BSD thread?
No.
Am I the only one who read "BSD dead"? Thanks, Freud.
>>59077675
Our time will come, my friend.
>>59077733
BSD is dead. It was alive long enough.
>>59077748
Your time has already left
cuck license
/thread
What a terrible post, OP. You should only make a thread when you have something to say.
Your post was meaningless. Just like FreeBSD's security team.
Which is why I use OpenBSD.
>>59078023
>no MAC or RBAC
>one of the weakest ASLR implementations, simply exists for epeen purposes
>still considers chroot secure
>reduces the amount of buffers it gives to a NIC because it can't handle high pps
>makes a syscall layer wrapper after it's been proven those are insecure(pledge)
>ancient filesystem
What the fuck are you talking about?