Is port forwarding a meme?

jesus fuck go away you illiterate dumbshit

>>59116059
Yes. It's 2017. You should be using IPv6.

>>59116059
Your very existence is a meme, now please go back to >>>/v/ and don't come back.

>>59116096
Explain.

>>59116121
IPv6 gives every devices its own public address, eliminating the need for port forwarding. This is how the Internet was originally envisioned.
You should still use a firewall, of course.

>>59116142
oh
my
god

>>59116152
>oh my god
I'm humbled.

network ignorants, the thread

>>59116214
What specifically is wrong with >>59116142 ?

A meme (/ˈmiːm/ MEEM) is "an idea, behavior, or style that spreads from person to person within a culture".

I guess.

>>59116087
>>59116110
>>59116214
You guys need to get laid, you sound miserable

>>59116059
>he doesnt know how nat works
you have to be at least 18 years of age to post here.

>>59116464
I have a girlfriend whom I live with.

>>59116059
No you fucking mongoloid
When a service sends a packet to an address port forwarding just tells where that packet needs to be sent
>>>/v/

>>59116096
Tell that to ISPs and game devs who are unable to figure out how to provide IPv6 support.

>>59116142
So do ISPs that use dynamic IPs have to use static ones with IPv6? If not then it would still be pointless.

>>59116670
Doesn't mean you get laid, you cuck.

>>59116718
Non-issue. Use DNS.

>>59116812
You're right, I prefer to fuck standing up.

>>59116968
The fuck is the point of having an open NAT on COD then?

>>59117234
What the hell is "COD"?

>>59116229
He doesn't know how firewalls work.

>>59116464
You sound mentally retarded. Kill yourself, you dumb fucking shit stain.

>>59116970
e d g y

this is why we have the stereotype of network people being complete assholes

you make me look bad, stop it

>>59118018
A type of fish.

>>59118771
Nice reddit fomatting there, faggot.

I just came into this thread to learn, what's all the salt?

>>59116812
As a married man, I can attest to this. The proverbial well, has gone dry. ;^{

>>59116718
Your IPv6 address is 64 bits from the ISP plus 64 bits from your device. The 64 bits from your device is upper 24 bits of your mac + 0xfffe + the lower 24 bits of your mac address.

This allows routing to work like it always has and gives every device a globally unique IP address.

>>59117234
>>59118775
Does it refer to the game Call of Duty?
What is the connection here? (pun intended)

Why forward ports when you can just fuck around the corner of the house and the tears are quite delicious and I will be in touch with you and they'll likely leave you alone unless you're on a watchlist or a new one for the foreseeable future and the tears are quite delicious and I will be in touch with you and they'll likely leave you alone unless you're on a watchlist or a new one for the foreseeable future and the tears are quite delicious and I will be in touch with you and they'll likely leave you alone unless you're on a watchlist or a new one for the foreseeable future and the tears are quite delicious and I will be in touch with you and they'll likely leave you alone unless you're on a watchlist or a new one for the foreseeable future and the tears are quite delicious and I will be in touch with you.

I will be in touch with you.

File: Russian Soldier (2).jpg (51KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 250x250px

>>59118782
takes one

to know one

>>59119126
>baby's first markov chain

>>59117234
NAT? NAT is used because of the shortage of IPv4 adresses. What are you on about?

Also, what does a fish have to do with any of this?

File: Happy-face-smiley-face-emotions-clip-art-smiley-face-clip-art-thumbs-up.jpg (28KB, 512x430px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 512x430px

>>59116696
> Live in Belgium
> 48% IPv6 adoption
mfw

>>59116142
Is right.
>>59118732
> implying you need port forwarding for a firewall
You don't know how firewalls work.

>>59119220
>markov chain
>not using the keyboard suggestions to make the best shitposts

Why don't you go through my head and say hi to me burn and watch your mouth closed for all eternity in Iraq

>>59120861
nat doubles as a security feature

>>59120956
>literally mobileposting
that's shitposting alright

>>59120956
El problema es que no se si es necesario hacerlo el medio ambiente es cosa de todos los mensajes de la empresa que no se si es necesario hacerlo el medio ambiente es cosa de todos

>network illiteracy: the thread

>>59120988
NAT is still possible with IPv6 though.

>>59120861
>NAT is used because of the shortage of IPv4 adresses
Wew lad

>>59121096
Are you actually implying he's wrong?

>>59121084
right, and even though one of the objectives of ipv6 is to not need to nat, it will still be a good thing to do it, and just 1:1

>>59121096
>>59120988
RFC 4864

Although there are many perceived benefits to Network Address Translation (NAT), its primary benefit of “amplifying” available address space is not needed in IPv6. In addition to NAT’s many serious disadvantages, there is a perception that other benefits exist, such as a variety of management and security attributes that could be useful for an Internet Protocol site. IPv6 was designed with the intention of making NAT unnecessary, and this document shows how Local Network Protection (LNP) using IPv6 can provide the same or more benefits without the need for address translation.

>>59121096
You're a bloody idiot

>>59121107
He's correct that NAT is beneficial for that reason, but it absolutely wasnt the reason it was developed and implemented.

Do you have any idea the unbelievable headache network management becomes if you're not administrating everything inside of private ranges?
NATs benefit in terms of allocating IPv4 address and security are entirely secondary benefits, it is first and foremost for management.

>>59121131
You're a fucking faggot.

>>59121135
> its primary benefit of “amplifying” available address space is not needed in IPv6
> there is a perception that other benefits exist, such as a variety of management and security attributes

You're right that it's a benefit, but administration definitely wasn't is goal. The shortage of IPv4 adresses was.

>ITT: people who don't know that you can have firewalls without NAT

>>59121147
no u

>>59116229
Its completely wrong and shows that he doesn't understand how the internet works. Every device having a public IP is not only not possible due to routers, but would be a security catastrophe.

>>59121330
7/10

>>59121341
That's giving him too much credit

>>59116464
>if you can't put up with my ineptitude you must be miserable

>>59120938
>You don't know how firewalls work.
Then why don't you explain.

>>59116670
*whomst

>>59116395
Is the most misused term on g. So annoying.

>>59116142
It is a waste given that are millions of devices and routers can perform port forwarding, but depends of your needs.
Speed vs ip saving

>>59120883
maak mij een broodje smos