What did AMD mean by this? Shitty quality is sources fault.
What is this? a screenshot of a screenshot of a screenshot?
>>59055573
FAKE
>>59055781
It isn't fake, intel is doomed. 1st atempt of AMD in the 14nm node and they nailed it.
>>59055809
Its shooped I can tell by the pixels
>>59055781
it's pretty consistent with the leaks
>>59055781
Think it's legit, just not sure why it's always cinebench, guess they are optimized for that
>>59055826
Because Intel is very good at cinnebench, it's their best case synthetic.
Skylake-E launches later this year and takes back the crown and Intel doesn't give a shit about AYYMD HOUSEFIRES inefficient garbage
>>59055573
1T = single threaded
NT = multi-threaded
Basically Ryzen scales better across cores than Intel's CPU do. This may or may not include a better SMT implementation.
>>59055848
Not really, it just used the AMD gimping Intel compiler.
It's the Sysmark benchmark that completely fucks over anything not Intel that AMD left the consortium over.
>>59055909
Sysmark is a joke, most reputable sites don't even use it.
>>59055818
This same picture will be out in the 28th, just wait and see.
>>59055862
Costing 1500 bucks everyone will laugh at them.
>>59055573
>10% performance with 20% higher clocks
DOA
>>59055984
Lel, you dumb shitwad, the 6900k turbos all cores to 3.4/3.5 and single core to 4.0, pretty much exactly the same as the Ryzen, and it's still slower.
The only difference is that one has a 35% lower TDP.
it's a slide from the presentation the reviewers got with their sample kit
it's real
>>59055984
Then there's you who probably actually believed kabylake was a +15% performance gain over skylake
well i mean, it was with HIGHER CLOCKS.
>>59055573
Seems that larger L3 and TDP didn't help Intel at all.
>>59055862
>Oh shit pack it up boys, Skylake-E is gonna blow Ryzen out of the water
Bitch please.