon. I am glad that you were born when you did, just like many people in your life, specially your family and most of all ofcourse , your lovely mother whom I fuck daily.

File: 1463833925829.jpg (48KB, 330x319px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 330x319px

>>59196878

>projecting this hard

File: 1488463415140.png (202KB, 668x549px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 668x549px

>>59196868
>ryzen
>giant success

Sell your AMD stocks now boys

>nothing about vega except 37fps dips in nu-doom and curry ice cream ad
>ryzen is btfo in gaming, winrar and video encoding by half priced cpus

HOPEFULLY AYYYYYMDPOOOJEETS KILL THEMSELVES NOW

>>59199504
It's terrible though because we need the competition to keep intel and nvidia prices in check and performance steps large.

>>59199389
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

So funny that these benchmark websites just post FPS when games are not indicative of real life workloads that Ryzen is displaying. You can't even measure performance in FPS. All my AMD computers just run smoother than Intel.

>>59200179
see >>59200271

>>59196620
>But the reality is anyone with an RX480 can just overclock their cards to be an RX580.

Holy fuck this delusion. RX480 can barely OC to stock 980 levels. What sort of magical vbios and oc you would have to apply in order to get RX 580 levels of performance that, as you claimed, will compete with 1070?

AYYMD REBRANDEON

THE WAY IT'S MEANT TO BE REBRANDED

>Rypoo is a performance FLOP, loses majority of benchmarks to BROADWELL
>RX500 is nothing but REBRANDEONS

AYYMDPOORFAGS CONFIRMED ON SUICIDE WATCH

>>59196308
This x1000

>>59196308
>so 1080 performing the same as the 980ti at the same clockspeed
Not even on any camp. I just want to see some sauce that proves this since evidence suggests Pascal really isn't anything new but a die shrink.

thank you based amd for selling me a sandy bridge equivalent cpu uarch and rehashed gcn in 2017. what a great competitor!!!

>>59196791
Im thinking cause theyed be held back by only 4GB of vram

File: 1280px-Birthday_Paradox.svg.png (49KB, 1280x824px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 1280x824px

>>59188420
In a room with 23 people, there is a 50% chance that someone has the same birthday as you. In a room with 70 people, there is a 99.99% chance that someone has the same birthday as you. That saying, there is definitely someone in this thread who has the same birthday as you.

File: slut.jpg (110KB, 790x720px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 790x720px

>Just buy rypoo and wait™ for vega to get the dream gaming pc
https://youtu.be/SJ87GLfX4lM?t=2m2s

>amd
>not a massive disapo...

We all know, the new cards was not overhypped

>>59188647
this is a falseflagging nigger

File: 1486790079245.gif (2MB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x500px

>>59199389
HAHAHA can't even win in their AMD sponsored game :^)

I picked up a Sapphire R9 Fury for $185 USD. I had a $50 Newegg Gift Card off a soundbar plus a rebate. Feelz gud. Found out about it before I pulled the trigger on a Sapphire Nitro RX 480 8GB for $180 USD.

>>59188343
Will they be better? Will they be cheaper?
Yes?

Then what is the problem?

>>59207870
AMD is usually the best price/performance and longevity. I have a 7970 and 7950 still in service. 3GB w/ boost cards that OC quite well. They spank any Nvidia card they were meant to compete with and then some. GCN was a huge success imo. Drivers improved quite a bit over the years and kept improving. I had to retire my older Nvidia cards that weren't as old because of deprecating hardware/drivers.

File: 1462590232259.jpg (2MB, 1445x6771px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1445x6771px

>>59207931
>Drivers improved quite a bit over the years and kept improving. I had to retire my older Nvidia cards that weren't as old because of deprecating hardware/drivers.

le meme

>>59207973
I'm sure it's more meme for the top tier Nvidia cards like a 970 or 980 but sadly the lower tier and mid range either die outright or choke. You'll understand once you acquire more resources and are able to buy more than one card over the years.

>dying r9 290
so should I just say fuck it and buy a 1070 already?

>>59208113
FUCK NO
1080ti is bumping the 1080 to $500
wait for it son

>>59208094
I upgraded from a 7950 to a GTX970 two years ago, I don't know how can some people still use those lower tier GPUS nowadays unless you're playing games at medium settings or games from 2012 and before.

>>59191274
T H I C C

>>59207973
>proper send-off
>beta driver
HAHAHAHAHAHAH
They're literally fucking with their fanbois because they know what kind if retarded lot they're deling with.
I'm dying here.

>>59203644
>70 people virtually guarantees 1 match
I'm skeptical
We should test this by posting our birthdays

>>59208229
shut up don't say that
you'll be sorry in a couple years when i finally catch up with my driver optimization

>>59208179
Personally I have a home media lab since I have seven other people who require PC time. I generally use a hand me down system with my old card pushed down to the next. Unfortunately I don't buy a new high end GPU every six months or sooner to keep this train running. If you're single no children though it's much easier.

>>59188360
May 31st, here

>:3

>>59208233
Here's the problem.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birthday_problem

>>59203644
I saw that on TV, my brain can't understand that.

>>59191274
THICC

File: 1472286594301.png (293KB, 443x406px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 443x406px

>>59188343
>Rebrandeon

File: received_777341069095977.jpg (140KB, 1080x1794px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 1080x1794px

>>59188343
Fuck me, and I just got this 480

rx 480 8gb or 1060 6gb for adobe?

>>59210790
You need cuda so always go nvidia. Also 1060 will be retarded after 1070 price cut.

>>59210818
Your right desu

>>59210738
That's a good card that should have high asic to boot (gtr variants are usually binned), so just get it to 1400mhz on the core and 2250 on the mem and you shouldn't feel bad about 400 being rebranded.

i don't want to wait any longer, time for XFX 480 lads

>>59210738
Cute legs

>>59188343
>The 500 series the 400 series was rebranded 300 was rebranded 200 was rebranded 7000fuck.
Jesus Christ. Everytime AMD releases new GPUs only the top GPUs are new. It's a shame because I prefer AMD as a GPU brand since Eyefinity has more flexibility then surround, AMD has better legacy driver support, and Nvidia supposedly requires a fucking account or facebook thing for driver updates.

>>59212098
>AMD has better legacy driver support

No, the (7xxx) now don't support the asynchronous shaders. The Nvidia 8xxx support win10

>and Nvidia supposedly requires a fucking account or facebook thing for driver updates

Buuuulshit

>>59188360
Mine too!

>>59212098
Nvidia requires account for their geforce experience which is literally overbloated shadowplay and "automatic game settings optimization" which doesn't optimize games for 99% of the time.

Their drivers is a whole different thing and you can install them separately. I would've known since I've dumped gforce experience over a year ago.

>>59212987
exactly this i remember how shitty was mantle and dx12 support for AMD on my 7850 constantly stuttering, fps drops while rx 2xx, 3xx were working fine, i'm glad i switched to nvidia 1060 6gb last year

2017, the year AMD finally dies.

Thank god.

>>59188343

They need more cash to fund research, they pulled a ghost gen since they dont have the chip die fall out to spread on a price range

I'm surprised they kept the shy currywagon because they need a new image

>>59212987

AHEM

https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/5uhoed/welcome_back_asynchronous_compute_queues_gcn_10/

http://www.bitsandchips.it/52-english-news/8053-welcome-back-asynchronous-compute-queues-gcn-1-0

https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/threads/welcome-back-asynchronous-compute-queues-gcn-1-0.18769595/

https://linustechtips.com/main/topic/738455-gcn-10-async-compute-issue-fixed/

Google shit before saying shit.

>Nvidia rereleases Pascal
>It's fine
>AMD rereleases Polaris
>LOLOLOLOL REBRANDS

>>59210738
The R9 Fury was $220 about the same as the good XfX RX480 version.

>>59215289

The RX 480 has a new architecture, and, by the look of it, he has the 8 GB version.

The R9 Fury would have been an easy recommendation if it weren't for having only 4 GB of HBM and having a really high power consumption in comparison to the RX 480. It's architecture is experimental and not power efficient.

Hopefully, we see a successor the R9 Fury with 8 GB or possibly 16 GB of HBM2 (to compete with Pascal + Volta) in the near future.

>>59215364
4GB of HBM equals about 6-8GB vram anyways.

>>59203644
I was wondering how this was possible but you're just fucking retard

It's not "In a room with 23 people, there is a 50% chance that someone has the same birthday as you"

In a room with 23 people there is 50% chance that 2 RANDOM PEOPLE have the same birthday, not "YOU"

File: ....jpg (22KB, 684x453px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 684x453px

>>59188360

What are the odds...

>>59213861

Which GTX10** series is a rebrand exactly?

>>59210738
good card

>>59191274
T H I C C

>>59196487
join the radeon revolution

File: 1.md.png (118KB, 500x289px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 500x289px

>>59188343
Actually temped to get a good nvidia card for the next 3 or so years but pic related makes pretty hesitant.

This is a lie...

The last announcement had the main pander explicitly saying that it is now a "490, 580, 590 " etc.

It is called VEGA and will not be released with a number.

>>59216535
F I N E
I
N
E

W I N E
I
N
E

>>59189462
>The reason it isn't out yet is precisely to avoid this
AMD could've released Zen much sooner but decided not to, to avoid being the budget option again

And yet their argument in favor of Ryzen is that it's half the price of an i7 chip...

File: rlyson.gif (2MB, 300x290px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 300x290px

>>59207973
Since the new RX line released they have dropped updates like clockwork and have kept their promise of not being shit this time

I hope HBM chips are good because i'd buy the nvida alternative that does not need a water cooler.

The skills are hard core today. First they discredit wffc for being bad about intel now it's fact about amd?

God you're all cucks. When will via rescue us ; - ;

>>59216808
Op talk about 5xx AND Vega. Read the news next time. Retard

File: heatmapbirthdays1.jpg (89KB, 610x885px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 610x885px

>>59203644
This shit theory assumes each day is equally likely, but as >>59191509 stated they are not.

>>59216535
Nothing to do with the 780ti. The 290x/390x drivers are just better now

>>59188360
fuck you and your birthday faggot.

>>59213835
No competition. Enjoy buying the 1180 for $2000

AYYMDPOOJEETS CucKED AND WAITING™

File: 1487035409682.png (437KB, 541x538px) Image search: [Google]

437KB, 541x538px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDaekpMBYUA
;>)

>>59188343
Is rx580 going to have the same terrible TDP as rx480? what about Vega? I wouldn't mind buying rx580 if it has 1060/70 power draw.

>>59188343
But we already knew that?

>>59188360
include me in the party

>>59193551
Why would I care about cards i'm not going to buy?

Who spends 700 bucks on a video card?

>>59220403
You're just jealous I got all these (you)s for it.

Can't wait™ to laugh at amdfags again

File: amdvega.jpg (156KB, 633x758px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 633x758px

>>59188343
DELET

>>59188360
My 26th birthday today and all I'm doing is sitting here shitposting on /g/

>>59224112
Vega is doa. Hbm2 is expensive