Ryzen 7 1800X Vs Core i7 6900K Gaming Performance Benchmarked

This is fake

File: 1487801576360.png (245KB, 800x612px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 800x612px

>>59105983

>1800x 95w

that's how you know it's a fucking lie.

>>59106073
Forgot your pills? AMD's own slides put the 1800X at 95W TDP

>>59105913
>>59105990
Shut the fuck up with the spamming you fucking jew. If you at least had any income about it I get it. You are so autistic with your repeated spamming from your yesterday that you are obviously clueless about tech.

File: blessed-by-golden-pajeet.jpg (122KB, 634x822px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 634x822px

>>59105913
>wffc
nice.

>>59106085
AMD is lying, I know from sources that it pulls over 200 watts

File: file.png (1MB, 1024x724px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1024x724px

We will fight for the right of the OP to shill for our services and we will deposit 5 shekels to his corporate account.

>>59106073
it's at least 145.

>>59105983
>>59106089
>>59106105
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6vAKT0eGvE

>>59106089
¨That man was killed for his shirt.

So fucking fake. Fuck AMD.

>>59106102
your dad works at Nintendo?

>>59105913

>Pootech

"""""""
""""""""""""
""""""""""""no
""""""""""""
"""""""

File: INTEL BTFO.png (245KB, 800x612px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 800x612px

>>59106088

>>59105913
AMDomination

Question: are the cores in Ryzen CPUs full ones?
Not like the old ones where two cores shared one FPU.

>>59106440
AMD is pulling the same shit with Bulldozer, a lot of weak cores and pretending anything uses more than 4 cores it doesn't AMD and everyone educated knows this

>>59106168
Was it actually stolen? I know he was beaten to death but I don't know if they actually took the shirt
>>59106440
There's no FlexFPU
>>59106498
Their cores are faster than Kaby Lake at the same clocks you stupid shill

>>59106504
>at the same clocks, too bad you would have to use liquid nitrogen to overclock ryzen as far as kaby.

>>59106527
Yeah, and to OC Kaby to 5 Ghz you need to delid your processor breaking your warranty and easily damaging your CPU, get a golden chip and have brutal cooling
We don't really know how Zen will OC, so far people are getting it to 4.1 Ghz with the 95W stock cooler, and there's rumors that the 5.1 Ghz run was limited to just breaking the Cinebench world record

>>59106596
i have mine running at 5.1ghz under an aircooler try harder my man, amd is going to do well with their release they don't need you lying for them.

>>59106618
What voltage?

>>59106631
1.375

>>59106663
Jesus my Nehalem ran at that voltage overclocked.

>>59106663
it's warm yes but it's not going to burn itself to the ground.

>>59106675
*shrug* i will run it into the ground and look at what's out when i'm ready for a new thing. maybe ryzen will appeal to me then, i just think the benchmarks right now are all kind of jew tactics

>>59106675
Who cares? It's still better than fx9590.

>>59106704
Not claiming it isn't, but that voltage I consider near the suicide line for FinFET

>>59106618
>things that never happened
The 7700K needs delidding to reach past 4.8 Ghz fucking shill

File: REEEEEE.jpg (171KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 800x600px

>>59106088
>being this mad

>>59105913
who the fuck games on a 6900k? Try the 7700k next time, faggots.

>>59106726
Except it doesn't?

>Comparing FPS of a shitty game

Kek

>>59106778
most did, some golden chips didn't need it

all i care about are the price drops

>>59105983
sup trump

>>59106726
it didn't and doesn't, this idiocy needs to stop.

File: maymay.jpg (48KB, 320x261px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 320x261px

>The year is 2048, AMD's latest offering RyZen++^2xprox6999 sports a die size of 4,047,000,000 mm2, 956,000,000 cores, a clock speed of 10khz, tdp of 6.5 MW and 22,400,000 times more multi-core throughput than Intel's latest offering, the i7-9x98700k which supersedes the i7-9x97700k that released 4 days ago, and packs 5 cores and 9 threads on a chip the size of a water molecule, a TDP of .05 milliwatts, and a 6.5ghz base clock with 40ghz turbo boost. Intel fans across the world rejoice at the 1 fps lead over the RyZen++^2xprox6999 in 4d pinball this next generation silicon provides and are many are expressing relief that their windows 10 PC is no longer locked and asking them to upgrade their processor.

File: heatenings.jpg (5KB, 173x200px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 173x200px

I bought i7 6700 not even k

>>59106838
This would make sense if Ryzen had a bigger die than the 6900K, which it doesn't
Ryzen is smaller and more power efficient than Intel right now

>>59106839
kek c uck

>>59106678
max temps? wondering if i should bump my 6700k up to 1.35 to get 4.8 stable

>>59107808
75 -80 under load.

According to a Turkish tech site that is now testing 1800x with 1080;

When you are testing it against 6xxx series 8 and 10 cores of intel, it outshines them a bit on stock.

BUT when you just OC it a bit in bios, it simply has no competition.

IT SIMPLY HAS NO COMPETITION!!!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhKmeCdB914 [Embed]

Check 9.45 at 0.25 speed. You can see one of the test scores but I can't make it! Any CSI guy here who can enhance the image???!?!?!?!?!?!

I can't make out the image, anyone who can help with the video?

>>59108057
In le gaming xD
Run a stress test or do some editing and it'll melt.

>mfw i still dont need to upgrade my i7-4770

>Same 3 AMD sponsored games in every "leak"

Hmm

>>59106596
they are gettign 4.1 on 1700, no idea how good 1800x do

>>59106160
Thats possbily one of the worst examples I have seen for a long time.
Even people in the comments section have realised this!

File: NRTU.png (194KB, 1439x947px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 1439x947px

>>59111097
Same.

The only heavily threaded thing I do is the occasional WebM creation, harldy seems worth it.

My checklist is that the 1700 needs to hit 4.2-4.5 stable (which it might do after some non retarded overclockers get their hands on it), and support 3600 memory, if these don't seem possible after release, them I'm keeping this system for another generation at least.

>comparing to the 6900k instead of the 6700 or 7700k
What did AMD mean by this?

>>59106088
kek.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8JLBq4xoAw

>>59105913
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH THE9600X IS 5 YEARS OLD AMD BTFO TO THE BONE

PLEASE MAKE IT STOP

>>59111841
8c vs 8c

Rumors circulating that Intel is quietly trying to bribe and bully reviewers into framing reviews to make Zen look bad.

Intel's seriously scared of RyZen. They're completely unprepared for something this powerful and cheap, and their small victories in encoding or virtualization won't save them in a majority of their markets.

File: nuke.jpg (25KB, 418x279px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 418x279px

Intel BTFO.