Best Browser?

>>59132459
Just use Chrome or Opera. Firefox is shit these days. Chrome is botnet but overall the best browsing experience imo.

>>59132902
Yea that's what I was thinking: Firefox has gone to shit, but wasn't quite sure about how much botnet Chrome really is lol

>>59132459

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Browser_wars?wprov=sfla1

Put this into perspective before deciding.

Is TOR good for everyday use? I care about my privacy quite a lot, but I'm not sure if it's worth the hassle, since the browsing speed is noticably lower

>>59134308
I think for everyday use definitely not.

test test test test test

>>59134352
any recommendations for PRIVATE internet browser then? needs to be Linux-compatible

Test Test Test Test
ABC ABC ABC ABC
abc abc abc abc
test test test test

File: Capture.png (226KB, 1241x921px) Image search: [Google]

226KB, 1241x921px

>>59132459
>>59132902
>opera, lmao

Firefox is probably the best if you actually use plugins. If not, the botnet is the answer.

>>59134436
Just use firefox or some fork like pale moon. For privacy set cookies to expire when you close your browser, block all third party cookies and install the noscript plugin to block all the javascript bullshit in your browser by default. It does take some time to make exceptions for all trusted sites to execute javascript but in the end you get both privacy and better performance because all the ad-tracking scripts aren't executed all the time. If you want to you can get rid of your antivirus as well because no website will be able to store anything on your computer without your permission anymore. TOR is not impossible for everyday use but it's slow as fuck and many sites block tor exit nodes.

>>59132459
Vivaldi.
It's the new browser from Ex-Opera employees.(back when opera was good, up to 12)

>>59136403
Alright, I'll look into this one a bit :D
Thanks for your suggestion

>>59136826
It's still under heavy development though.
Several features are missing compared to Opera 12.
But they're working on it! =)

It's based on Chrome so all add-ons are working.
I'm not sure about google tracking status though, if you're worried about that sort of thing.

>>59135141
Can I please have your firefox css

>>59132902
Which one of the is lighter?
Dev'ing on low spec pc with browser constantly open in various sites can heavyweight a bunch CPU .

>>59137153
That's what I found out myself as well :D
Since my alternative is currently Chrome, which is full of google tracking, this probably has at least a little less of this haha

>>59137998
Yea probably, hehe. :)

>>59132902
>Firefox is shit these days
>but just use Opera

Do you even think before speaking?

>>59132459
Use Iron SrWare. It's Chrome but without the botnet. Definitely faster and best user experience.

>>59132459
>suggestion
if you are a patient person, use IE

>>59140034
>>Iron SrWare

>Chrome thrilled with an extremely fast site rendering, a sleek design and innovative features. But it also gets critic from data protection specialists , for reasons such as creating a unique user ID or the submission of entries to Google to generate suggestions. SRWare Iron is a real alternative. The browser is based on the Chromium-source and offers the same features as Chrome - but without the critical points that the privacy concern.


I'm not sure if I trust a project with that much engrish.

Opera 12.18

Opera with the built in VPN

>real /g/s
>using anything but firefox
lad

File: 1334688552524.png (12KB, 446x412px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 446x412px

>>59137998
>>59139485

>>59137992
Definitely not Chrome. It uses a shit ton of resources.

>>59139492
Yes. Opera over Firefox all day. Just my opinion.

>>59132969
It's about as much botnet as it can get.