Any functional programmers here?

>>59173904

Python : ^)

>>59173915
those python monads

>>59173904
OCaml.
I didn't (pure math BSc) but it's pretty much useless for computing. Seeing things like "covariant" or "contravariant" don't give any non-trivial information on the actual objects.
I'd definitely exclusively use functional programming if it didn't involve so much overhead when implemented on computing machines, for now it's mostly C, C++ and OCaml.

>>59174120
That second sentence got butchered when I rewrote it.
I actually spent a semester on category theory (hence the mention of my major) but like I said even when computer scientists use the terms in paper it's mostly borrowed terms for self-glorification purpose.

>>59174120
>>59174146
I'm definitely too tired to write properly but I think that somewhat makes sense.

I miss the functional programming generals, I wish someone would bring them back

Elixir, my dude