Who here is using ZOrin OS 12? I have to say, it's way more stable than and nicer looking than the previous version.
>nicer looking
I cant even begin to think what the previous version looked like if that trainwreck you posted is an "improvement"
>>59143554
Show me your desktop.
>>59143567
Why?
more like "Snorin" OS
>>59143554
This.
It's like it took the worst elements of W10 and amplified them to unbearable levels.
Looks aside. I think that everything seems to work a lot better now. Works fine freshly installed. Has more than enough features to suit most needs. I was debating between this and manjaro. I lack the patience to build my installation from the ground up to go with arch or gentoo. And I had bad experiences with both Ubuntu and mint. I feel like this has been a more pleasant Linux experience for me. I got tired of windows 10 and it's forced updates, and lack of freedom.
>>59143538
I'm waiting for the Lite version. It's really good but I think Zorin9 was much better especially the way it looked. 12 also had tons of bugs on release where the system would randomly freeze windows for no reason. They've also removed some features and their "new window" option was broken the last time I used it, it didn't work on most software and when it did it had the same result as the first option to open the app.
They are also now based on cinnamon instead of GNOME.
Also for some reason they're forcing you to restart your PC after updates, truly a genuine windows experience.
>>59144046
Zorin is basically Ubuntu for Windows users, whereas Ubuntu itself has a Mac-like layout.
>>59144046
Manjaro is pretty comfy. I've used arch for years and after hoping around a little I installed Manjaro and I'm pretty happy with it.
>>59144605
why manjaro not arch