Ryzen - Gaming Benchmarks

>>59185616
>Only posts DX11 screens and not the DX12 screens.

>>59185616
You always know you're looking at a legitimate benchmark when somebody posts a cropped screenshot, not even naming the site, let alone providing a link to it. :^)

half the price

>>59185649

>Dat delusional MADSHILL

There are DX12 games in that screen.

File: 1485104360444.jpg (71KB, 552x661px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 552x661px

>>59185649
>>59185654
DX12 doesn't stop ryzen being shit Pajeet

File: BSOD_RYZEN_CRASH_CPU_EXPLODES_GONE_NSFW_HOUSEFIRE.webm (2MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x360px

BWAHAHHAHAHAHAA

>>59185616
>140w CPU barely has an edge over 95w CPU

>>59185684
>>59185682
>Those dumb memeing nigger faggots.

Is the NDA over?

File: 5b5.jpg (28KB, 473x386px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 473x386px

>>59185616
the human eye can't react fast enough. you can't see pass 45fps

http://www.humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime

>>59185712

Yeah, Mar 2nd happens in other countries.

File: amd-is-dead.png (2MB, 2560x1312px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2560x1312px

>>59185616
Holy shit

If the 6800K is beating this, the 7700K is going to be a bloodbath

Ryzen is death on arrival

>>59185691
that does look like a stream loss not a BSOD. Windows shits out and says "Something Happened" "We're collecting information and restarting for you"

>>59185682
Herbert's gonna go stalk Chad again

>>59185734
weak bait

File: tmp_3470-1488394810924-1131629138.jpg (386KB, 1301x739px) Image search: [Google]

386KB, 1301x739px

Here's more gaming benchmarks...

>>59185616

Why the fuck would they compare it to a 6800k?
It does worse than a 6700k in the vast majority of gaymes, while costing more, requiring an expensive MB due to a niche socket and consuming nearly 50% more power.

>>59185771


>tfw - my 4 years old, $199 4770K still rocks

>>59185771
>>59185715
>>59185616


DELET DIS NOA

>>59185771
2133MHz RAM against 3300MHz
>HURR DURR RYZEN BTFO
Get the fuck out of here.

>>59185771
>AMD's 2017 8-core getting its shit pushed in by Intel's 2013 4-core

I see Ryzen is business as usual.

>>59185771
AHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA

RYZEN IS THE SHITTIEST GAMING CPU IN EXISTENCE

GETTING BEAT BY A CPU THAT IS $100 CHEAPER

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>59185616
Defend what? The fact that Ryzen is within 5% of performance while being cheaper? Or the fact that I'm not a NEET and don't spend all my free time playing video games like a 12 year old?

Why are you on this board, anyways? Shouldn't you go back to /v/?

File: 1488359952454.png (316KB, 882x758px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 882x758px

>>59185880
B-B-BUT RYZEN WAS SUPPOSED TO BTFO INTEL

DELETE THIS

I wanted to shitpost so I will say


something gaming
something more than 4 cores
something single core performance
something real life applications
something gaming is for childs
something fake benchmarks
something price/perf
something 400$ cpu vs 1000$ one

am I missing something ?

Bulldozer 2.0 confirmed.

>>59185884
AMD fanshits in full damage control

>>59185993
Don't worry, you'll learn when you grow up, stop playing video games and mommy doesn't pay for all your hardcore gayming gear.

>>>/v/

>>59185649
half of the games ar dx12 you literal retard

Zen+ when?

>>59186123
Nice bait

File: 1432831941607.jpg (72KB, 498x703px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 498x703px

>games

Who gives a shit you fucking manchildren.

It does perfectly fine in games but it's obviously not targeted at that. It's a fucking 8 core CPU.

If all you care about are dumbass games just buy a fucking G4600

All this gaming circlejerk around high end CPUs is fucking retarded and has to stop. High end CPUs are way overkill for gaming.

>>59186123
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_games_with_DirectX_12_support

File: 1469310945769.jpg (195KB, 553x936px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 553x936px

>>59186140
>the AMD wait cycle begins anew

>>59186140

Q2-Q3 in 2018

>>59186143
>>59186167
i was meaning in the picture. did you even bother to look who i was replying to before getting triggered

File: amd.png (42KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 653x726px

>>59185616
Only curry ice cream on hoRYZON

File: 1488335165972.jpg (66KB, 568x612px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 568x612px

>>59186179
ITS OK THIS ONE WAS JUST A TEST RUN

WAIT UNTIL THE NEXT AMD CPU

SURELY THAT ONE WILL BTFO INTEL

>>59185616
Exactly what was expected, there's no disappointment.

>>59185616
>An 8 core CPU with a lower TDP can compete with a CPU with fewer cores in applications that don't even use all 8 cores

Is this supposed to make Ryzen look bad, or what?

>>59186199
Reboot yourself

>>59185771
HAHAHHAAHAHAHHAGAHAHAHA MY FUCKING 4770 IS A TAD SLOWER THAN A FUCKING 1700X

These CPU don't overclock well at all thanks to so many cores.
And even if you overclock it, the power demand skyrockets.

Will wait for serious reviews tomorrow, but I am not an IQ89 like most of the people on the internet.

I will buy the Ryzen 7 1700 IF

1.It's confirmed to have a soldered HS

2.Turning off a few cores won't affect gaming performance much, but will enable lower CPU power dissipation.

3.The Boxed cooler is not too loud and cools decently.

>>59186225
>>59186223

In gaming benchmarks, the 4 years old 4770K beats rypoo easily. What the fuck....

You guys fell for bulldozer 2.0

>>59185771
>absolutely no >4 core optimized games and all games presented put no real strain on the CPU
These scores are meaningless and within the margin of shittier RAM.

This looks more like a benchmark named

2133 MHz memory vs 3200 MHz memory

>>59186252
>In gaming benchmarks

Good thing I'm not 12 years old and don't give a fuck about "gaming benchmarks" then

http://www.pcgamer.com/amd-ryzen-7-1800x-hits-52-ghz-breaks-benchmarking-record/

Uh. It's half the price and ALMOST as powerful. That's kind of the point

>>59186304

Nice, how will it affect gaming and the daily stuff? Nothing.

>>59185616
>5 fps difference
k

File: 1483622050789.jpg (70KB, 428x392px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 428x392px

>2133MHz vs 3200MHz

File: frogforce.png (561KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

561KB, 1500x1000px

>>59186021
AMD fanshits in über damage control

>>59186247
>The power demand skyrockets
It's being compared to a 140W CPU, if it gets to 120 watts I'll eat my hat

>>59185616
>99% of the performance
>at 50% the cost
>with a lower tdp
Yep amd btfo alright

>>59186304
I hope that was an ironical post.

>dismissing gaming benches

>post a link to extreme overclocking, totally insignificant

File: 1434654609552s.jpg (6KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 225x225px

>>59186347
>>59186323
>game "developers" are too incompetent to use extra power a CPU with 8 cores offers.
>even so that 8 core cpu is basically neck and neck with lower core higher clock CPUs
>this is supposed to make AMD look bad somehow

Besides, I don't give a fuck about games. I actually work and for work the Ryzen is so far ahead of anything Intel is offering it's not even funny.

If games were the gold standard of CPU development then we'd all be using single core CPUs clocked at 5ghz. Games are totally irrelevant for CPU discussion.

>>59186330
It's only half the price if the person thought those shitty Broadwell-E CPUs were considered.


Otherwise, the competition on the broader market are clearly the Skylakes/Kaby Lakes.

>>59185803
tfw

>>59185616
looks great
you can run like 20 of those at the same time & get that fps vs 1-2 at same time for intel

>>59185771
>some sort of ahllau Akbar language
Disregarded with a vengeance

>>59186391
And do you have benchmarks against those

Also one thing to remember is that the Ryzen OC app let's you disable individual cores.

So if you REALLY care that much about a few extra FPS in games you can disable 4 cores and OC the remaining ones to 4.5ghz and have the same gaming performance as Intel chips

>>59185616
CANT HEAR YOU OVER THE PREORDER SHIPMENT ARRIWING TOMORROW

Too bad your single parent mom can't give you large enough allowance for you to enjoy the 8 core performance as well, NOT

>>59186343
>I don't care about gaming
>Yeah, but that won't affect gaming performance!

Why do you gamer kiddies think PCs are only for gaming? Go buy a console or something instead

DELET THIS

not optimized yet

>>59185616
what's the problem? Just wait for Zen+
They have a good foundation now and can improve base on this

>>59186371
>Overclocking is insignificant for productivity tasks like rendering

Go back to /v/

>you fell for the Ryzen meme
>managed to cancel the 1700 pre-order
>site is not letting you cancel the AM4 motherboard one
I FUCKING HATE YOU SO GOD DAMN MUCH /g/, I should have know better I have that fucking awful ATH M50x thanks to your memes but I actually thought Ryzen wasn't going to be shit
FUCK YOU

>>59186415
You're also forgetting these things use much less power, power is heat, so you can already overclock these things higher then you might traditionally imagine

I don't understand why anyone is cheering for a company to fail. Do you like paying higher prices?

>>59186448
>1800x Ryzen confirmed for crashing at 4.1 on water
>y-you can overclock it

>>59186442


Sure, waitfag

>>59186411
See >>59185771

It's an absolute bloodbath. AMD's $400 Ryzen chip is getting beat by Intel's $300 chip.

>>59186458
After Zen fuck yes I want AMD to fail.
They just lie about everything and never deliver. I hope their CEO dies and the company gets sued into bankruptcy for misleading its shareholders

>>59186446

>preordering anything ever

haha

idiot

you get what you deserve

>All these shills.

Yeesh, Intel must really really be scared of Ryzen, aren't they?

>>59186446
>Hardware preorder
Woah dood, get cucked.

>>59186475
This desu senpai. AMD's marketing is so misleading it should be criminal.

>>59186481
>>59186498
FUCK YOU

>>59186460
If you disable 4 or 6 cores you'll be able to get a huge OC on the remaining ones.

And the OC app lets you change profiles with the press of a button.

What anyone with half a brain will do is have a profile with 8 cores for work/multitasking/well optimized games and a profile with 2 or 4 cores at significantly higher clocks for unoptimized games.

>>59186467
>middle eastern mudshit site
Into the trash it goes

>no source
No need to defend what doesn't exist

>>59186507
>disable 6 cores to get the same performance of the cheaper 7700k
t-thanks

>>59186446

>Fury hype train
>Bulldozer hype train
>Bulldozer 2.0 (aka Rypoo) hype train
>Not notice a pattern

That's your problem.

>>59186517
I fucking hate you and this board

>>59186515
Except the 7700k can't magically go to 8 cores when you need it to.

>>59185771
Thanks, ISIS

>>59185771
>dx11
>still average fps is barely under any other chip

looking good

>>59186534
Nice fishing fag, you got a ton of (You)s.

>have a i5 4670
>only games that ever bottleneck do it for lack of cores
>everything else runs fine at 60+ fps
fuck it I don't care, I'm getting my 1700 for less than what it would cost me to get a 7700k and I won't ever notice any issues while gaming because I only play at 60fps
meanwhile I'll be encoding shit almost twice as fast

>>59186549
not when the 1700x is $400
theres no reason to go AMD if these benchmarks are true

>/v/ kiddies are arguing about which 6/8 core CPU is the best for gaming when 99% of games don't use more than 4 cores and don't just buy a quad core and put the money saved on a better GPU

I thought you had to be 18 years old to post on 4chan?

File: Y0UJC.png (208KB, 680x880px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 680x880px

>>59186446
>he fell for the AMD shills

>>59186573
There's no reason to go i7 either if all you care about is games you mongloid.

There's no reason to go beyond an i3 or a pentium for gaming.

>>59186540
>Except the 7700k can't magically go to 8 cores when you need it to.
>when you need it to
NOBODY needs more than 4c 8t

>>59186573
You'd go AMD if you multitask. These are workstation CPUs being compared to gaming CPUs cunt.

>>59186588
I responded to a post comparing FPS you fucking jackass. Nowhere does it mention anything other than gaming.

File: giphy.gif (1MB, 480x287px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 480x287px

>>59186596

>>59186579
>buy Tales of Berseria
>it literally only uses one core
even 4 cores is a meme

>>59185616
Let me guess this is one of those "call us first" """reviews""""

>>59186604
>Orange Doritos Hitler.gif
kill urself

File: r7g7tL-CA8yBZsCno29tMRdBpIhiCmInoHsjckvDenA.jpg (107KB, 528x837px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 528x837px

you guys are so fucking stupid, competition is good -> lower price and more inovation

According to idiotic gaming benchmarks the best CPU win the world would be a 5.5GHz single core.

Which perfectly illustrates why games are useless as a CPU benchmark.

Multithreaded linux kernel compilation benchmarks when

Let's see babby lake beat an 1800X at that

>>59186573
I render videos 90% of the time while I game

also do a lot of other shit simultaneously

as majority of people do. Because 2+ monitors is normal these days.

streaming + gaming
youtube + gaming
all will benefit a lot.

>gaming benchmarks

I'm still getting Ryzen for video editing, compositing, and other CPU heavy tasks.

>>59185616
Doesn't matter. It'll wreck i5 and i3.

File: knnsbramannen.jpg (29KB, 330x357px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 330x357px

>only CPU intense stuff I do is gaymen
>bought 6700k on the cheap amidst the Ryzen hype
>starting to get worried after the bombastic synthetic benchmarks start emerging
>turns out when it comes to gaymen, Ryzen performs pretty much identically to the last three or so generations of 4c/8t Intel chips while costing more

>>59186389
Hello Pajeet, we just sent you 0.2$ via Paypal.
Thanks for working with AMD.

File: amd nvidia.jpg (839KB, 2084x1356px) Image search: [Google]

839KB, 2084x1356px

I was holding opinion that anything better than sandy bridge level would be great

this is far better than I expected, if true

I am mighty fine with how ryzen turned out, and would buy it over intels offering if I were on the market

File: checkem.jpg (84KB, 700x512px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 700x512px

>oh wow it loses on the last gen DX11
>ignore the DX12 performance goy

intel shills are truly out in full force.

>>59186646
Yeah competition is good, but this is not competition

File: 1408543297950-559d0048a8f5a.png (29KB, 633x758px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 633x758px

>>59185616

IT'S NOT FAIR BROS, IT'S NOT FAIR

>>59186650
I pre-ordered 1700X a week ago on amazon prime so a week at most for my shit and I'll do some loonix benches. I'll make a thread and run any script anyone wants that does any type of benches / prime calcs

I found the claims of AMD beating Intel to be incredulous. How can a company with 1/60th the revenue of the other, come out with a superior product? It just defies logic. Granted, they had to hire a wizard computer engineer to even get this close.

But let's be honest here, Intel stopped trying after Sandy Bridge. They didn't have to compete or innovate because computers because computers have been fast enough to be 'facebook machines' for a decade now. I commend AMD for getting this close, but all it will accomplish is to get Intel to finally tell their R&D team to come out with another 'Sandy Bridge'. They're going to re-focus on IPC now, and come out with something that will again leave AMD comfortably in the dust.

All that AMD has accomplished, is to nudge Intel to maybe try again. In 2 years, we'll get something that's like 30-40% stronger than "Zen+".

>>59186665
>it'll wreck CPUs that are $200 cheaper

OK...

File: ryzen_test_change.png (65KB, 631x471px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 631x471px

Day 1 "true" Ryzen benchmarks might not happen. AMD is telling websites/YouTube reviewers to change how they review Ryzen 1 day before it releases.

>>59186741
SHUT IT DOWN

DON'T LET THEM TEST GAMES

RYZEN CAN ONLY BE ACCURATELY TESTED ON CINEBENCH

File: slight panic.jpg (229KB, 627x720px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 627x720px

>>59186741
>CPUS NEED PATCHES TO WORK PROPERLY

>>59186741

It means that these gaming benchmarks images posted are true.

MADSHILLS on suicide watch

>intelcucks reduced to backwarter iranian benchmarks at laptop resolutions
Are you kidding me

>>59186766
>resolution matters when benchmarking cpus

>>59185616
hahahaha

>>59186762
well obviously...
if the drivers/firmwares are all shite the end result will also be shite

>>59186715
>How can a company with 1/60th the revenue of the other, come out with a superior product?
because in R&D you don't get returns proportionate to the amount of cash you invested

it's also highly likely Intel is only dedicating a minority of its resources to the x86 desktop

>It just defies logic.
>"my 30 seconds of uninformed deduction is immaculate logic"
you must be from /pol/

>But let's be honest here, Intel stopped trying after Sandy Bridge.
they actually stopped trying after Haswell

>but all it will accomplish is to get Intel to finally tell their R&D team to come out with another 'Sandy Bridge'
which could take years and yield another Netburst or Itanium tier disaster

I don't know why everybody expects Intel to effortlessly pull a miracle out of their ass. in any case, they can just slash Kaby Lake prices and be competitive for a long time.

your speculation is worth precisely nothing, mate

>>59186762
Welcome to 20 years ago? Intel patches their CPUs with microcode all the time.

>>59185771
I fucking knew it, the average consumer has literally no reason to buy this chip.

>>59186789
If resolution doesn't matter why not test it at standard resolutions, 1080,1440, and 4K :^)

>>59186741
even Intel phoned reviewers this week, basically asking them remind fans that they're still good at X and Y

many tech press people said it was completely normal and usual

if it's okay for Intel to do it, it should be okay for AMD to do it

>>59186827
Because you want to avoid hitting GPU bottlenecks while testing CPU performance, retard

>>59186571
What if I told you that your 4670 is better than any ryzen chip for gayman ?

>>59186858
you would be dead fucking wrong

>>59185736

The Vega presentation had a CTD too...

Why the fuck some people still buy AMD trash?

Is that the geeky version of whiteknighting?

>>59186858
I'd call you a filthy kike shill, kike.

>>59186827
Low resolution isolates the CPU performance

>>59186741

Of course GamersNexus fucking Jayz ass with reality.

>What the fuck you mean I gotta actually test this shit, instead of running canned benchmarks?

>>59185771

well lads, looked like AMD memed us again

It's over!! AMD is finished and bankrupt!!!!

Vega probably turns out to be a crappy overpriced inferior overdue GPU card

>>59186886
It stinks though, AMD telling people they can only test their CPUs in a certain way? Something isn't right.

>>59186857
you're going to be hitting GPU bottlenecks pretty much all the time in real life though

>>59186741
You think they might manipulate DF into not doing their regular cpu tests ?

File: 1471019751343.jpg (26KB, 480x712px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 480x712px

>>59185771
>the OC'd version is only shown when Intel beats it

Interesting...

>>59186873

Because I'm cheap. I don't think a CPU is worth the amount Intel wants for it while AMD is in line with what I care to pay.

>>59186878
>let's ignore real world resolutions goy

File: 1481377328591.jpg (39KB, 240x226px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 240x226px

>2133MHz vs 3200MHz

>>59186741
tbqh gamers nexus is the only reviewer i trust nowdays, theyre very thorough with their testing.

File: 57uh567ujuk.jpg (10KB, 205x246px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 205x246px

>>59185616

WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS SHIT

I PREORDERED THE 1700X

>>59186912

That's not what he said at all. He's basically bitching about having to work because a setting change or a firmware update actually proves real tangible results.

They aren't dictating how to test, just what to test.

>>59186949
guru3d and hardwarecanucks deserve a mention IMO

>>59186803
>because in R&D you don't get returns proportionate to the amount of cash you invested

But it does help to have billions of dollars to throw around. If AMD steals significant enough market share, Intel will immediately re-prioritize their funds towards the x86 development teams. They can throw money at the problem and find talent - their own engineering wizards.

>you must be from /pol/
why is /pol/ a boogeyman on almost all boards? that hiroshima guy needs to word filter pol, it's becoming a serious non-sequitur meme response. Also, you act as if they came out of a vacuum, I only started going on there after moot created the board, I was here before they were even a thing.

>they actually stopped trying after Haswell
Depends, on how strict you want to be on putting an exact timeline, but the argument that since Sandy, all we've been seeing is 5% increments is correct. But yes, it's even worse now, with there being NO increase on Kaby.

>which could take years and yield another Netburst or Itanium tier disaster

Now that is just pure speculation -- wishful thinking on your part. They literally have Jews working for them in Israel. I'm sure they can pull one miraculous 'tock' again before 7nm and the end of silicon lithography.

>>59186923
Yes, and most people play games at 60fps and don't need anything more than intel current x600 non K or the lowest AMD 6c
You benchmark to show performance so you need to test in best possible scenario to showcase said performance

>>59186956
See>>59186517

>>59186962
i'll watch guru3d but i usually go to hardwarecanucks for cases, i know it sounds retarded.

>>59186958
Uhh he said AMD is telling them to change the testing methodology

He didn't say anything about a firmware or software update

It's very fishy

>>59186956

No you didn't.

>>59186846

That's not the problem... the issue is that AMD has told them 1 day before Ryzen releases. Now all the benchmarks and tests they've done down to a T have to be re-done according to AMD's new guidelines they sent out a day before Ryzen launches.

>>59185616
What i get from this image is DX12 is trash

Also "cheap" CPU can do pretty much the same as an expensive one.

>>59186975

>It's a conspiracy

Jayz doesn't test shit confirmed, he just runs benchmarks and plugs Lego pieces and invents a computer.

>>59186517
This desu senpai

Anyone who trust AMD now is just stupid

>>59187019

Anyone who trusts any company is stupid.

>low clock 8 core CPU vs low clock 8 core CPU
Worthless benchmarks, Jesus Christ

Show me 4.0ghz benchmarks for CPUs that cost $300 or less. THOSE are gaming benchmarks

>>59187039
Well Ryzen CPUs are all $350+

But there's a $300ish Intel tested here >>59185771

>>59186956
wait until tomorrow and if it's terrible, cancel or return it

>>59186975
what's fishy about training reviewers to get the best results possible?

do you really think AMD could get away with bribing them? that would be a much better story to sell than Ryzen benchmarks.

>>59186965
>But it does help to have billions of dollars to throw around. [...] They can throw money at the problem and find talent - their own engineering wizards.
then please tell me why their billions of dollars and their current engineering talent can't put a dent in ARM?

this is some of the most advanced science known to man. there are no rules for progressing onwards; nothing to be predicted of tech that doesn't fucking exist yet. IBM could have the next big silicon breakthrough for all we know.

Intel is as likely to make a huge leap forward as AMD was to do so with Zen. perhaps even less likely, since there's nobody for them to catch up to.

>Now that is just pure speculation -- wishful thinking on your part.

do you not see the extreme irony in this? I am literally telling you NOT to succumb to wishful thinking by presenting a plausible scenario in contrast to yours.

gotta give it to you, your vocabulary makes you sound much smarter than you actually are.

I do gaming only at 60Hz max. And a lot of video enconding and multi-threaded tasks.
Does this matter to me and my future 1700?

>>59187019
Buying AMD and going around saying competition is good.
Is the equivalent of recycling.
They buy inferior AMD products, so that intel has to slightly drop prices for normal people to enjoy actually good performing chips

>>59187086
>training reviewers to get the best results possible

Do you realize how Orwellian that sounds?

"Yes you can test our CPU, but only test it how we tell you to test it."

>>59187004
probably sucks to be a journo right now but I'm seriously wondering what they could be alluding to.

what would AMD want to rectify a day before release? why the urgency?

my main guess is they've either got something that could get better results out of benchmarks, or they're trying to avoid a mistake reviewers might make (or bad defaults on mobo firmware) that would cause Ryzen to underperform tomorrow.

they don't want another RX 480 situation again.

>>59187152
It's the same thing Intel has been doing for years.

File: Screenshot from 2017-02-12 18-13-32.png (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>>59186648
It would be a dual core with H/T to take care of one main thread for rendering, one for other tasks, and HT for chrome and whatever background processes are running. In other words, the 7350K is the best CPU ever invented.

>>59187152
how the fuck does your brain work? AMD has absolutely no control over who reviews their shit once it hits retail shelves. at best they can have a day or two of "false" journalism before the truth hits everybody and people start returning their chips wholesale. it would be a PR and logistics disaster big enough to fucking kill them.

what they're doing is telling reviewers how to tweak their hardware for the best possible results, because they want the tech press to represent it at peak performance from day 1.

it's possible they didn't even know the shit they're telling journos now before today either. they're cutting it really close with this launch.

>>59187175
We're not the moral police here it doesn't matter fag

File: shock.png (49KB, 595x274px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 595x274px

>you're in for a shock. Buckle up

What did he mean by this?

>>59187229
what matters is you're a dumb reactionary /v/ shit drawing wild conclusions about stuff he does not understand

>>59187243
He is a friend of Mike Pence and hates faggots

>>59187243
It's either better then what we are excepting, or way worse than what we are currently speculating.

>>59187243

That he's a fat ass lazy piece of shit not worth the clicks with questionable advice.

>>59185616
Looks fucking great

The 1400X will be an amazing AM4 entry CPU

>>59187067
Yes, with AMD using slower ram and engineering sample version. (with boost disabled, cmiiw)
Did you even read the post or just seeing this images without cross checking?
This is why fanboyism are bad.

>>59187314
if they can get it to clock high enough

>>59187112

No..It's exactly what you need in a processor.

>>59187317
Where does it say slower RAM and engineering sample?

>>59187339
https://videocardz.com/66684/amd-ryzen-7-1700x-review-leaks-out
check their picture of tested cpu and cpu-z shots for ram speed.

>>59187339
Here
https://videocardz.com/66684/amd-ryzen-7-1700x-review-leaks-out
correct me if I'm wrong tho, since they said it's 3200 DDR4 but the screenshot in CPU-Z it isn't

>>59187086
I was about to research some articles, in preparation to type out a long worded response, but you seem too much of a zealot to take in outside thinking and do reasoning of your own. I'm wasting time on you.

Wishful thinking is projecting that someone will crack, say, quantum computing in the next decade, or two, even. x86 is not yet fully mature, I'm confident that Intel will have a proper response to Zen in a couple of years -- and I'm saying this as a person, who will most likely buy Zen because I can't wait until that time. I'm not* ideologue like you. I'm pragmatic.

>>59186825
The average consumer has no reason to buy a desktop computer. The average consumer is not as retarded as you are.

>>59187408
>I was about to research some articles
no you weren't. this is blatant damage control

you are a self-absorbed imbecile with below-average reading comprehension and a complete inability to properly detect his own hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance

>>59187339
>>59187396
Also the motherboard they are using is also a microstar ES board not a retail board with possible old microcode. Their bench results are similar to the ones leaked by canardpc month ago, they also tested ES samples.

>>59187396
>>59187397
The RAM was probably JEDEC rated to 2133Mhz and they never changed the settings in the BIOS

Also how can you tell the boost is disabled?

R7 1700 is $329, roughly the same price as an i7-7700

What I want to see is an R3 1400x at 4.5 GHz vs an i7-7700k at 4.5 GHz

File: 20-AIDA64-Memory-Bandwidth[1].png (99KB, 650x380px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 650x380px

>>59187397
here you have the ram

>>59187458
Sticks and stones may break my bones...

Also, even if I did in fact, have those characteristics, are they really a marker for failure? Just have a look at God Emperor Trump. That guy is everything you said and more, and he holds the highest office in the land. Praise be to Kek. Meme magic is real...

>>59187488
I would rather see them with the same cooler overclocked until reachin som set temperaturen, such as 70C. If one has better overclocking but the other has better ipc then your test would be misleading. My test only leaves out motherboard differences.

File: worthlessfuckingshills.png (535KB, 2560x1080px) Image search: [Google]

535KB, 2560x1080px

When we talk about reviewers I expect Hardware Unboxed to go full shill mode for AMD.

They're literally most obnoxious AMD cunts in existence. Their recent "Is it still worth it to buy 980 Ti" video compared Fury X against 980 Ti with updated benchmarks. The shill part of it was removing "AMD/Nvidia optimized games" from updated benchmarks which meant removing Doom where Fury has the lead AND WHOLE 6 games where 980 Ti showed 20-30 fps more and then call it a day by doing a round up of the rest.

When I pointed it out they simply removed my comment and blocked me. Seriously, don't ever trust Hardware Unboxed

Pic related: Orange titles are the ones that weren't included in updated average fps round up to make AMD look better. They don't even hide it.

>>59186596
>nobody needs more than 2gb vram
>nobody needs more than 4gb ram
>>>/2005/>>>

>>59187243
>you're in for a shock. Buckle up
What a heauxmeaux. Jay is always trying to manufacture some fucking clickbaity bullshit about AMD stuff.

GamersNexus is the only channel worth watching. Those dudes know their shit and tell it like it is. I'll be looking forward to their review.

>>59185771

FUCKING HOW?????

>>59187584
Tbh vram is a fucking meme and nobody outside of AMD shills that didn't even own 970 ever experienced the "VRAM bottleneck". I think this myth came from retarded AMD shills that were always advocating for vram since that's all their garbage cards had going for (AMD going for 4GB of vram when most Nvidia cards had 2 or 3, going for 8 when most had 4 etc.) and the fact that idiots think cards like RX 480 4GB are slower than the 8GB version because of amount of vram, they're not. They're slightly slower because of the cheaper shitter ram used in cheaper GPU alterations.

>>59187575
That's fucked up. Those are some popular games they are leaving out too.

>>59187575
I'll be sure to post his reviews on /g/ to rue /v/babies like you.

>NVIDIA also revealed an upcoming Game Ready Driver optimized for DirectX 12 games. The company refined code in the driver and worked side by side with game developers to deliver performance increases of up to 16 percent on average across a variety of DirectX 12 games, such as Ashes of the Singularity, Gears of War 4, Hitman, Rise of the Tomb Raider and Tom Clancy’s The Division

oh boy.. and then there's this too

File: terry.jpg (10KB, 233x267px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 233x267px

B T F O
T
F
O

>>59185670
/thread

>>59187681
I don't believe it. Fuck off with your "magical async driver" meme. People were expecting one since 2014.

>>59187471
I don't know about the boost, it may be on.

>>59187681
Will this work on Maxwell or no?

>>59186803
>you must be from /pol/

>have to shoehorn /pol/ into everything because you're assmad but have no counter-arguments
kek

>>59187719
>>59187697
>http://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-announces-gameworks-dx12
I think it's mainly for pascal

File: 1479693614883.jpg (66KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 600x450px

>>59187284

>>59187774

The presentation from yesterday says it supports Pascal and Maxwell.

File: 231.jpg (81KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 1280x720px

>>59187774
>>59187697
>>59187777

If that's the case then AMD's GPU department might as well start thinking about producing washing machines and microwaves instead. 480 was bad enough and its only argument was the dx12 meme. Now it's literally pointless to own one.

>>59186252
Are you blind?
Bulldozer had 40% less performance at 1080p. Ryzen has 10% less performance at meme 768p and has roughly the same performance at 1080p.

>>59186762
More like BIOS updates you tard

>>59187651
Photoshop skills

>>59186344
the i7 also cost 50 buck more

>>59188029
Sadly it's real

https://videocardz.com/66684/amd-ryzen-7-1700x-review-leaks-out

>>59188030
No it doesn't, it's literally $10 more

>>59187488
You'll have to wait™

File: 11541521.webm (1MB, 596x336px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 596x336px

>>59185771
>DX 11

>>59187726
nah mate that's just what the entire world thinks of you and your echo room

>>59185771
>based on an engineering sample
Ayy lmao

File: molyneux stefan identifying arguments.jpg (58KB, 598x792px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 598x792px

>>59188149
>same problem

>222 replies
>No source cited yet
OP could have made this in Excel

>>59188410

Does it look like a spreadsheet to you, waitfag?

>>59188410
http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/first-ryzen-7-1700x-review-finds-its-way-onto-the-web.html

>>59188485
who cares? no source whatsoever

But I can see you don't understand english very well pajeet, so I'll explain to for you: Since there are no sources, It wouldn't make any difference if it was made in excel or in any other program, it's still fake

File: image.png (224KB, 778x960px) Image search: [Google]

224KB, 778x960px

>>59185771

>>59186467
>It's an absolute bloodbath. AMD's $400 Ryzen chip is getting beat by Intel's $300 chip.
>A CPU clocked lower thanks to 8 cores performs slightly worse in singlethread
who fucking knew!

>>59188588
Look above you and think about how retarded you are

>Gaming benchmarks
ayyy lamo fuck off to /v/

File: btfo.jpg (133KB, 1134x877px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 1134x877px

>>59186741

DELET DIS

nothing to see here, move along folks!

>>59185649
DX12 games usually use less cpu because they take more advantage of hw acceleration

>>59188601
>IT'S A BEAST CPU FOR PRODUCTIVITY, GAYMEN IS FOR LITTLE KIDS, GROW UP FAGGOTS, FINALLY AN 8C/16T FOR A DECENT PRICE
>proceeds to buy a 7700k or sit on his older Intel CPU for a couple more years because nothing but gaymen ever brings his CPU usage over 20%

/g/ - Technology

>>59188749
The average gamer doesn't have only the game, steam and a frame monitoring software open while gaming. Benchmarks are good performance measurements, but not real world ones.

>>59187971
Microcode is included in the BIOS, you can still update your CPU microcode within Windows/Linux in case your motherboard manufactured never bother to release a new BIOS with updated Microcode or for companies that don't want to do the chore of having to update BIOS for every machine they have.

I do this with my 4690K.

>>59188726
An Vulkan games are so CPU dependent that they are unplayable on AMD CPUs...

>>59187636
Hes not manufacturing anything. I'm friends with a certain wop, he just got his review kit a while ago, and the memory performance on Ryzen is top notch. The BIOS update addresses a slight latency issue, and the bandwidth AMD is achieving at those low latencies is astounding.

A 3600mhz DDR4 kit with tight timings will show 54GB/s actual usable bandwidth, and max latency is in the neighborhood of 60ns. Thats without tweaking anything. The IMC is so robust it can handle high speed kits with tight timings, and run them at 1T command rate.

>>59185692
50W more
$150 more

for 0.6-4% FPS gain (in DX11)

PHEW

>>59185616
AMDICKLETS BLOWN THE FUCK OUT

>>59189220
>wattage matters
are you living in africa where you count your watts from your solar panels?

>>59189265
>all of a sudden perf/watt doesn't matter

Lol you shills are desperate

>>59185771
bulldozer 2.0 incoming

>>59189346
>all of a sudden
it never mattered so good try amdicklet.

File: moar-cores.jpg (96KB, 608x369px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 608x369px

>>59189365
BUT IT HAS MOAR CORES

>>59186969
Of that's the case then you would be doing synthetic benchmarks

>>59187067
Ryzen 7's, the 8 cores
Lower core versions are all below 300 if random leaks are to be trusted

File: 212a45c24293f33be10cdb384e65be10-1200-1422.png (346KB, 1200x1422px) Image search: [Google]

346KB, 1200x1422px

Blah, screw Ryzen and Bulldozer. Phenom II was AMD's crowning glory. I'm one of the lucky 95 watt Phenom II x 4 955 owners. Means I get lower power consumption and high performance. No compromising. No software/gaming compatibility issues. It'll run Unreal Tournament (1999),NOLF (2000), Q3A (1999),etc, plus modern applications without fail. Unlike bulldozer and this new Ryzen chip. AMD should've stuck with the Phenom design and just shrunk the manufacturing process and increased the clocks/core count. But they didn't and thus amd's massive failure. Intel is good, they saw amd's failure and took advantage. So stick with Phenom II or if your on intel platform, stick with intel.

>>59189511
Yeah but when are those even coming out?

>>59189716
Q2, apparently yields on the Zeppelin die are so good there's not enough chips to launch the lower core versions

>>59189710
I upgraded to an FX 8350 from a 8350 when it first came out and noticed absolutely no difference.

>>59189793
I meant from a 965 to an FX 8350**

>>59188054
>sadly it's real
>Videocardz

Yea.. sure.

>>59185616
>madshills, defend this shit
AMD IS CHEAPER AND GETS ROUGHLY THE SAME PERFORMANCE

>>59185734
How many times have you posted this image now?

>>59186949
GN is on the road for over a decade alreadly. They don't play bulshit.

>>59189814

It is struggling to beat 4 years old Intel 4770K.

SAD

>>59187575
Their english is so bad that I can't understand what they say so I don't even bother.

>>59187243
He is mad he wasnt invited to the Press conference to get his ryzen sample, then AMD contacted him and sent him the CPUs to testing, he probably is pretty lost since he showed many times that he can't even install windows in his machine.

>>59189092
But that isn't true...

>>59185670

those 2 cpus cost the same here in germany
(440 €)

File: speccy.png (52KB, 835x678px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 835x678px

If AMD new line of CPU is this close, even if its not better the price difference still means a lot. A 6800K costs more than a 1700X, and if the difference is 5% or less I don't see it as an issue.

Pic related is my PC. No shilling, just observations.

>>59189766

Expect higher clocks on the lower end chips than leaked. Expect at least a few 6c chips being unlockable to 8. Good guy AMD strikes again.

>>59186699
What is it shitposting?

I think this is actually better than a lot of people were expecting, i think the opinion was "so long as it gets within 10-20% its good enough" and now people are starting shit over 2-5% difference.

File: wat.gif (2MB, 236x224px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 236x224px

>>59190021
>Good guy AMD

>>59190036
People were originally expecting something to compete with Sandy Bridge, and it turns out that they're only 6% behind Kaby Lake per clock in Cinebench.

>>59189973
At 4K is shown that a beefier CPU can deliver more frames than a 4c/8t with the same GPU.

>>59190036
>"so long as it gets within 10-20% its good enough"

Jesus AMDtards will literally eat shit if poojeet tells them too

>>59190021
I really don't expect unlockable chips since they stated lazering off cores, unless /ourgirl/ Lisa Su goes full bro

>>59190138
They started*

When will the fuking nda be lifted?

>>59185906
I want a hat that says 8 Core

>>59190188
Tomorrow

It's going to be a bloodbath

>>59186345
>nerfing Ryzen because Intel is complete garbage
The jews really fear the samurai don't they?

>>59190188
Apparently 9am tomorrow morning. Central time.
Already have two chips on their way here, apparently arriving around noon.

I'm going to sit back and drink all morning as I watch the tears and shitposts from intel fanboys reach critical mass. Having already seen a review its going to be hilarious.

>>59190105

Intel cucks will take the biggest cocks like good goy.

>>59190217
Screenshotting this

You really should not have written that lol

>>59190217
What I coincidence I'll be doing the same except it will be AYYMDrones tears I'll be looking forward to.

>>59186460
Haha and that was on the xfr overclock too!

>>59188902
>The average gamer doesn't have only the game, steam and a frame monitoring software open while gaming
...yeah, they do. And if they don't then they have maybe a browser without much going on, which will have very little impact in the background.
>hurr I need 8 more threads because in the "real world" I might have my browser open in the background
why is everyone on this board so dumb now

>>59188749
>proceeds to buy a 7700k or sit on his older Intel CPU for a couple more years because nothing but gaymen ever brings his CPU usage over 20%
I reencode every anime I watch to play on my tv

>>59185616
+/- 6 fps and you are talking shit, really? rofl

>>59190244
>>59190242
Delta idle to load on the 1700 is 65w. Delta for the 1800x is 100w~
Perf/watt is generally higher than Broadwell-E in most everything.
L1 figures are extremely close to Skylake/Kaby Lake.
Ryzen has more L2 and L3 bandwidth.
NB freq is 3000mhz, and there is a lot of adjustability when it comes to the caches and IMC.
It has better system memory bandiwidth as well, it scales better with higher clocked DIMMs than intel systems do.
CB scores are pretty much exactly what has been shown, and most leaks were pretty spot on, save for marginal perf increases from microcode updates.
Anyone building a system may want to wait a week or two unless you want to flash your BIOS a couple times in the near future.

You shouldn't have doubted Keller.

Disappointed they had to compare 2133 MHz memory vs 3200 MHz memory to prove Intel is better by 1fps

Not only Intel is slower but also runs hotter, and retards will defend this.

>>59190409
Uhh where does it say the Intel is running at 3200Mhz?

>>59190427

>>59187500

File: panda xDDDDDDD.png (15KB, 600x438px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 600x438px

HAHaHa OH MY GOD YES!! I CAN KEEP PAYING INFLATED PRICES! I AM SO HAPPY!!
I also hope the next gen will have more built-in dmr and won't have more than 2% IPC increase, because making my parents pay for sidegrades makes me the happiest boy on earth!

I LOVE INTEL!

>>59185616
Generic picture with no clockspeed
135cpu winning in 2% from an brand new 95w X86 CPU....

>>59185616
nobody expected it to beat Intel at single threaded applications

>>59186247
Why not wait for a 1600x?

>>59186873
I personally don't buy AMD and haven't used AMD since early 2011. I want AMD to win so the kind kikes at intel cant ravage my ass with ridiculous pricetags. Instead, they'll gently fuck me with slightly inflated pricing

I thought new amd cpu would be cheaper than intel ones, what happened?

>>59190665
It is? Half the price of Intel 8-cores. Later we'll see 6 and 4 cores also for half of what intel's asking.

RYZEN
GAMING
4K

DO'T FORGET TO CALL US FIRST BBY

LUV U

>>59190691
then why all the fuss about them being DOA?

File: 1486004450001.jpg (76KB, 723x657px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 723x657px

>>59190776
Retard intel shills

>>59190776
Its just shitposters and paid shills.

>>59190776
Because people are comparing 8 core chips against Intel's 4 core chips in games that only use 4 cores properly. Intel has slightly better single threaded performance.

Note that the 4 core variants will perform pretty much the same. Intel will wind up costing twice as much for a few % increase in fps.

>>59190823
>>59190798
>>59190797
I see, im still using a shitty pc with a G30 so I'm looking to upgrade

File: 1456921033058.jpg (328KB, 810x587px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 810x587px

Holy shit these benchmarks posted are fucking amazing. Imagine what AMD's new CPU could do with fast quad channel memory. Suck me dry and call me dusty best timeline. Planning on updating all my rigs to Ryzen. I want an eight core for my media server for sure. Buy five of the 4 or low end 8 cores I think. Me 1800x or 1700x for sure. The Intel meme is dead.

>>59191012
fuck I meant G630

File: 1487902563089.jpg (94KB, 635x600px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 635x600px

>$500 and 5fps less than the competition
Is this a good or a bad thing? Lets see some Arma 3 benchmarks though, that game rapes your CPU.

Why dont games use more than 2-4 cores now? Its not 2006 anymore.

>>59185616
>Gaming Benchmarks
>Gaming

>>>/v/

>>59185684
No but apparently Vulcan does

>>59185715
>I think I understand shit

The human eye doesn't even see it frames per second dumb ass it perceives only changes in light.

>>59186148
Ryzen was targeted at gamers tho; go watch the announcement video.

>>59186330
No the point is that it's on par with i7's while drawing much less power. Most people don't even seem to realize that's the big thing about Ryzen. It's a beast of a x86 while being much more efficient than Intel's CPU's.

>>59191185
Perfectly normal for games that aren't tuned to use more than 4 cores effectively. I don't get why people are even comparing gaming when they are completely different cpu's. The 4c/8t and 6c/12t ones will have the same clock speed, meaning they will perform just as good in these 4-core optimized games. That's where the comparison to a $350 i7 will be interesting, seeing as those will both be cheaper.

>>59191185
fucking terrible considering kaby lake-x is out in a couple months

>>59191185
>>59191286
>tfw you'll never have to worry about making a good purchase or not because all you need is an APU and AMD has no proper competition

not to mention the fact that all APUs for the next few years will use the exact same socket
feels really good tbqh

>>59191185
This is good. AMD chips are clocked lower and are more power efficient. THey're also much cheaper than the Intel parts when they released or while released. It's also using slower memory and it's posting big gains across the board. Seems to point to AMD innovating and shifting the CPU market yet again. AMD brought us x64 and on die memory controllers. They're also leaps and bounds beyond Intel on IGP/APU's. Good times.

>>59190316
Just buy a fucking Chromecast, so you don't have reencode shit

>>59191286
>1700 dollar processor
>for games

>>59191383
KL-X is 4cores for 2066 aka Intel going full retard.

File: 1488247825853.png (556KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

556KB, 512x512px

>>59191361
>All those years of Intel jewery
>Soon to be undone
Best timeline.

File: adrian2.png (440KB, 776x760px) Image search: [Google]

440KB, 776x760px

>>59191361
why do people in here like monopolies and prices being inflated?

>>59191443
>>59191361
sorry lad, didn't mean to quote you.

>>59191443
Good question, I like to think they just like to troll and shitpost

File: 1460982535424.jpg (71KB, 600x448px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 600x448px

>>59191361
תכבה את זה

>>59186629
I honestly fully expect ryzen to be worst in games, but not by enough to matter.

>>59192000
If it's stock vs stock and not crippled by ddr then they're gonna trade blows.