>corelets >threadlets

>>59149997
Still use a 4 core i7 from 6 years ago. Fite me.

>>59149997
Q6600 master race here

The only thing more retarded than your image is you.

File: shit wrecker.jpg (62KB, 800x400px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 800x400px

>>59149997
Intel apparently will be lowering the prices on their Broadwell-E chips. The i7 6900k might come down to $700, and that means the lower tiered 6850k and 6800k will be bordering on decent price/performance. Understandable if they want to make a 6 core Coffee Lake part for their mainstream platform.

We've been stagnating for far too long, and its not because multiple cores are too difficult to utilize. Plenty of software today is well threaded, and having more cores available also means you can simply run more programs at once without impacting performance of anything else running. 6c/12t and 8c/16t are a great step forward. AMD once again leading the market in establishing new paradigms.

>>59150027
>quad poors

File: 1484913175001.jpg (54KB, 920x730px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 920x730px

>tfw still using 2500k on muh Gentoo
everything compiles fast enough and there's no problems even when using VMs and stuff. I'm not going to pay 600-1000 just for a Ryzen upgrade

>>59149997
>mfw only regret with my new x1 is the fact that even though it has a high clock speed it's still just a 2c/4t CPUlet that will never ever give stable 60fps performance in modern games if I ever decide to dump my desktop and go eGPU through thunderbolt

1c1t should be in its own class because the only reason you'd use something like that now is to run ancient software (games).

>>59150101

350 for CPU
110 for motherboard
100 for DDR4 RAM
____
>560 = 1,000

A-at least I have muh cores

AMD should just fuck off already.

>>59149997

i have dual water cooled xeon e5-2670's, with 8c/16t each, for a total of 16c/32t.

64gb ram (16x4gb)
8gb vram Quadro M4000

>>59150098
They need to lower those prices even further to make up for the performance and TDP differences.

>>59150236

How dare they give Intel competition!

>>59150251
Except they don't, they're a fucking joke as always

>>59150077
>tfw I used to have one but my AMD gpu housefired
Take care of it anon

>>59150200
Yeah, if you want 1700 and the cheapest shitty motherboard and the cheapest slow memory. That'll still be 600 euros minimum in my country, as I said. 1700X will be almost 800 euros with a decent motherboard

>>59149997

I got a server rooms with multipler servers with dual xenon setups.

Fucking normie.

>>59150200
>350 for CPU
a 4c/8t is $199 :)
>110 for motherboard
a b350 mobo which allows for overclocking is going to be about $80 for a good one :) :)
>100 for DDR4 RAM
you can get 8gb for under $50, and 16gb for $80 :) :) :)

File: 102cee2d7faf13b5744942deda834ad9.png (224KB, 799x540px) Image search: [Google]

224KB, 799x540px

>>59150270
Buttmad corelet detected.

>>59150178
Make a version for 1996 with MHz values in .gif format then.

>hertzlets

>>59150304
Not him but you can get a high performance mb and ram for that price, wtf you on about?

>>59150432
>when you're powersupply runs at higher Hz than your CPU

File: Intel_C4004.jpg (12KB, 330x220px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 330x220px

>>59150483
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_4004

>740 kHz

>In mid-November of the same year, with the prophetic ad "Announcing a new era in integrated electronics", the 4004 was made commercially available to the general market.

>>59149997
And where does my hex core Phenom II fit into this chart?

>>59150716
Extremely out dated.

File: 1422069055157.jpg (67KB, 363x1082px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 363x1082px

>>59150716
Right about here.

>>59149997
I have an i3 and it just fucking werks™

The only thing that's obsolete with my 3-4 year old PC is it's RAM.

I'm going to upgrade to 8GB RAM to accomodate a VM.

>>59150147
>>59149997
King of Corelets mode with my undervolted 7500u.

Still pulls an easy 60fps on Bf1. Quad core needed still a myth?

>not using 6c12t

>>59150799
>Still pulls an easy 60fps on Bf1
you got some benchmarks to prove it? not even your own, just some good ULV cpus + thunderbolt gpu?

File: 1484581656265.png (45KB, 313x413px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 313x413px

>>59150789
>upgrade to 8GB
comedy gold

Where is 6 cores 6 threads on that chart?

>>59150845
My shit mini PC has 4 GB and that's only because I was too lazy to add more. Everything else is 8 GB and up.

File: s1.jpg (41KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 640x480px

>>59150750
That's funny, I don't feel outdated.

>six cores at 4.5ghz
>plenty of L3
>outdated

say that to my 1055t not online

>4c/4t 2500k master race
Still not overclocked and no issues.

>>59149997
>tfw King of Corelets
>tfw overclocked i3 6100
>tfw it will probably be tied with the i3 7350K for the most powerful dual cores ever made, last of their breed
>Cannon Lake or Ice Lake will probably have quad core i3s, Pentium line might even die off
>I will forever be the King of Corelets

>>59150845
>normal things sound funny to anime internet autists
ok I guess.

File: lain_fuck.png (156KB, 500x439px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 500x439px

>>59149997
mfw G4560
2c/4t

>>59149997
>tfw 6 core 12 thread is left out

>3c/9t

>>59150915
ramlets are always funny

>Tfw more vram than ram

troll or genuine shill, whats your take?

>>59150845
The only reason to have under 8GB of RAM is if it's a phone, embedded system, or similar.

RAM is used by your OS for caching all sorts of shit, even with a decent sized SSD, having more RAM available is pretty much ALWAYS going to be better.

>>59150959
>Constantly trying to call other people small to assert your masculinity
How does it feel being a dicklet, Napolean?

>>59150826
Will have to bench later ULV CPU gaming benchmarks are tough to find...

I know for me running my lenovo e570 with 7500u and 950m i can pull easy over 60fps although the weak Gpu needs 720p /medium to stay there.

>>59151015
What kind of thread do you think this is? You want a hug? 4 GB RAM was pathetic in 2010.

$70 8c/16t master race

>>59151039
>implying I'm the guy you're replying to
I have 8GB of DDR4 and I'm looking to upgrade when prices come down. That doesn't make you not a cuckold.

>>59149997

File: 1430460027689.png (450KB, 812x720px) Image search: [Google]

450KB, 812x720px

>>59151055
>2017
>8 GB
>On main PC

Weren't shills shilling the i7 over the i5 back then because they were claiming that gaems aren't going to run on 4 cores forever? The narrative seems to have changed now

>>59151073
Are you retarded? If you had been in almost any thread from the past ~3 years on /g/ about building a computer for gaming, MOST people were recommending i5's because the performance difference between an i5 and i7 is minimal and your GPU is more important, so the extra $100 instead of going to the i7, should go towards a better GPU, or better monitor.

TLDR; wew you must be new here, or trolling.

>>59151072
>Needing more for anything but rendering video which I don't do
Name one (1) game, browser or office program that benefits from more RAM than 8GB more than it benefits from faster RAM

>>59151107
GTA5 which uses your RAM for textures when your vRAM runs out.

>>59151072
>he fell for the 16gb meme

>>59149997
You know what, OP? You might be right now that AMD is competitive again

Then again, as of right now you're full of shit

>>59151115
>vram
>running out

>>59151107
>one (1)
What the fuck is the deal with this meme?
It's one of the stupidest things I've ever seen on here.

Here come the angry ramlets. You wouldn't be so angry if you'd bought 16 gigs. lmao

>>59151115
>Not being 8GB/8GB VRAM/RAM master race if you're a gamer

>>59151139
>Blown out by facts
>lol u mad xD
The last refuge of the brainlet

>>59151123
>>59151155
>moving goal posts

You asked for a game, you didn't say I had to have a TitanX or GTX 1070 or similar.

Play GTA5 with 2GB vRAM and have less than 4GB of system RAM and let me know how it goes, vs that SAME system with 16GB of decently fast RAM.

You'll get ~10-20 fps improvement and less frame dips.

>>59151072
>8GB is not fucking enough
Nigga,I'm not him but I run on 2GB RAM and I don't experience any problems. And I have Windows 7.

>>59151205
That better be 32-bit Windows 7 or it'll be a world of pain.

>>59151186
>Says other people are moving goalposts
>Move from 8GB of RAM to 4GB
>The 16GB has to be "decently fast" now
>Oh and only if you're also a GPUlet

So under no reasonable circumstances that don't involve massive mismatches between system RAM and your GPU (16GB of DDR4 2666 RAM is more expensive than most 4GB vRAM GPUs!)

>>59151205
Lol, i'm just browsing the internet right now.
11 tabs open in chrome.

Music playing in the background, rainmeter also running, and a cloud backup service running in the background.

Total RAM use 14.2GB

Since I have two monitors I could throw a game up on my main screen and easily use 20GB+

I have 32GB though so i'm not worried.

>>59151115
If you reach the point where a game is swapping assets from system memory to video memory, your performance has already gone completely to shit. It's the very reason why running out of VRAM is an issue at all.

>>59151220
64-bit.

>hint - it's a crazy as fuck LGA775 system that has a 2.5GHz E5200 and an Radeon R7 240 GPU. As crazy as it sounds,it works and I have Speccy proof of it,can post if needed.

>ramlets
>hertzlets
>giglets

>>59149997
>mfw i5-3320m
>2c//4t

someone put a lot of effort into this meme even though it actually isn't very funny

File: 1387145367929.jpg (318KB, 1102x967px) Image search: [Google]

318KB, 1102x967px

>>59149997
>tfw 2c/4t

why can't I just be rich and buy the best computer parts?

>>59151240
>Rainmeter
>Chrome being Chrome
I'm surprised it's only 14GB, and your music player probably isn't using more than 200MB

File: 1476824620480.jpg (199KB, 785x757px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 785x757px

>>59150338

>xenon

Go back to >>>/o/

>>59151244
Get a Q9xxx CPU or a 775 modded Xeon and extend your computer's life a year or two

>>59151287
>music player probably isn't using more than 200MB
it's currently using 7MB of RAM

>>59151287
>>59151308
My backup service is using almost 4.5GB itself, that's the largest single RAM hog at the moment.

File: p5gcmx.png (74KB, 773x576px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 773x576px

>>59151307
As weird as it sounds,this E5200 is more than enough. Keep in mind that I'm coming from a E2180,which is pure hell.

>>59149997
>not 6c/12t

>>59151259
It's an edit of an older one with height

>>59151358
I know, but that doesn't make it funny

>>59151328
Jesus fuck what

Just keep a RAID and do weekly

12core 24T is the sweet spot.

8 core is just too close to the edge.

6c/12t master race

>can clock higher than 8 core fags
>more threads than 4 corecucks

>>59151402
This.
5820K is still the best value Intel has ever offered.

>>59151415
That's not saying much.

>>59149997
>corelets
isn't AMD and intel working on smaller wafer cut "corelets" to increase yields before assembling the CPU?

>>59150799
I get 120fps in Dirt Rally with mine
It's all on the devs to make a low-power game

>>59149997
If i bought a laptop with 8GB of Ram but i3 processor, is the extra RAM useless?

>>59152088
No. That's a pretty good match.

>>59151749

A healty 185-189 cm male adult was a 165 teen boy once...

File: Intel-pentium-4-HT-logo-825x1024-1-.png (303KB, 825x1024px) Image search: [Google]

303KB, 825x1024px

>>59149997
1c/2t master race

>>59149997
I have a fx 8300 overclocked to 4.2 ghz on air. It can barely compete with an i3 and bottlenecks my rx 480.

>>59152242
Why do you think there's a Ryzen logo there and not an FX logo?

File: Screenshot_2017-02-26-21-38-11-1.png (3MB, 1440x1542px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1440x1542px

>>59149997
>dumb faggot who spent too much money on an instruction interpreter tries to insinuate that people cleverer than him didn't spend enough money on extremely diminished returns in terms of usefulness, the post

>>59150200
500 for 1800x
250 for fully overclockable motherboard
250 for 32GB DDR4 RAM
____
1,000

>>59152210
Bipeline housefireg :DDDDD

>>59149997
Move 4/8 down to king of corelets and insert 6/12 into its place

>>59152242
nice try, the fx is 4c/8t

File: hyberbipeline.png (973KB, 801x1500px) Image search: [Google]

973KB, 801x1500px

>>59152370
ebin :----DDDDDDD

File: Capture.png (42KB, 715x606px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 715x606px

>>59151336

That's not bad. I have more miserable stats (in some areas)

>>59152350
Why do you hate fun?

File: porcesler.jpg (44KB, 400x299px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 400x299px

>>59149997
4c8t masterrace

>>59152426
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_D

File: 1456030728903.jpg (67KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 600x800px

>>59152459
>Why do you hate fun?
I'll have fun when dumb fuck toilet-averse south Chinese monkey manlets stop ragging on 2c/4t, I have one that averages 10% during daily use. The 4c/8t waste of money i also own averages 8%

>>59152423
AMDfags BTFO

Want to upgrade but ram is so expensive

i have 32GB right now if i wanted 32GB of DDR4 that is like 250 here.

File: image.jpg (45KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 500x500px

>>59152732
>tfw 7Gib of ram

>>59151749
No those are chiplets

File: rzaba cios.jpg (172KB, 1354x889px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 1354x889px

>>59152732
>tfw 1 GiB DDR2 RAM

>>59150908
L3 is a meme

>>59152938

32GB in 2x16 with low latency, high speed, is like 370 in burger bucks

lol my ultrabook came standard with 8GB of RAM. main PC is 32GB but I only really use 10GB max at a time without VM.

>>59153127
>>59152938
ayy i got 2x16GB 2400MHz DDR4 for $90 when it was cheap.

>>59152723
>>59152732
-20 seconds in MS paint?

>>59153201
>2400MHz
Enjoy your slow memory, speedlet.

>>59149997
>tfw optimal amount of cores and threads

>>59153201
is the rising RAM prices meme still going on? can't they get their manufacturing up or wtf?

>>59153871
It's going to get a lot worse once Ryzen is released. So many people that were waiting for a non-Intel upgrade option are going to move over.

File: ramlets.png (294KB, 915x678px) Image search: [Google]

294KB, 915x678px

>>59152732
I made a less shitty version.

>>59153603
RAM speed is a non-issue

>>59152203
I mean I'm 186, so you're not wrong

>>59153871
Buy RAM now it you plan on upgrading this year.

>>59154386
Kek, I have 48gb of ram and you can't stop me.
Feels good when I can crack open a 24gb ramdisk and keep on going. Or throw up 10 or so VMs to run a test without having to replicate to a server.
Costed 76 bucks per 16gb set, and they are now $110. Should have got the full 96gb...

>>59154386
Thanks.

The ramlet one is acctually the /g/ original, I only made the screen one

>3 cores 3 threads
>so hipster the scale doesn't even include you
Come at me.

>>59154481
It's mostly poking fun at the current Ryzen/Intel divide where i5/i7's are suddenly on the shitlist after being on top of the pack for 5 years or so.

>>59154584
>shit list cause AMD is matching with them finally

no its just going to be a much more head to head thing now its a good thing for everyone means more fair pricing

>>59149997
I'm going to kill myself because I only have a 2 core CPU. Just imagine the suicide note...

what should someone do if they are still running 32 bit?

>>59154834
Hope you're running Windows XP, I guess.

>>59150101
Way to completely ruin this pic with an ugly frog

>>59150247
What are you doing with that?
>virtualization

>>59149997
6c/48t, where am i standing ?

>>59154834
Jack off to nude pics of your sisters. That's what I do anyway.

I've been sitting on a Core2Quad for a long time waiting for amd to unfuck itself. Hoping to do a Ryzen/Vega build this year. Don't let me down faggots.

File: 1442442150635.jpg (92KB, 374x363px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 374x363px

>tfw created a $5000 shitposting machine

File: cores.png (117KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1920x1080px

>>59149997

File: Untitled.jpg (256KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

256KB, 1024x768px

>>59154386

File: deadfish2.gif (2MB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 480x270px

>>59155989
>MFW this is not enough RAM.
>>59155957
>MFW this is not enough cores.

Why hasn't intel come out with a 48 core CPU at 4ghz yet.

File: cat.png (73KB, 1440x900px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 1440x900px

>>59156031
Not enough cores.

File: IMAG0572.jpg (1013KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

1013KB, 2048x1536px

Should have bought the 24 core.

File: IMAG0755.jpg (889KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

889KB, 2048x1536px

My GPUs can't handle these loads.

>>59156094

Show off.

File: 1484431158452.png (260KB, 620x640px) Image search: [Google]

260KB, 620x640px

>>59156141
Nah, my rig is outdated trash.

>MFW not even Quadro P6000 and dual Tesla P100s : "Eh? Whats this? 23 minutes to simulate fluids and gasses at 1080 for a 3 minute animation?"

File: AMD-Ryzen-7-1700-vs-Core-i7-7700K-DinoPC_GTA-V.png (2MB, 2560x1312px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2560x1312px

>>59149997
And then back in reality, Ryzen gets destroyed by a 4c/8t

>>59156320
It only took 150 replies before someone posted that stupid thing. Impressive.

>>59155903
Good job.

>>59150273
>GPU took out CPU
Do you mean the PSU blew while under load or something I don't get it.

>>59154584
>i5/i7's are suddenly on the shitlist
no you AMD kids are fucking delusional. the NDA is supposed to be lifted tomorrow so we'll see. i think an overclocked 7700k will be better in games than any ryzen.

>>59157033
>an overclocked 7700k will be better in poorly optimized, older games than any ryzen

Fixed.

>>59157312
nice meme. enjoy your input lag from the pipelined game engine architectures on your shitty console ports

>>59157362
The input lag train left the station a long time ago.

File: IMG_20161224_124054.jpg (2MB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 5312x2988px

>>59156094
>he doesn't even watercool his Xeons

>>59149997
>falling for the moar cores meme
Dual core or kill yourself.

>>59149997
saved.

corelets, when will they learn?

File: 1u-heatsink-copper-vs-alu.jpg (128KB, 1269x391px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 1269x391px

>>59159320
Eh? The TDP is so low though. I could cool these on fucking mini sinks.

>>59159385
>he doesn't even overclock his Xeons
>he bought Xeons that can't overclock
>he thinks overclocking Xeons is a meme

File: tumblr_m06bsiGNJc1qadqfco8_250.png (67KB, 228x228px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 228x228px

>>59159447
>he fell for the overclocking xeons meme

>>59159320
"Corsair" AIO cooler

I mean really, are you even trying?

>>59159464
Keep on believing that.
I got a nut hair shy of 1GHZ without even trying, and I can get up to 1.5, OVER the 3.33ghz, across all 12 cores.

File: 1416943890669.jpg (17KB, 251x251px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 251x251px

>>59155845
>Tfw POWER

>>59159488
It's cheap and just werks. Went from 99c and throttling to 65c. Coming from zalman copper space thrusters.

File: IMAG0577.jpg (1MB, 1536x2048px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1536x2048px

>>59159494
I'm not going to overclock when doing deep calculation where error free precision is critical.

>>59159516
but you can get air cooling that works like that can't you?

>>59159521
here...
>>59159516
>>59159320
Based on your motherboard and video card, clearly doing work is not your primary or secondary focus for your build.

So have fun with your outdated housefires.

>>59159521
And I have and do. Whatever makes you sleep at night I guess.

I've never had an issue, but these old Xeons are built like tanks and are QC'd to have tons of overhead, which lets you get away with overclocking. Can't say the same with post Sandy though.

>>59159544
Yeah, for less money, too.

File: 1415585434075.png (437KB, 1280x2286px) Image search: [Google]

437KB, 1280x2286px

>>59149997
>i5 4690k
it just werks

>>59150077
> he didn't have a Q9450

>>59151117
I know, 32gb or just buy a PS4

File: lmaoMKIII.png (475KB, 1919x1078px) Image search: [Google]

475KB, 1919x1078px

>>59149997
Poorfag corelets BTFO

File: 01.jpg (64KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 500x281px

>>59159705
Something doesn't seem quite right here.

where I'on the scale if I use 2 4core xeons from 2007¿

>>59149997
I am using an intel i5 2500k since 2011.
I still see no reason to upgrade.

>>59159721
Has has that annoying grid over his cpu usage chart for some reason. Probably thinks it's cool.

>>59159705
> only 16gb ram

>>59159705
>64C/128T
>16GiB

kek

>>59160066
>I'm poor
ftfy

>>59149997
90% (possibly 99%) of computers won't need 4 cores for years to come. The overwhelming majority of PC is used for office work and web browsing.

>>59160302
Yeah why would anyone want a car when horse is enough?

>tfw 4790k

Should I just end it?

>>59160966
So you're saying:
>2 cores = horse
>4 cores = car

This is basically the most retarded analogy you could have made in this regard because we're talking
two different performance levels of the same technology here, while you're trying to make it look like
as if 2 cores and 4 cores were fundamentally different in their construction and use.


More like
>2 cores = 50HP car
>4 cores = 100HP car

See where this is going? 100HP might me justified and it's nice to have but that's it. You get
around fine with 50HP.

>>59160966
>this level of stupidity

Twice as many cores or possibly even more won't give you ANY advantage in performance with software like MS Office or Chrome, Firefox, whatever browser you're using. If you buy a PC today you're gonna get a quad core CPU if it's a desktop but if you still own, let's say, a 4 year old i3 dual core it would be retarded to upgrade. Hell, for pure desktop use and browsing the web you'd get along fine with a 3GHz P4 if it weren't for the limitations in amount and speed of RAM.

>>59151172
umad breh?

>>59161094
Yes it will you dumb asperger.

>>59161125
Your level of argumentation is unmatched.

>>59161125
>yes it will
>no it won't
>yes it will

Wow. Be more butthurt babby.

>>59161125
>>59160966
>>59160287
>be me, nice and sunny tuesday morning
>second day of well earned vacation
>am loner so decide to browse /g/
>come across CPU discussion thread
>see these massive tards

I think I'm just gonna cancel my vacation and go back to work. There's just too much stupidity on this board and I need to get my mind off this or I might explode. Shouldn't there be some test of intelligence before you let people post on a technology focused board?

>>59161050
>>59161094
If that's what you guys think I'm just gonna let you use your 640k mem because i heard it's enough for everyone for all time forever.
Stop being so naive

>>59161161
it doesn't matter how you feel about it, pre-orders for ryzen are selling like hot cakes.
if you want to settle for less then go ahead, but others can see that AMD has finally matched and surpassed intel in single threaded performance and are now deciding to jump from that stagnate. stale ship that is intel.

next up is nvidia with vegas official announcement later today. fanboys on fucking suicide watch.

>>59149997
Quadshits and below should genuinely consider suicide.

>>59149997
>tfw 5'8" with a 4c/4t 3570k that only reaches 4ghz

I'm gonna make it, r-right?

>>59150799
Doubt.
Even my 3570k struggles with that game.

>>59161229
Who said it's gonna be enough forever? It's just a fact that system requirements for web browsing haven't changed in the least over the last 5 years. Same goes with requirements of
text processing and spreadsheet work. There is no reason to upgrade a 5 year old system if that's all you're doing.

>>59161238
Did I say anything about Ryzen? A lot of enthusiasts will have a lot of fun with this new platform. All I, and several others in this thread were saying is that it is not necessary for 99%
of PC users because 99% of PC users don't even utilize the full performance of their dual core CPUs and probably won't ever in their life time.

>>59161258
You said and web browsing has become immensely more resource hungry. Get your facts straight before you use them

>>59152552
Not everyone is a dumb loser who does nothing but browse funnyjunk all day long.

>>59161258
>dual core
Who needs dual core, single core is too much, 1/2 core should be enough.

>>59161262
You're just plain wrong. The rise of HTML5 has even lowered requirements for a lot of websites. YouTube used to be far more resource intensive back when it used Flash. Hell,
even recent versions of Flash are more efficient than that shit used to be in 2012 or earlier because they reduced GPU usage. Everything web related has become more efficient
in the last few years. Anything that could play a 1080p YouTube video 5 years ago can play today's 4k YouTube videos without problems.

>>59156320
>A ryzen chip clocked significantly lower than a Kaby Meme chip in a game which does not use all 8c/16t performed less than said Kaby Meme chip
>LEL AYYMD FINISHED
God, people like you need to be gassed, especially given that you can boost the 1700 to probably at least 4.5 on stock cooling.

File: b62102ce14f34ca1a2194b62ce6ef93b.jpg (115KB, 641x856px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 641x856px

>>59149997
This is what amdrones believe.

Using dual core thinkpad. Feelsgudman.jpg

Looking at the beyond retarded discussion here I just conducted a little web browsing performance test. Keep in mind: This is not representative or scientific in any way. I just wanted to know how many 1080p YouTube videos playing simultaneously my two computers can handle. The test systems are:

>i5 4690k desktop (quad core)
>i5 3320m laptop (dual core)
Both with 8GB 1600MHz RAM and SSD installed, both with Windows 10 and Vivaldi and nothing else open besides Task Manager to measure CPU load. I tried to keep
the setups as similar as I could. Both were also set to maximum performance in Windows power management.


The 4690k desktop reached 100% CPU load with 25 1080p videos playing at the same time. Anything more produced noticeable lag in the videos and Vivaldi finally crashed when I opened the 39th video.

The 3320m reached 100% and showed its first signs of lag with 19 videos playing and Vivaldi crashed at the 31st video.


I know this is by no means extensive testing but I was surprised at how much the 3320m could actually handle. If that laptop was my only computer I'd say I wouldn't need to upgrade for the sake
of opening more tabs.

>>59149997
>AMD headquarters
>"Sir, our CPUs are being fucked by Intel! What do we do?"
>"More cores!!!"
>"But Sir... the tem..."
>"MORE FUCKING CORES!!!"
>"A.. a.. and the... the effi..."
>"FOR THE LAST FUCKING TIME I WANT TWICE AS MANY CORES OR I'M GONNA FIRE YOUR ASS!!!"
>"Y... yes Sir..."

>>59161448
This man is the top rated comedian in all of India.

>>59154386
>Ryzen is more efficient than inlet while having more cores
>Intel shills still get paid to post the more cores meme

>>59154386
Kek

when is the NDA lifted? i want to see 1700 vs 7700k @ 5 GHz in games

>>59161624
tomorrow as far as i know

>>59161624
March 2

>>59149997

2c/4t i5-3570k here

How can Ryzen fags even compete?

>>59152455
>3GB single channel
How?

>>59161667
4c m8

http://ark.intel.com/products/65520/Intel-Core-i5-3570K-Processor-6M-Cache-up-to-3_80-GHz

>>59161820
Maybe one 1GB and one 2GB module

>>59161867
I once did that and it said "Flex Channel Interleaved",but maybe because it was a Gigabyte motherboard?

>>59161902
I had to google what that even means. Appearantly Flex Mode is a technology which allows different sized RAM modules to run in Dual Channel. Not all mainboards support it though, I didn't even know it existed. I just assumed that RAM modules had to be the same size to support Dual Channel.

>>59150716
Slower than even a quad core Ryzen CPU

>>59161248
Get Ryzen and buy some big boots.

>>59152286
because there is no ryzen chip with 8 cores 8 threads

>>59162007
Interesting. So, the top Ryzen model will be 2x faster than my 1100T? If it will have ECC support I'm sold.

>>59151107
Browser of choice, with /guts/ and several other threads with images expanded.

>>59151107
>8 gigs is enough
No it's not. In the last year there have been 3 new games that have triggered the "not enough memory" error. I have to close my browser and other background shit to play them. 8gigs is only enough if you're an autists that has nothing else open in the background.

>>59151107
Pretty much this. There is currently no game that will use up 100% RAM in an 8GB system. You got to close background applications of course but you should do that when playing games anyway.

>>59162474
>So, the top Ryzen model will be 2x faster than my 1100T?
More like 3.5x faster.

>>59162792
Who the fuck keeps any applications open while gaming? That's ridiculous. Before starting a game you close all browser windows, all explorer windows, basically anything that could use up RAM. That's commmon sense.

>>59150799
I have an i3-550 3.2ghz. I cleaninstalled windows and unreal tournament 4 runs at 60 fps unless it's a big map like chill

>so many unsure faggots wanting validation
If you so sure you made the right choice why do you seek validation you hypocritical fags?
It's obvious you don't believe it yourself.
go seek validation by actually not being a stupid shit at technology.

File: corelets.png (307KB, 915x678px) Image search: [Google]

307KB, 915x678px

>>59162469
Whoops.

File: 1484353081022.png (402KB, 588x598px) Image search: [Google]

402KB, 588x598px

>>59162836
Yeah, I used to do that. In 1996.

>>59161248
lol 5'7" and a 3550

meet and fuck?

Well I bought my 4 core like 4 years ago
bulldozers don't even have proper cores

>>59150353
>you can get 8gb for under $50, and 16gb for $80

no, not unless you do mail in rebates or some shit, prices aren't that low

>>59149997
you don't need CPU with more than 15W TDP

there are plenty of things outside of games where 8+ RAM is desirable

If you're a gamer then sure, 8GB is fine for 99% of situations, but some of us need to run VM's and emulators and do video editing/processing etc

Friendly reminder to check RAM speeds when buying RAM and to check motherboard documentation to determine the right speed to buy and also determine which slots to install the RAM or else dual-channel wont work properly :)
I bet at least one of you retards is screwing yourself out of RAM

>>59162836

Wait, 32GB of RAM isn't the norm? Holy shit Im surrounded by casuals.

Realistically though, with how powerful processors are because of muh threads, background applications aren't really wasting CPU resources and RAM becomes the limiting factor.

>>59163565
All my RAM is supar fast and dual channels ok buddy? (Not really, one of my boxes has totally FUBAR mobo with only one working RAM slot. At least it was cheap.)

File: 8gb_cheap_af.png (92KB, 1594x578px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 1594x578px

>>59163480

Future complicated video codecs such as Daala(features overlapped DCT + MC, etc.) might demand 10+ cores for 4k video playback.

>>59163501
Put down the crackpipe.

>>59159705
sir, you have more core then active processes
stop it please

>>59163982
but those processes have more than one thread

>corelets this delusional

I'm the one guy on earth who bought a FX-4300.
I regret nothing.

>>59151137
its a standard way to write numbers on checks and the like to avoid any suspicion or illegibility of written numerals

>>59149997
I have 2c4t (i3-4160). I compile my C++ codebase a lot and sometimes have multiple virtual machines at a time. I have zero problems with any of these things, and zero problems running video games including ones which are famously CPU heavy.

I would get an i7 if I decided to go into serious video editing or 3DCG. Otherwise there doesn't seem to be a need.

>>59159628
>he didn't have a qx9650