Who the hell pays for 30 TB cloud storage?

>>59144709
I bet you don't even get enough transfer allowance to use that.

People with 30TB they want to back up off-site.

>>59144709
These aren't even deals just the same price per TB lol

I do.

It's handy for storing JAV.

>>59144851
Wrong. It's very slightly more expensive.

just get an offsite nas lol

I bet some websites with a decent amount of images and videos to maintain for some time (something like another imageboard might store stuff directly in cloud storage and pull it to the user. It makes sense if you need to hold a very solid amount of stuff and don't have a place for hardware.

>>59144922
>>59144851
Top fucking kek you're right. What the fuck was Google thinking?

>>59144709
Maybe some companies who need to make a lot of data accessible online for collaboration, but don't want to make their own solution? 30TB for 240 pounds is cheaper than paying one person to maintain a server.

>>59145655
Can you direct link when you have a google drive subscription? I don't think it's meant to be used as a cdn.