Wattman for Ryzen CPUs

>max 6375MHz

Whoa
Probably a single core on LN2

>>59144242
That's not per core voltage, read the label on each voltage slider. A few retards are going to miss that and fry their chips though, kek.

>>59144300
Mhmm, good point, still it seems trivial to set up a profile with disabled cores and higher OCd cores for older games if you need ST that much

>>59144313
Yeah that's nifty. On the other hand, it's going to be Windows 10 only, so AHAHAHA GOOD LUCK getting those older games to run anyways

The good news is "CPU drivers" are pretty much limited to nifty features like this and adaptive sleep and whatnot. A Ryzen chip will boot Windows 7 just fine. All you need is to hope Gigabyte pulls through and releases ethernet and USB chipset drivers for Windows 7

>>59144398
I don't really care about windows versions, my main machine is Linux and Windows machine is just for games, it doesn't even have a internet connection, the Windows one.
I don't care about multiplayer crap.

>>59144398
true. running 10 because it was on used pc

half the games from 8.1 laptop don't work even after fresh install. bullshiggy

File: 1471983905986.jpg (344KB, 1459x622px) Image search: [Google]

344KB, 1459x622px

>>59144242
>2017
>fixed vcore
So AMD don't give a shit about energy efficiency and performance under limited cooling, right?

>>59144398
is it 10 only? looking at asrock it seems like they package this on the 7 64bit

>>59144313
why would you need to OC for older games?
everything pre 2013 runs 144 fps on haswell already if you have GPU to back it up.

Can the windows scheduler even deal with that? Prioritizing the most critical thread to the fastest core?

>>59144595
I can't say no to more performance, some games suck at using more than 2 cores, more clockspeed will help there.
There's also badly coded shit, modded shit and just generally very intensive older games that won't run 144FPS even with a TitanXP, also minimum framerate average going up is nice too.

It's just pressing a hotkey or assigning a profile to a game, literally no sweat.

>>59144663 Nope.

>>59144663
...? Of course it can, you think the CPU just sits there wagging its tail at the OS?

File: amdfag.jpg (3MB, 8624x3896px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 8624x3896px

>>59144242
>RYZEN MASTER

But can w7 do basic idle underclock on ryzen? That's far more important than OC for those older games that don't run in w10 even through wined3d for windows

File: intel-skull-canyon-nuc-2016-03-17-03.jpg (120KB, 1400x878px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 1400x878px

>>59144705
Both companies do cringy gamer shit, get a grip.
Nvidia is no better.

>>59144242
>adjustable SoC voltage

Holy shit are we gonna get tools with overclock for other stuff on different clock domains? caches, buses, prefetchers? Not everything runs at the same clock.
This would be real fun to find out how the CPU works, high chance of blowing up everything though.

>>59144785
I think that's the southbridge voltage, which should only be increased if you're already running your cores overclocked to hell with fully used SATA/USB/PCIe ports, with multiple of them running at the same time, the chip might not handle all that I/O.

This is extremely rare to happen though, AMD most likely put it slightly higher to compensate already.

>>59144549
where?

>>59144242
Nothing there shows you can do per-core voltage, you blind moron.

In fact it shows the opposite. One voltage for them all.

It would have been a massive game changer if you could do per core voltage changes manually, but that's not what's going on here.

File: 1458785143814.jpg (80KB, 640x539px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 640x539px

>use all 8 cores for work
>use only 2 cores OC to 5ghz for gaming

how will intel EVER recover?

IT

IS

OVER


AMD WON

>>59146571
>>use only 2 cores

>I only play LoL and Skyrim

>>59146607
Even the most "multithreaded" games use only 1 core for the bulk of their work

They just offload some small things to other cores but it's basically nothing

>>59146627
Right, that's why some games don't even start on 2 cores and an 8 core 6900k beats a 7700k clocked 1GHz higher in games.

File: 1484686763369.gif (36KB, 265x200px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 265x200px

>>59146627
That's objectively false.
For Honor, Ghost Recon Wildlands, and many other newer games have usage between cores within 10% of one another.

It's the standard now days for games to use an n-number of cores. Most of these newer game engines will spawn dozens of threads at a time.

How can you possibly be so uninformed?

>1-8
>not 0-7

RYZEN DOA

>>59146834 Core zero is dedicated for TrustZone. Enjoy your backdoors.

>>59147010
So you're saying that Ryzen is essentially a 9-core CPU?

>>59144549
They developed SenseMi which adjust the Mhz by .50hz

>>59147028 It have 8 high-perfomance cores accessible for user. But it also have at least one smaller one for managment purposes.

>>59147028
All modern Intel and AMD chips have an integrated botnet processor that runs even when your computer is off. The only smart option is to buy a Piledriver and never upgrade again.

File: 9.jpg (218KB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

218KB, 720x540px

>>59144242
The CPU itself will set the voltages for each core. You set the frequency, and the chip does the rest of the work for you. It runs constant self checks to see if a given frequency will be stable before it switches, this is how it employs XFR in real time. It dynamically adjusts voltage on the fly as it switches frequency. It could never target an unstable frequency or it'd cause a system hang.
The vcore set is the highest value the CPU will request, not what it runs at fixed.

>>59147182
The PSP does not run when a system is shut off. Its an ARM TrustZone coprocessor.
The most that you could claim is that it isn't transparent, and that rustles your freetard NEET jimmies. To this date the system hasn't been compromised. Even freetards openly admit they have no real gripes with the security measures, they only warn against the presumptive hazards of a closed coprocessor having low level access to the CPU and memory.

>>59147182
So, is my 1100T still kosher?
Now that the scumbags removed ECC, which is desirable for large RAM sizes, I see no reason to not buy Intel.
That *if* I upgrade. I have 16GB of RAM and it is still plenty.

>>59146627
LET. THIS. MEME. DIE. CS:GO, which is built on the fucking ten year old Source engine, scales up to eight cores with 5-10% improvement for every core you add.

>>59147241 LDO? Why?

>>59147311
That's some pretty shit scaling, as expected of a decade old engine.

>>59147241
>The PSP does not run when a system is shut off

The Libreboot FAQ disagrees with you.

>>59147253
Thuban is the thinking man's Piledriver.

>>59147327
I agree, but the point is the difference between 2 and 8 cores in even old engines can be 40% plus. Obviously higher in modern engines!

>>59144242
>since everything got dumbed down after FSB was there.
FSB is still there, people just don't use it because it's scary. It is known as BCLK nowadays.

>>59147362
>BCLK
you meant QPI

>>59147362
people don't use it because it is tied with pcie bus which mean you cant overclock it at all.

>>59147404
>cant overclock it at all
technically you can, but things go south after just 3-4%

>>59147404
>cant overclock it at all
My 2% BCLK overclock disagrees.

>>59144242
>Playing CS:GO
>Set profile to enable eight cores but disable SMT
>Higher than normal clock

>Playing GTA
>Enable all the everything, smaller overclock

>Playing older single core games
>Disable six cores, speed target of 5.2GHz

>All of this happens automagically after you set up Ryzen Master profiles for each game

If the above is correct and RM works like WattMann, Ryzen might make me bite the bullet and downgrade to Windows 10

>>59147404
Not on Skylake and newer processors. Someone forgot to tell Intel's marketing team and it lead to the "locked Skylake overclock" fiasco. I'm still happily chooching my i3 6100 at 4.6GHz 1.35v

>>59147492
>downgrade to Windows 10
why? Ryzen will work on older OSes. It just won't be supported, so if something doesn't work at it should you're on your own.

File: turbo_button.jpg (76KB, 800x604px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 800x604px

Time to find a case with a turbo button.

>>59147521
>press turbo
>go slower

rly makes u thx

>>59147511
Ryzen will boot Windows ME or any arbitrary x86 OS, yeah. Thanks x86 backwards compatibility. But will Ryzen Master be available on 7?

>>59147253
>no ECC
Sauce me. We know shit.

>>59147538
well, WattMan works flawlessly on 7. If AMD has any common sense they will release Ryzen Master for Windows 7 as well.

>>59147500
For reference:
http://www.overclock.net/t/1570313/skylake-overclocking-guide-with-statistics

You can tweak memory and cache settings without really breaking SATA/USB/PCI-E functionality.

>>59147541
Hes referring to some questionable nonsense on reddit.

>>59147549
WattMan was a cooler name, though.

>>59147566
The Reddit nonsense was enough to stop me from buying until I get confirmation.