RYZEN DOA

File: 1488396296607.jpg (71KB, 552x661px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 552x661px

>>59186602
DELETE

File: amdloo.png (316KB, 882x758px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 882x758px

FAKE JEW NEWS

>6 months from now, AMDrones are going to deny that they ever believed Ryzen would offer twice the performance for half the price, and that it's still a good value like how they hyped up the RX 480 as near GTX 1070 performance for $200, pretended they never did that, and still claim the RX 480 is a good value offering

>>59186602
>iran

hide and sage lads

File: amd.png (42KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 653x726px

>>59186602
SIR DELET

>engineering sample
>lower ram clock

File: 1486816070397.png (234KB, 800x612px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 800x612px

>>59187654
intel's days are numbered and this is these shills are there final breath

File: 1481784777457.jpg (15KB, 348x350px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 348x350px

>muh games
>ryzen is within same fps in all benchmarks at 1080p

>>59187654
This is so fucking true it hurts

>>59187832
>literally makes 600 times bigger profit than AMD
>numbered

Only reason why AMD even exists is because Intel would be fucked by the anti-monopoly laws.

>>59188127
>Only reason why AMD even exists is because Intel would be fucked by the anti-monopoly laws.

This. Intel just keeps AMD around as their little retarded brother so Intel doesn't get investigated for monopoly violations.

File: 05006124.jpg (244KB, 1846x1212px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 1846x1212px

>Trusting Iranians

File: shock.png (49KB, 595x274px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 595x274px

>you're in for a shock. Buckle up

Uh oh

File: 1488408500412.png (91KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 653x726px

>>59188675
Jayz probably meant it in a positive way as in "I can't believe how amazing this CPU is at such low price".

File: 1469877426690.png (124KB, 358x272px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 358x272px

>>59186602
>>59187654
>>59188085
>>59187610
>>59187640
>>59187737
>>59188127
>>59188153
>>59188675
>>59188719
>Random third world shithole coincidentally """leaking""" gaming benchmarks from 2013

Can someone take the "athlon 64 is breddy good, what do we do?" house fire meme but make it say
>Bulldozer is breddy bad, how do we fix it?
>add more cores!
>introducing Ryzen :-DDDDDDDDD
And then instead of a house fire, there's 16 Pajeets shitting on 8 streets.

File: ryzen_test_change - FISHY.png (65KB, 631x471px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 631x471px

>>59188675
>>59188719

File: ZEN.jpg (143KB, 512x960px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 512x960px

>>59190814

you edit this in your paint program.

File: templeOS.gif (16KB, 659x525px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 659x525px

>>59186602
They were doomed from the start with Skylake/Kaby Lake-x dropping in Q2.

They can barely handle a Kaby 4c8t...lol gonna be BTFO x2 in a couple months time.

>>59191399
Thanks, I will when I get home in a few hours.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

>>59186602
Notice how the reviewer only picked
>Old DX11 games that favor intel
>No DX12 games

>>59187654
It was 970 performace they hyped, not 1070 u retard, which is pretty accurate

>>59191608
Nah, the hype train clearly put it around 980 levels and some people expected it to overclock to just under 1070 levels.

>>59186602
>Iranian website ShahrSakhtafzar
you believe this shit?

>>59191399
>zen is 65w and 95w part
>kaby kek future will be 112w

>>59192701
If you really think about it, Iranians will probably want to benefit AMD rather than Intel Jews, so I don't see why they could be lying.

>>59186602
>getting ryzen for the gaymen
holy shit you guys are dumb. The benefits are in pure cost/performance and performance/watt, both of which have ryzen on top, which means actually doing shit will be better. Virtualization and rendering workloads are going to be fucking great, and it's obvious that the chip performs better in benches, games are just coded like shit and don't actually utilize it.

>>59192653
>around 980 levels
not far off, actually

>>59192775

Yeah but muh gaymz are the only thing that matters even though games benefit the most from a graphics card.

>>59186602
They do note, that while the clockspeeds are the same as stock, the cpu itself is an engineering sample. Also, it looks like it was tested using slower ram?

Can't you guys just wait a few more hours for actual third party benchmarks?

I dont get it. These are very good results for AMD, it gets very close to Skylake single thread results and completely beats it in multithreaded benchmarks, not to mention it consistently stays above 144 fps (which would be the most relevant benchmark for the enthusiast gaming market.).

File: 1488421321281.jpg (340KB, 512x949px) Image search: [Google]

340KB, 512x949px

>>59191469
>>59191399
And I'm home. Thanks again.

these numbers look good. only the memory bandwidth is worrying

>>59191399
I only read your shill nonsense for memes like this. Memes are the only reason im still on this dumb board.

>>59192951
it's funny until you realise that the r5 and the r3 lineup exists

>>59192775
Yes, when you're 50 FPS behind in games, and Intel boxes are slapping you around in every possible benchmark, take consolation in the fact that you're getting better performance per watt, just like you do with your 480.

>>59193018
>just wait until the heat death of the universe bro! If you just wait long enough, AMD will put out a competitive product!

>>59193023
>muh gaymes
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA LITERAL CHILDREN!!!!!

>>59186602

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>mfw AMD was the one sponsoring all the fake pre release reviews
>mfw AMD is the jew people said Intel is

HAHAHAHA

I don't get it. It has the same performance at 1080p, beats everything but the 6950x at multithreading and ties at singlethreading with every chip that's not clocked higher. How is it DOA?

>>59191386
>make sure you turn off a few options in GTA V and re-run the tests

>Iranian website using an engineering sample
I mean what.

Voodoo 3dfx here
These threads are fucking hilarious

IDK why /g/ gets so caught up in CPU wars when apparently most of this board hates gamers. For the vast majority of consumers, processors are already powerful enough that people benefit more from reducing power consumption and adding features not directly related to performance than they do from more raw performance. Unless you're a gamer, you should be more excited about laptop APUs or something. Is /g/ suddenly full of video editors and that's why people care so much?

>>59193092
because it's crap at games the only reason people buy high end systems that aren't workstations

>>59193057
it is competitive, the problem has always been drivers
at least nvidia isn't jew enough to not drop prices

>>59193139
>crap
pure exaggeration
it's more than competent enough for games while also having superior multithreading

>>59193139
>It has the same performance at 1080p
How is that "crap at games"?

>>59193180
because it won't overclock well/have weird issues with nvidia GPU.

>>59193138
>IDK why /g/ gets so caught up in CPU wars when apparently most of this board hates gamers.

Because gamer kids crossposting from /v/ are the ones making all these retarded brand fanboy threads.

>>59193195
>Source: My ass.

>>59193205
source: experience

>>59193195
>issues with nvidia gpus
>children actually believe this

>>59191507
don't bother with the games, an old engineering sample, on a validation board, with an admitted ram bug in the bios.

all that against ryzen and it STILL performs that good.

cant wait till people who actually got review hardware and signed an nda show it off.

>>59193138
We like arguing about consumer tech.
AMD APUs always end up in oversized budget laptops. I only buy premium ultrabooks with aluminum casing.

>>59193197
But you can't deny that a shit ton of the people excited about Ryzen are the ones telling gamers to fuck off because Ryzen is apparently a mixed bag for gaming.

>>59193233
it's like mixing coke and pepsi

it just aint right

>>59193195
green and green belong together

>>59193236
>an old engineering sample
This is what people were saying with bulldozer leaks.

>>59193245
>I'm retard that believes unsubstantiated rumors

>>59193236
You forgot originated from some obscure Iranian site. I'm baffled that someone actually thought that this was a credible representation of the hardware. Actually, it's pretty obvious that they're just out to do damage control.

>>59193274
the entire ryzen shitposting scene on /g/ has always been "nu-uh, my questionabable leaks are better than your questionable leaks"

>>59193231
>i have experience overclocking an unreleased chips
Stop it, Rajesh; you're gonna get fired.

>>59193316
more like i'm gonna spit fire on you

>4 year old games
>1377x768 resolution
well done Intel
well done

>>59191386
OH VEY GOY

YOU MUST TEST OUR CPUS IN CINEBENCH ONLY

THEY ARE NOT MEANT FOR GAMES

>>59193082
>mfw AMD is the jew people said Intel is

No shit. AMD has been pulling this scammy marketing since forever and dumbfucks keep falling for it.

>>59193330
>more like i'm gonna spit fire on you
Then you might wanna lie down on the curry for a while

>>59193577
if by marketing, you mean fanboy hype, which exists around any product with competition. All amd really said was that they made vast gains over bulldozer, which by all indications they have.

File: laughing-emoji.png (58KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 256x256px

>intel shills are working overtime

how many pajeetas do intel pay for overtime?

>>59192951

sweet. saved