Phone Camera Rate Thread

File: IMG_20170227_203050.jpg (2MB, 3120x4160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3120x4160px

>>59168861
And another sample from the Z2 Pro.

File: 62c21fa0-c260-4337-95c7-2876fc80e0eb.png (2MB, 1200x1600px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1200x1600px

Looks nice anon.

File: 0228171224a_HDR.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

R8

File: 0217172246a-1.jpg (1MB, 1521x3006px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1521x3006px

Dont have any night photos

>>59169033
Which phone?

>>59168861
Where is that?

>no one but op posting low light shots
Just how shit are your cameras?

>>59168861
What do you want us to say? It looks like shit.
I have an Alcatel POP 4 that cost me $50AUD and it takes better night shots than that.
You Gearbest representatives need to fuck off or at least stay in your /csg/ containment thread.

They all look like shit

>>59172496
cash me outside

phone cameras can never have good low light performance because

tiny but high pixel density sensor
no tripod so forced to use iso boost to get that 1/30-1/60s shot

>zukshills

Meh. My sony cybershot can do better than this.

>>59172868
>>59172496
>>59172479
I don't see you posting.

>>59172620
>high density
Define high, because so far only Sony has stupid high 21MP cameras. Zuk z2 pro is 13MP and Galaxy s7 is only 12MP.

File: 2017-02-28 23.03.16.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

>>59168861
really low light. phone 1: xperia xz, superior auto, 8mp 4:3

File: 2017-02-28 23.03.34.jpg (1MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4032x3024px

>>59175613
phone 2: iphone 6s, auto, 12mp

File: 2017-02-28 23.05.49.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

>>59175636
phone 3: xperia z5, superior auto, 8mp

File: 0228172008c.jpg (3MB, 4656x3492px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4656x3492px

LG v20
>>59169033
>>59169048

Room is lit from the stairway light. You couldn't read easily its pretty much dark
Iso of 200 with a 1.3 second exposure

>>59175660
>>59175636
>>59175613
Is it just me or does the iPhone look slightly better?

How come the sony cameras have a lower MP count?

>>59175660
>>59175636
>>59175613
All of these are better than the Zuk Z2 by far.

>>59177548
They'd better, they cost 5x as much as the Zuk Z2.
Would be quite concerning if a $180 phone could match a $800 phone.

File: 2.8 (2).jpg (841KB, 2560x1536px) Image search: [Google]

841KB, 2560x1536px

Samsung Galaxy Core Prime
5MP Camera

It's terrible in low light, and most pictures are blurry. I can't wait to buy a proper mirrorless camera.

>>59177718
Just goes to show that zuk z2 is shit.

>>59177548
>comparing a $160 phone to $700 phones
Are you okay?

File: LG.jpg (2MB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2048x1152px

LG V10. Lowest light picture I have.

>>59168861
>>59168908
That's surprisingly decent for low light, especially considering it's a chinkphone and not a Samsung S7 or iPhone 7 plus.

File: yvfrLbJL.jpg (12KB, 240x240px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 240x240px

>>59177792
>>59177548
>>59172868
>>59172479
>getting this assblasted because your phones have inferior camera performance than OPs phone
Kek

File: IMG_0285.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

iPhone 7 plus

I don't have night photos just got this phone a few days ago but still posting for the fuck of it.

File: TREESNIGHT.jpg (1MB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1152px

>>59177825
oh and it's compressed. Original picture is 8.42MB. As is pic related. Same phone. Using Lightroom for Android

File: IMG_20161129_192533res.jpg (249KB, 1200x1600px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 1200x1600px

Xiaomi note 3 pro. Low-light is pretty terrible, I'm really impressed by OPs photo.

I can't wait to own a g5 plus it's going to BTFO so many phones

>>59178017
Does the redmi have manual camera controls?

>>59178017
RN3P has a pretty shitty cam in general.

I'll receive my Axon7 in 1-2h, which replaces the RN3P I threw into the bathtub last december.

It's said to have excellent daylight quality, rivaling apple and samsung flagships, but horrible low-light performance, although recent updates appear to have helped.

So I'm excited to see how it will perform

File: IMG_20161209_165557.jpg (2MB, 4000x2992px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4000x2992px

Have this really fucking awful shot taken by my Nexus5x

>>59168861
Ayy, Maquarie Park. I work near there.

>>59170509
Macquarie Park, NSW

> t. works around the corner from there

OP, we should meet up one day and touch dicks.

>>59179056
I'll touch your dick as well, don't worry.

>>59179110

Nice. It's been a while

>>59175529

The Sony one isn't really 21 megapixels.

File: IMG_20170301_012601.jpg (703KB, 1920x1440px) Image search: [Google]

703KB, 1920x1440px

Keyboard light only

Huawei Mate 9

Exposure 0.6
Aperture 2.2
Focal Length 4.0 mm
ISO Speed 1000
Flash No Flash

>>59179136
Then what's the real resolution?

>RN3P
>fucking awesome phone
>camera is absolute shit at anything more than 100iso and even then it's a shit

>>59178017
Looks like a painting lol

File: IMG_20170222_141029756.jpg (4MB, 3120x4160px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3120x4160px

I don't have any low light pictures to add, but here's my bunny.

Also, Moto droid, 21MP

File: DSC_0111[1].jpg (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3840x2160px

I will say it's pretty trashy.

Xperia Z1

File: IMG_20170301_213808.jpg (2MB, 3120x4160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3120x4160px

>>59168861
Another Zuk Z2 Pro here.

>>59168908
Nice shot op. Could pass as a wallpaper imo.

File: IMG_20170225_161513_HHT.jpg (1MB, 2160x3840px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2160x3840px

Xiaomi Redmi 7 Pro

Photo taken in 2021

>>59177506
ive limited the sonys mp to 8 cause the only other 4:3 option is 20+MP, which is retarded.

yeah, the iphones does look better, and it uses a sony sensor. gg sony, your camera software, as always, needs work.

>>59177881
Wow for such an expensive and heavily shilled phone (especially for its photo quality) this one looks mediocre at best... My old HTC one S did better than this in normal light.

>>59181505
if the sonys weren't so expensive to the point where it is cheaper for me to buy a iphone I'd get one.

File: IMG_20170129_011655.jpg (2MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3024x4032px

nexus 6p barcelona beach

File: IMG_20170126_202757.jpg (4MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4032x3024px

>>59182930
madrid

File: IMG_20161106_150145.jpg (4MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4032x3024px

>>59182960

File: IMG_20160903_015813.jpg (2MB, 2992x4000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2992x4000px

>>59182989

>>59182930
>>59182960
those are very good for a phone. but considering the price of the phone, they should be good.

>>59183028
well yeah, but all expensive phones are, that's the point of this thread.

nexus 6p has decent lowlight for a phone because of the larger sensor size.

>>59183109
*not all expensive phones

>>59183109
cameras, are to me, the most important component of any smartphone, not often we are able to find real camera shots from the phone, I think these threads are extremely useful, and when you start comparing camera samples, you start wondering why some phones have such shitty cameras. And how some really cheap phones are not that bad at all. But with the camera component not being more than $30 retail, why are so many phones still being made with such shitty cameras??

File: 2017-01-28 23.47.50.jpg (2MB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 5312x2988px

Quick snap I took the other day.

Samsung Note 4

File: 20160727_233549.jpg (3MB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5312x2988px

Note 4

>>59182621
good thing is that they drop in price pretty fast, unlike iphones. got my xz for $420 new, which was cheaper than my used 64gb 6s

>>59183212
The problem with these threads in the past has been that everyone just posts great looking daylight macro shots which even a $50 phone can make look nice. That's why I like this thread in particular, we can see how the cameras for different phones perform in more difficult conditions.

File: 1463884705589.jpg (3MB, 2976x3968px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2976x3968px

Huawei P9
Low light performance is pretty shit on it.
Tho this pic was taken in pitch black 5 in the morning. Only light sources are the ones you see in the distance.

File: 2015-10-16+07.43.59.jpg (3MB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5312x2988px

wew

>galaxy s6

>>59177792
>>59177548
>>59172868
>>59172479
What the fuck is going on here?

File: File 2-3-17, 09 14 23.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

iPhone 6s+
Corrected Rotation

File: Amazing Sunset - Running Trail (Original).jpg (778KB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

778KB, 2048x1152px

LG G4

Bow down, mongrels, it's still the best camera sensor and lens assembly to this day.

>>59188205
Lol, I give up, Apple sucks.
Get rid of EXIF rotation, rotate it via Preview, still somehow fucks it up.

>>59188213
That's actually pretty fucking good. All lot of cameras just turns the horizon into a blob when taking sunset pics.

>>59188237
Using HDR really helps.

>>59188205
Lmao rotation.
Still, that's a pretty nice image for a night shot.

File: File 2-3-17, 09 37 36.jpg (1MB, 4011x2554px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4011x2554px

>>59188356
Must be really aggressive HDR.
Heres one taken by my iPhone 6s+

I fucking swear if it fucks up rotation on this one...

You people need to learn how to hold a camera/smartphone/whatever and take more stable fucking pics, my god the blurriness most of you add because of not taking your meds to combat your jitters is atrocious.

>>59188515
Try to focus on the sun so HDR brightens the scene instead of dimming the sun.
Usually works better imo.

>>59188213
>Filename
Kek

File: 20160621_003702.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

taken with an S7
pretty grainy but good enough

File: 20161114_234105.jpg (1MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4032x3024px

Another S7 shot. The photo turned out way brighter than the actual scene so I was pretty impressed.

File: screenshot'd.jpg (338KB, 1440x1080px) Image search: [Google]

338KB, 1440x1080px

>>59188781
Nice

>Compare phone cameras
>Using pictures one a website with file limits

What's the point if you have to downsize or compress the picture to upload it here?

File: Screenshot_2017-03-02-10-04-02-2143983337.png (294KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

294KB, 1080x1920px

>>59188855
>compress or downsize
What?

>>59175723
That looks identical to my room, do you live in this complex?

>>59179299
This ain't 21 bitch it's 22.

>>59182930
>>59182960
>>59182989
Show us hot Spanish chicks

Does anyone find that Open Camera applies an excessive sharpening filter to the pictures? Can it even be modified?

>>59189044
honestly I see way more hot girls here in Orlando everyday than I saw in Spain, not even meming

>>59189051
Idk but I really love how clouds look when you apply DRO

>>59179104
>touch dicks

typical faggot behaviour from people on the wrong side of sydney.

File: 20160508_220838.jpg (3MB, 4752x1808px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4752x1808px

>Galaxy Note 5
It's okay. Looks better if I fiddle around in Pro mode, but I'm not that great at taking pictures.

File: 20170108_214957.jpg (1MB, 1836x3264px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1836x3264px

Random shot from Cuba I did this January
>LG V20

>>59179104
Why are all autistralians faggots?

We should just round up all of the world's faggots, send them to autistralia, and then nuke them all at once.

File: IMG_20170225_070841.jpg (886KB, 1560x2080px) Image search: [Google]

886KB, 1560x2080px

LG G3
The image in shrinked
HDR on

File: IMG_20170301_224001_DRO.jpg (849KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

849KB, 2560x1440px

>Moto E 2015
lel

File: IMG_20140531_223324.jpg (1MB, 3200x2368px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3200x2368px

nexus 5

>>59190920
You gotta clean the camera glass with circular movements to avoid those lines in the lights

File: IMG_20140809_214914.jpg (1MB, 3200x2368px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3200x2368px

>>59190930
Lutzern,Switzerland
Nexus 5

File: IMG_20150301_210427.jpg (2MB, 3200x2368px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3200x2368px

>>59190930
>>59191347
another one, these are actually very good for a 2013 smartphone that was considered to have a shit camera

File: APC_0015.jpg (2MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3024x4032px

Are camera apps a meme or do they actually help? Aside from the free ones like lightroom is spending $ on them worth?

>>59190956
Thanks for the tip

File: PICT_20161127_203930.jpg (3MB, 5472x3080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5472x3080px

1

File: PICT_20161113_222800.jpg (2MB, 5472x3080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 5472x3080px

>>59192573
2

File: PICT_20161127_202116.jpg (3MB, 5472x3080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5472x3080px

>>59192600
3

File: 1472922197619.jpg (32KB, 400x439px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 400x439px

>>59177516
keep right except to pass, dickhead

File: IMG_20170214_032742.jpg (2MB, 2280x1290px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2280x1290px

>>59192611
4 and last
Huawei P8

>>59177875
>shitposting this hard because you have down syndrome

lel

>>59192622
>women drivers
Kek

>>59191823

There's some that will allow you to adjust controls manually, but anything claiming to make photos clearer or higher res are memes. The only way to get better quality photos is to have a larger sensor. Megapixels are also a meme unless, again, the sensor is big enough.

Lol just goes to show that Zuk Z2 has shit camera

File: WP_20161207_15_58_58_Raw__highres.jpg (4MB, 5344x3008px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 5344x3008px

>Lumia 950
Low light is pretty noisy.

>>59191405
I always thought Nexus 5 had a pretty good camera. Only issue was the slow shutter speed.

>>59192666
There was an app on my Nexus 5 that made photos much higher res by taking multiple photos per shot.

It actually worked.

File: IMG_20170205_194944.jpg (3MB, 4160x3120px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4160x3120px

Is this low light?

>>59192717
I don't see any Zuk Z2s in this thread though, what are you talking about?

>>59193280
Doesn't matter, since it having a shit camera is already true.

>>59193072
Yeah

>>59193879
Better camera than the mi5 though, which is true regardless what you want to think or say

File: WP_20160711_12_00_29_Raw__highres.jpg (2MB, 3840x2161px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3840x2161px

>>59194179
>this chinkshit is better than that chinkshit
I don't think I've heard of any chinkshit phone having a decent camera other than Huawei's Leica models.

File: asf woods sar.jpg (3MB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5312x2988px

>>59168861
midnight in Alaska desu

Galaxy S6

>>59194179
>Better camera than the mi5 though, which is true regardless what you want to think or say
Ahahahahah

Even Pajeets have a better opinion than you
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3AaEnlK_Nw

File: WP_20170227_07_58_18_Pro.jpg (2MB, 3264x1840px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1840px

Lumia 650

File: 24a522e8-c811-43dd-a675-4e9be5753eb7..jpg (4MB, 5344x3006px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 5344x3006px

Moto x pure

>>59194606
How does it feel to know that you're wrong?

File: WhatsApp Image 2017-03-02 at 13.48.58.jpg (78KB, 1599x899px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 1599x899px

S7 Edge

File: image.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

iPhone 6

File: image.jpg (727KB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

727KB, 3264x2448px

>>59197867
And here's another iPhone 6 one. It does a shite job in all honesty.

Favourites from the thread:

>>59194462
I fucking love this, looks like a still from a film. 10/10.

>>59190930
Love the colours, especially the blue of the sky and the soft red light on the right. Very nice photo.

>>59190920
Very cool, like the lens flares and the texture of the sky. Makes it look like the city is being smothered.

File: image.jpg (2MB, 1687x3025px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1687x3025px

Also this thread was supposed to be for low-light photography you tards

>>59190920
What I meant by the sky, reminds me of this Strindberg painting

File: IMG_20170301_173850_HDR.jpg (3MB, 4608x3456px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4608x3456px

Xiaomeme redmi note 3 pro here