Why does Pale Moon always fail at this and how is it relevant?

Sorry link here

http://acid3.acidtests.org/

>>59069533
>>59069499
Ok I got dubs twice in a row now so someone pls respond to the thread. I'm not a shitposter.

>>59069499
wtf with your font rendering? Mine got this test flawlessly.

works on firefox esr

>99/100
What gives?

>>59070125
try refreshing

>>59069499
edge is fine, so is chrome. IE gets 100 but has a tiny pink line in the corner

Wasn't this a meme some years ago when firefox removed a pretty much unused function?

>>59070214
It was a meme way back before 2010 because everything failed it all the time.

The fact anything doesn't pass this perfect now is inexcusable.

File: new.png (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

>>59069499
1 second on Google Botnet

>>59070214
Mozilla refused to support a particular non-standard function so for a long time Firefox technically failed the test. Eventually the developers of the test just removed the non-standard functionality and they finally passed but Mozilla didn't really give a fuck by that point. Newest hotness is HTML5 compliance and javascript performance.

>>59069499
99/100 on firefags here. lol it used to be 100. do they even regression test?

>>59070493
this
>>59070151
worked for me

>>59070016
I have cleartype turned off on Windows.

chrome canary can't handle

99/100 also my yellow square is just grey

>>59070809
so it has the same issue as firefags. i'm on beta though and tweaked my config a bit

>>59070809
The test is not very good. It gets screwed up easily and renders wrong even on compliant web browsers. The second one of these tests was far more reliable