PRO TIP: If you haven't installed FF 64 bits, do it fucking now!

"64-bit Firefox has limited plugin support."

How much do I shoot myself in the foot following your advice, anon?

File: Pale-Moon-logo.png (84KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 256x256px

>>59107301
Install Furry Moon

File: 32isbetter.png (107KB, 911x347px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 911x347px

>>59107301
Am I missing any speed improvements?

>>59107425
Out of the 3 plugins you use, which one of them is not supported in the 64-bit version?

>>59107451
>ESR fork
Might as well get the proper software (Firefox ESR).

>>59107485
I was hoping to avoid this .. I'll check.

>>59107301
SHIT SHIT SHIT!!!
How do i install this in raspbian linux!!!???
Im a linux noob and im forcing myself to survive with only the raspberry pi 3b for the next year so i can finally force myself to learn linux. I handed my computer off to my best friend and told him to refuse to hand it to me no matter how much i might beg.
Help me anon-wan-kenobi! Yer muh only hope..

>>59107538
Raspbian is only a 32 bit OS, despite the Pi 3 being 64 bit capable.

File: Untitled.png (53KB, 657x326px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 657x326px

>>59107301
>not EME-free
enjoy your botnet

>>59107538
>>59107554
looks like there is a suse linux 64 for the rpi 3

>>59107538
3 weeks ago I asked /g/ for some tips and tricks on getting a pi 3 as a main computer for my 5 year old brother.

My 5 year old brother doesn't have this problem because he is comptetent. How do you feel? :^)

>64 bit
You know less than my 5 year old brother.

>>59107570
>Encrypted Media Extensions (EME) is a JavaScript API for playing DRMed video content in HTML. A DRM component called a Content Decryption Module (CDM) decrypts, decodes, and displays the video. A JavaScript program coordinates the process using the EME API to pass messages between the CDM and a server that provides decryption keys and content.

Where do you even find DRM content? What obscure websites do you visit, Anonymous?

>>59107301
I've had it for over a year now

>>59107583
You're responding to your brother

>>59107301
>using the SJW browser in the current year

>>59107609
I was helping a friend access netflix on her mint desktop. Apparently drm was at least part the reason that she had to go with chrome. Apparently.

>>59107639
S-Spoopy

>>59107660
But I am an sjw, senpai.

>>59107665
Fair enough.

>>59107683
>I'm fat and have blue hair

>>59107614
around 6 years here

$ apt search firefox-esr | grep installed
firefox-esr/testing,now 45.7.0esr-4 amd64 [installed,automatic]

>>59107301
Does it actually provide better performance?

File: welcome_newfriend.gif (24KB, 456x411px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 456x411px

>>59107698
jk lol rofl

>>59107715
it doesn't crash on xvideos anymore

File: 1476367835678.png (169KB, 600x514px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 600x514px

>>59107570
>uses windows, calls other software botnet
TOP KEK!

wintoddlers are fucking retarded.

>technology board
>just finding out about 64-bit firefox

Sad!

>>59107683
>But I am an sjw, senpai.
so why are you on 4chan?!

Anyway, I'm not seeing much guidance on what's meant by extensions not working. Is there a dististinction between plugins and extensions? Is this something so basic that nobody even mentions it? For starters I don't want to lose 'digger reloaded'. I use that on almost every page.

>>59107806
Gathering intelligence mostly. It's hard. I'm not finding much. Have you seen any?

>>59107728
Kill yourself, you dumb fucking shit stain.

>>59107814
I havent ran into an add-on that hasnt worked, I have about 14 installed. You could always just try and and see for yourself. It's not like it's permanent.

>>59107719
not using bitporno hd

>>59107888
not personally penetrating the pornstars

>>59107856
You have, okay thanks for the input. That doesn't sound like an issue then.

>>59107898
glad I could help

>>59107845
>windows children this mad

>>59107951
systemd, yea or nay?

>>59107301
no

>>59107995
so, dropping the memes and shitposting for a second-
do you actually believe that systemd is botnet, and windows is therefore perfectly ok, because "linux is a botnet anyway because of systemd so its not like I can do any better?"

File: 136.gif (3MB, 400x225px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 400x225px

>>59108024
is that a yea?

File: averageMozillaprogramerPrograming.png (3MB, 1920x1025px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1025px

>>59107301
JUST

File: laughing sluts.png (490KB, 449x401px) Image search: [Google]

490KB, 449x401px

>>59108183
>ABP
>NoScript
>Netflix

>>59108099
Can you not drop the retarded jockeying for internet superiority points to answer one question, anon?

File: Mel.jpg (25KB, 582x640px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 582x640px

>>59108183

File: Capture.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>59107301
>$CURRENT YEAR
>firefox 51

>>59108278
is it actually better

File: 1468026430568.jpg (13KB, 265x400px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 265x400px

>>59108236
Not really. I don't know what you're talking about. I saw you talking to that other guy from an non-windows point of view and merely asked you your opinion, yea or nay, about systemd, which you never answered. I don't know what you're going on about.

Anyway, I'm off to bed. Toodles.

>>59108298
it gets all the improvements months before the stable branch does, so yes.
It's noticeably faster than all other firefox branches, with the exception of developer edition. A few weeks ago I downloaded ungoogled chromium to compare the speeds between the two browsers, and I found that they were for the most part the same.
Chromium was probably a bit faster on average, but it's something you'd only notice if you have both open in front of you at the same time.
Regular firefox compared to chromium, however, was embarrassing.

>>59108313
The answer is just shrug, btw.

>>59108335
g'night

File: 1468797881467.png (258KB, 652x412px) Image search: [Google]

258KB, 652x412px

>>59107301
I'm fine thanks

File: 1483409411388.jpg (36KB, 356x314px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 356x314px

>>59108374
>32 bit

>>59108391
Yeah I dunno anon, I can't find the 64-bit version of the dev edition

Someone linked it in a previous thread but it just installed 32-bit

Like it matters anyway

>>59107894
>not having a gf

>>59107471
It's hard to say. A lot of older AMD64 builds displayed inferior performance when compared to i386 builds. But there advantages to having an object code that makes use of 64-bit such as more memory or security. I haven't come across any recent benchmarks for recent builds, but the i386 build does boast better compatibility.

>>59108417
*gf whose virginity you took and hasn't ridden the cock carousel, rather

>>59107471
If you have the CPU horsepower you can send performance through the roof by giving a higher value to

dom.ipc.processCount

As far as I can tell this setting is where other forks of FF get 80% of their extra performance

File: Untitled.png (227KB, 652x377px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 652x377px

hi

What about chromium

>>59108517
holy fuck update it you animal

File: 1484788018366.jpg (103KB, 540x720px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 540x720px

>>59108209
>>59108183
YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS SHIT UP

>>59108613
but it breaks my addon and adds new useless config!

>>59108668
what a shame!

>>59108700
me really sad!

>>59107301
Will it run on my 32-bit computer though?

>>59107665
>>59107689
Apparently not. Enabling the DRM plugin for Netflix in Firefox on its own won't work, but changing its user agent to a recent Chrome one in addition to that will let Netflix play just fine in Firefox. Had to figure this out in my own since I refuse to use Chrome. IOW, Netflix is being a little bitch about compatibility.

>using tumblrzilla sjwfox

>>59107554
shit the pi-3 is 64-bit capable? I've had mine running as a server for ages and totally overlooked that. Thanks anon, I'll check out some 64-bit stuff for it.

>>59107301
How about YOU WATCH YOU FUCKING MOUTH YOU LITTLE PIECE OF SHIT!

Is it faster than waterfox?

>>59109396
By default? No

Vivaldi vs Opera vs Chromium?

>>59107301
So it can adress more than 4GB of RAM?
...for what purpose?

File: 1470439166681.png (41KB, 378x558px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 378x558px

>>59109511
I only have about 10 tabs open

>>59109527
Mine only uses 400MB

>>59109534
I wish mine was that low, lately CPU and RAM usage has been going through the roof

It's becoming more and more Chrome-ish with every update

Stop using 32bit browser, faggots

64bit has surpassed it in speed

>>59109501
Vivaldi >>>>>>>>>>>>> Opera >> Chromium

>>59107301
I use Nightly.

>>59107570
>Bawww I can use it to watch netflix. So it's a botnet.
kys

>>59109901
I'd agree if there was a way for me to completely remove the sidebar bullshit

I don't want to use it just to see my downloads

>>59109918
Have you tried hitting F4?

>>59109926
Yes I know you can hide it but I don't want it, at all.

File: file.png (59KB, 417x413px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 417x413px

>tfw 32-bit CPU

>>59109947
Chirst anon, I'm so sorry

>>59109941
Dunno what to tell you then, anon. It only pops out if I download something and I can instantly get rid of it by pressing F4. That doesn't bother me.

>>59109954
Don't worry, It's not my main machine

>>59109964
It might grow on me, overall I really like Vivaldi, that bar is the the *only* thing stopping me from swapping from Firefox

Perhaps in a later version they'll add an alternative

>>59107301
You know, I wasn't using it not because I didn't want to but because the default download was 32 bit. I sincerely thank you.

That makes me question, what is Waterfox supposed to be? I thought it was just the 64 bit fork of firefox.

>>59110084
It has a heap of "under the hood" changes

>>59107538
>best friend
>4lone.org
You lying

>>59110215
what's the font?

>>59108410
64 bit is slow anyway anon, binaries are larger so they take longer to load, and they use up more memory

the only people benefiting from 64 bit are merchants

>>59107301
windows users.

>>59110566
Gothic

The fuck is going on in this thread?
I'm using 64bit since forever. At least over 10 years. How can you still be using 32bit in 2017? Many distros are not even available in 32bit anymore, and even the loved oldschool thinkpads are supporting 64 bit since more than 10 years.
Did I just step into bizarro /g/?

File: 64bits.png (505KB, 1058x604px) Image search: [Google]

505KB, 1058x604px

Always

>>59108456
But it doesn't have to do with the build being 32bit or 64bit

>>59108668
Go for ESR.
What addons does new stable Firefox break?

>>59107301
Did that weeks ago senpai

Do you think developer edition has the best appearance (white/blue theme, icon)? I think it does.

>>59111993
>what is developers theme enabler

>>59112042
I dont know. Can it change the icon too?

>>59112057
I think it must work, yes.
I'm on pale meme atm, so can't test it.
Even if the dev theme enabler doesn't do that, it's still possible by modifying a few resources.

>>59107425
>He needs plugins in 2017

>>59112096
post your addon page

File: waterfox.png (42KB, 658x310px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 658x310px

>>59107301
I'd rather not.

>>59107301
Too lazy to reinstall and set everything up again.

>>59112111
Why?

File: About Mozilla Firefox.png (80KB, 698x366px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 698x366px

>>59107301
:^)

File: plugins.png (55KB, 1514x1080px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 1514x1080px

>>59112111
Addons aren't plugins.

File: teehee.png (26KB, 625x314px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 625x314px

>>59112176
oops

File: laughingicequeen.gif (3MB, 450x651px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 450x651px

>>59112195
>having Flash support in your browser at all
>not using the standalone Flash player for your shitty hentai Flash games

>>59112228
please teach me sempai. I have no idea what you are talking about,

>>59107498
It is maintained independently from FF now. The UI is great and it's faster than newest dev on my machine

>>59107570
>meme free
why

Legit question when is servo coming and will it be good

>>59107301
where the fuck do I even download that shit

their site is such a cuck wasteland, when I click the "download page" there is literally nothing and only one installer starts the auto download, I have no option to chose from anything

>>59112340
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/channel/desktop/

File: 587B3EAC2ACE4DB59705CF26E62F26322717000003B51B4A447E_tmp.jpg (149KB, 800x820px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 800x820px

>>59107301
>Not using Nightly

File: 1425592428783.gif (78KB, 182x250px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 182x250px

I once listened to /g/ and I regret it. Firefox Nightly is fucking shit! It's even slower than normal firefox and doesn't support the addons I need.

>>59112391
>Nightly
OP didn't post any Nightly Build you fagtron

wtf just updated yesterday and now every site i visit i get a fucking popup telling me i need to enable drm playback in order to watch the fucking adverts. fuuuuuuuuuuuuck off m8.
i'm to lazy to install adblockers

>>59107570
going to try this out now thanks based anon will it get rid of the shitty blue popup bar?

>>59112401
That's because you responded to bait you fagtron

>>59112414
no u

>pale moon doesn't have tree style tabs

into le trash it goes

>>59112228
>using flash at all

stop being a moron

>>59112465
But how else will I play my shitty Flash based hentai games ?

>>59112488
Ask yourself, are shitty hentai games worth using flash player aids?

>>59112488
maybe you should consider not?
especially since Flash is a horribly insecure VM that is virtually on life support at this point?

>>59112498
Eh. As long as I stick to the one shitty hentai game I have on my HDD, yeah. I don't have Flash support in my browser at all, just use the standalone player for that one shitty hentai game.

>wake up
>there is unironically a thread about 64-bit firefox with 100+ replies
Did I time travel back to 2010 or something?

>>59112607
it's windags

what did you expect? quality threads?

>>59112607
desu most of the thread is shilling for nightly, pale moon, some other moon, other forks and more shit
and hate for flash
about 2 posts are about firefox

>>59107609
Amazon uses that.

You explicitly need to enable it, though.

>>59107425
Everything works just fine.

>>59107471
Its smoother for me.

>>59112131
You dont have to, everything is transferred automatically.

Quite tempted to try it again.

Saw this emailed to me - https://testpilot.firefox.com/experiments/snooze-tabs

Seems like a neat idea.

>>59107301
If you have to use firefox, use the developer edition.

>>59114675
Are you a fucking manchild? you need your browser to be a nanny? how fucking stupid are you that you can't control what you do on a daily basis?

>>59112557

>Just one

Which one is it?

File: 2017-02-25_12-49-11.png (652KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

652KB, 1920x1080px

>>59107301
>>59107451
>>59107471
>>59107570
>>59108374
>>59108517
>>59111286
>>59112126
>>59112174
>>59112388

Plebs

>inb4 : Pajeet botnet

Don't forget to enable multi process firefox too.

>>59115085
>Getting cucked by Mozilla and Microsoft at the same time

File: 1405489414157.jpg (219KB, 800x1000px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 800x1000px

>>59115225
>Getting cucked by Google and Stallman, or as I've recently taken to calling it, Google plus Stallman.

>>59115062
SDT