I have a question about CPUS
For the purposes of gaming, do we really get that much benefit out of buying the latest at greatest CPU? I'm currently running an i7 860 @ 4ghz. This is now a pretty ancient processor. However, how much better would a new processor, say a mid-range ryzen, run a game if both systems had the same GPUs? Say a GTX 1080. Nobody ever seems to actually benchmark these things, everybody just says "Oh well that CPU is X years old so obviously it'll kill your framerate" and i'm sure it does effect the framerate to a degree, but i'm having a hard time believing the CPU i have currently, which barely hits 70% load in games, is really holding me back that much. (At the moment i've got a GTX770) I'm wondering why i should bother dropping $500-700 on a new CPU/Mobo/Ram setup when i could put that money into a new GPU?
Has anyone actually ever seen benchmarks of something like this?
>>59073738
It depends on what you play, but it can definitely matter, and yes there are benchmarks for it.
>>59073773
That's more a comparison of different current CPUs though, not CPUs from the first few generations of "modern" computers (High power quad cores)
>>59073738
>For the purposes of gaming, do we really get that much benefit out of buying the latest at greatest CPU?
No. You want a mid-range CPU with a couple of really strong cores, since nothing is fucking multithreaded still in fucking 2017.
>>59073738
Your cpu is ancient. It's slower than modern i3s.