Poo

>>59086829
I'll pretend you're actually retarded here and not baiting.

They still have R5 and R3 to come out. The cheapest R7 just BTFO the 3rd most expensive i7

File: 1487887328580.jpg (142KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1280x720px

>>59086855
>BTFO 3rd most expensive i7

Simply not true

File: 1487789493624.jpg (156KB, 633x758px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 633x758px

>>59086829

>Bulldozer 2.0
>the cheapest ryzen is more expensive than an i5

>>59086855

They are barely beating those high-end i7. I think the r5 and r3 will be close to intel mid-range.

>>59086879
4fps difference on an Nvidia based game at 1920*1080
>Gayming
Wowsers!

Now try again with more than one shitty example

>>59086879
Intel shills call out amdrones for cherry picking benchmarks
Intel shills use a single bench mark to say amds new chip is shit
Really makes you think

the amount of amd shilling on this board i horrendous. Every single fucking time a new poo in the loo comes out.

>>59086879
>Gayming
>CPU test
>Nvidia based game

$329> $350 is what you're saying

File: Intel_fags.png (234KB, 800x612px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 800x612px

>>59086829

>>59086829
in germany the 7700k and 1700 are exactly the same price

>>59087045
well that's cause your all cucks

>>59087045
because Ryzen isn't being released worldwide yet, therefore you have to import it and importers are price gouging because they can.

>>59087045
Ryzen 5/3 is 7700k competitor.
Lower core count, higher clock, better for gaming.

Bulldozer is 8 shitty cores

Ryzen is 8 nigger cores with the power to kill Intel

>>59086829
>judging the entire ryzen lineup off of their i7 equivalent tier (which is fucking good for the price points it covers)
>>59086885
nice samefagging. even retards on /g/ couldn't fall for this bait, but you did make me reply 5/10

>>59087183
you can think that, but really, games run good enough on 8 cores that the slight fps loss isn't a big deal, but when games use all 8 cores it shits on 4 cores or even all 4 cores and something pops up in the background like fucking chrome eating 25% processing power right now like a fucking cocksucker, and that will impact the gameplay, while on 8 cores you wouldn't even notice.

File: 1460138389791.jpg (12KB, 474x473px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 474x473px

>he thinks that those 3 are the only ryzen cpus

>>59086879
>overclocked
>1 fps less
really makes you think

>>59089422
Average means nothing, It's the minimum that matters

>>59086829
>AMD still hasn't learned anything from Bulldozer
I'm still waiting for the official reviews, but that's just not true.

They abandoned the stupid Bulldozer style of multi-threading with a single core and embraced the simpler but much more reliable SMT that Intel has been using for hyper-threading for years now.

That alone is a learned trait right there.

>>59086885
What are Series 5 and Series 3

File: 428.jpg (56KB, 878x814px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 878x814px

>>59086829
>he doesn't know there's a r5 and r3

File: whaaa.jpg (16KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 500x500px

>>59089481
Actually the fact that Ryzen has basically the same avg FPS as a 7700K but a lower Maximum means that frames are more consistent on Ryzen

>>59086829
>You don't know there are four and six core variants coming
>You're unaware 1800X beats Intel's best consumer chip
>You fell for the Intel meme
>Trying this hard to defend your shitty purchase

>>59086879
>benchmarking CPU performance on Max Settings

does it finally support sse4 and allow me to emulate arm android as well as play ps2?

>>59086829
>>59086879
>AMD matches Intel's gaming performance at lower clock speeds while completely annihilating them in productivity for $20 less
>This is somehow problematic
Really oodles my noodles.

>>59086829
>>59086885
>the cheapest ryzen
...will be $130, will launch in H2 2017, and will bring i5 performance to i3 budgets, just as the 4c8t R5 will bring i7 performance to i5 budgets in Q2 2017

File: IMG_20170224_110932.jpg (834KB, 1080x1874px) Image search: [Google]

834KB, 1080x1874px

this is why its important here in Australia

>>59086829
>intel losing the mobile market
>intel losing the console market
>Now intel is going to lose the consumer market
gg intel

>>59090397
Is it an AMD country now?

What are AMD and Nvidia GPUs like there?

>>59090476
low tier gamers stick to nvidia, but its a 65/35 split. most people would never buy a 1080, it still costs over $1000 (765 usd)

>>59086829
Ryzen 7 is competing with the i7
The Ryzen 5 will be competing with the i5

>>59086879
>max settings

>>59090469
Server market?

>>59090800
>The Ryzen 5 will be competing with the i5
Ryzen 3 1000 (119 usd) will be the poorfag chip

>>59086829
>>59086879
you tell me
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWEHs_R5t9s

>>59086829
The 1700 competes with chips like the 6850K, not with fucking i5s. That's what the 3 and 5 series are for.

File: datass.png (1MB, 842x800px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 842x800px

>>59090834

>he doesn't know about Naples

File: it sure does.jpg (163KB, 1837x1009px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 1837x1009px

>>59090885
stop conflating more cores with better performance.

>>59087028
>>59087004
>implying nvidia based game matters or he fucking CPU

Holy fuck. Leave and never come again

>>59090913
>no information about system specs, chipset, memory,

Paired with the fact that this breaks from other leaked benchmarks and without knowing how well Zen OCs, that graph is pretty much meaningless.

>>59091022
it's quite clearly from a video ya genius
also this goes exactly along with the graphs
this is a benchmark of gta 5 compared to a kabby lake 7700k, not a broadwell 6900k
and the 1700 has like a 3ghz clock speed while the 770k has a 4.2-4.5ghz clock speed

>>59089785
Good man. Also the reason for this is probably a mixture of a bigger cache (although they probably needed it because of worse design) and good algorithmic design to avoid cache misses (whaa surely contradictory :^) ? Maybe. Maybe the big cache is to make up for cache misses that would cripple performance. Maybe well made software don't have that many cache misses so it's not showing in tests...)

Anyway ya'll fucklords. Go do something decent with your time until the real multitask benchmarks.

>>59090860
where does he show his ryzen cpu?

>>59086855
no, no it did not. one 1700x overclocked benchmarked higher than one non overclocked 7700k in userbench. however the average userbench score for that 7700k is 30 points higher than the shill benchmark and 16 points higher than the 1700x. don't fucking lie, it's still a nice processor it doesn't need you to lie for it.

>>59086897
they're barely beating stock boosted 7700k on their maximum overclocks. they're fucked.

>>59090860
Did they get that video taken down for breaking NDA? I see their official channel is missing that video.

>>59090913
>conflating

yeah i guess you are right..
meanwhile on a serious site https://www.computerbase.de/2017-02/cpu-skalierung-kerne-spiele-test/

>>59086829
AMD is so fucking awful. I can't wait until that piece of shit company is dead in the ground. Hopefully Ryzen will be the nail in the coffin.