Why is GoySync so expensive? It adds like £150-200 to the same

At this point I'm considering giving up on it even though I have a GTX 1080

>>59073628
get one and keep it fore 7 years

>>59073668
that's what I thought when I got my previous monitor

now it doesn't support shit

>>59073628
Because they can charge what they want for it, and because it requires the monitors to have a proprietary chip embedded. AMD is using Adaptive Sync to accomplish the same task, which is an open standard and requires no additional licensing.

>>59073770

Yep

Nvidiots will try to defend G-Sync

Cause it fucking works much better than the poorfag alternative.
Nvidia charges money for quality products while nobody sane would buy AMD garbage alternatives.

>>59073809
The good free-sync displays are basically no different from the G-sync displays

>>59073809
>works much better than freesync
>all you need to do is buy a brand name like acer, aoc, asus
prove it
>nvidia will defend needing a chip when the standard exits

What even exactly is gsync? It's like hardware vsync? I don't get what it does that doesn't happen already?

>>59073947
Actually uses smarts so that the GPU and monitor are always talking at the same frequency so there is no screen tearing, and they know what frequency each other is at.

I'm a freesync user and it definitely is better than not having it in my opinion. Not sure I'd pay extra for it but I'm all AMD here so that's not really an issue.

>>59073787
You called it right on time, see
>>59073809