Linux Distro Performance

>>59079407
Gentoo

>>59079407
install temple

>>59079419
This is probably the best way to go.

>>59079413
Why Gentoo over Arch?

if you're going to use it just for browsing porteus kiosk i'd say, it doesn't even come with a DE, it's just browser of your choice (chromium/firefox) + just enough os

if you'll use it for anything else lxle or bodhi linux

>>59079484
Cause with gentoo you compile every package for your system, so the programs are a bit faster.

NixOS

>>59079684
>so the programs are a bit faster.
at the cost of 20$ more in electricity

>>59079407
"Performance" is meaningless without context. What task do you want to perform well at?

>>59079407
This is the only question where answering Gentoo is not a joke

kevinOS is the best distro in the existence of the universe.

If you don't agree, ikey will penetrate ur mum this night

>>59079407
it just depends on if you know how to set up your os properly

>editing config files all day so you can turn in your homework in .ODF format
Arch
>being a literal fedora tipper
Fedora
>being a productive member of society
openSUSE
>putting a 15 year old computer on life support
Void
>getting botnetted by Kevin
Solus

>>59079407
If you ask the question like a typical desktop pleb, it's "all the same performance".

> Or should I install reactOS and say FUCK YOU to Linux?
Do you want to prove your autism or use Linux?

>>59079909
>openSUSE
That's such a non-distribution to me. I know it's a big name but I don't even know what kind of package/software installation it uses. My /g/ cred is so low.

>>59079957
YaST/zypper
.RPM, tar, .deb

>>59079957
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pacman/Rosetta

Bookmark it if you distrohop sometimes.

>>59079699
Read the question/topic.
It is about performance.
Not about electricity bill.