1700x confirmed to do 4.5ghz. Higher IPC than Kaby.

N O I C E
O
I
C
E

Holy shit

That's fucking impressive.

http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-Ryzen-7-1700X-Turbo-Disabled-vs-Intel-Core-i5-7500/m243187vs3648

Meanwhile here it shows the 1700x getting cucked by the i5-7500 in single threaded performance. INTEL WINS AGAIN RYZEN DOA. AMD FAGS BTFO

>>59083931

i think that was a relative hypotethical scenario, no where does it show the cpu actually running 4.5ghz.

just saying.

>>59084072
>Turbo-Disabled

>>59083931
Maybe I'm being a bit of a sperglord with this, but Ryzen has more cache on every level.

L1: 64K+32K vs 32K+32K
L2: 512K vs 256K
L3: 8MB vs 6MB

>>59084167
not like it fucking matters you AMDrone.

if it can barely match a shitty i5 it has no chance against the 7700k ill spend the extra $50 and take my far superior single thread performance.

AMD IS FINISHED JUST ACCEPT IT ALREADY.

>>59083931
confirmed to do 4.5ghz which matches intel stock boost, overclocked chip barely beats stock chip, good goy.

>>59084263
you could take 250 less and get a pentium gxxx for your gaymen

>>59083931
>average single thread score for 7700k on userbench is 140

earning those rupees today, eh pajeet?

>>59084263
Is that why AMD stocks skyrocketed? Get a grip you basement dwelling weeb.

>>59084563
>Cheaper overclocked chip is better
That's all I needed to know

>>59084120
I think you're right, but it's interesting that the 1700x's crossover point for 140 pts. would have been 4.3 GHz, which seems not that far from stock turbo limits.