U AMD FAG?
What's the release date for the 1600X?
>>59069406
Only single thread matters past 4 cores anyway.
>>59069436
201600
>>59069406
No I love Intel and will never buy AMD ever. Even if AMD was objectively worse. I'm in love with Intel, get it?
>>59069406
7700k is running at a higher frequency
>>59069447
I hate you.
>>59069451 (You)
I meant objectively better
>>59069406
>The Ryzen 5 mid-range CPU pisses all over i7's
Fuck, at this rate the Ryzen 7's are going to literally come out of the box and give a good, 16 thread ass fucking to Intel.
> shitty single threaded performance
into the bin it goes
>>59069406
single thread scores
7700k
>4.5GHz (single core boost)
>2237
R5 1600X (single core boost)
>3.7GHz
>1888
now let's scale to compare IPC:
>4.2/3.7= 1.216...
>1888 x 1.216...= 2296.216...
out of curiosity I wanted to see the extrapolated mt scores at that clock
>12544 x 1.216...= 15256.216...
not super scientific but it is an interesting insight to look at until next Thursday when reviews drop
>>59069594
Not really that much better considering it is an eight core.
Its actually extremely impressive.
>>59069657
INTO THE BIN. Literally 90% of what I do is single threaded. The rest 10% is not even fully multithreaded, just 2-3 core.
99-core CPUs are a stupid meme.
They pulled the same last time.
when they going to bring back single core cpu?
>>59069677
your entire post is literally "REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"
>>59069706
Probably around the time they start using ribben serial cables again instead of sata
>>59069677
joke's on you
i'm gonna run multithread benchmarks all day
get rekt intelfag
>>59069706
even routers use dual cores now, get over it.
>>59069621
so, it has slightly better IPC than kaby lake at the same clock speed?
wow
>>59069886
I consider it "within margin of error" since those scores fluctuate each time it's tested.
we need to see how far Ryzen can be pushed in non-ln2 systems before judging the clock speeds, but they have their work cut out with Kaby clocks
>>59069578
Is the i3 series basically kill
>>59070009
Intel is for budget builds now.
B-But synthetic benchmarks mean nothing! Nothing is going to use all those cores! AMD MOAR CORES AMIRITE FELLAS
>>59070054
>Budget builds
>Cost twice as much as competition
The CPU market gonna get fucking rocked
>>59069406
>no clockspeeds
|
|>
|
|3
|
>>59070086
Good. Intel making 3 generations of CPUs all have the same performance was inexcusable.
>>59069406
>performs better than a 6850k for the fraction of the price
LOL YEAH AMD BTFO!!!!!!!!!!
>>59069406
>>59069594
you're not good at numbers are you
>>59069706
why the fuck would you want that? you'd get horrible performance
>>59069451
Cucky Mcfucky the post. Go fanboy on consoles you fucking faggot. I'm all about price and performance and Intel has been a bunch of Jews so they can fuck off.
>>59070234
No. You are the idiot. I don't play games at all. But I love Intel because I'm past discussing two different proc firms.
>>59069406
>Merchant is so desperate to shill that he forgot the "MAD" in his comment
top fucking kek
>>59069677
Your miniscule use case doesn't matter. Ryzen has enough single threaded performance for 99% of users, including GAYMURZ. Go away.
>>59070668
Amada is the best girl
>>59070668
Most AAA games are multithreaded (UI thread, AI, etc).
>>59070601
Cucky Mcfucky
>>59070745
It's not a bottleneck like FX series was.
>>59070772
Fuck yourself. And go play your games.
>>59069657
6 core.
>>59070909
And you are hard. Core. I mean it.
>amazing at multi threading
>shitty at single thread
I fucking hate AMD so much. Why do those fucks keep forcing me to buy fucking intel for gaming?
FINISHED. AND. BANKRUPT.
>>59072252
>shitty at single thread
lmao, the IPC is even higher than Kaby.
>>59069444
I'll just add this to my list of things busted ass Intel buyers tell themselves to keep from silently weeping in to their pillows at night.