Why is tech no longer A E S T H E T I C, /g/?
>Why is tech no longer...
Because Apple happened and retards believe they are the pinnacle of """(((design)))"""
apple
they figured out how to design tech that appeals to women and it increased profits so everyone else did the same thing
>>59055080
you act like this is a bad thing, tech is supposed to help us and be useful to us, how is it doing its job if half the population doesn't know how to use it or isn't catered to.
>>59055050
>>59055080
So wait a sec, why are you screeching? You can still buy old computers if that's what you want. Those computers aimed to look and be better than those before them.
>>59055125
This is a beautiful picture. A note is that half of the "design" of old computers is figuring out to do with the fuckhuge bezel. All of the keyboards look great though.
That fucking aspect ratio on the right and some of you would say everything old is better. Do you remember 56k? Or having a "computer room?" Computers couldn't fit into a space the way they can today.
>>59055983
>That fucking aspect ratio on the right and some of you would say everything old is better. >Do you remember 56k? Or having a "computer room?"
All these things were genuinely better. Prove me right.
>>59055209
Because it's design.
Women should man up and use things they find ugly anyway. Function over form.
>>59054996
Because it actually didn't provide form over function.
>>59055983
>it's a keyboard hipster
>>59056132
or we could just, you know, go for function AND form because the two aren't mutually exclusive just because you tasteless shits think apple is the apex of design
>>59054996
whassat?
>>59055209
>an entire demographic becomes useless and unproductive unless it's catered to
Wow! That really made me think! I guess women really can be successful after all!
>>59056306
>it's a keyboard hipster
It's not
.>>59056306
>you tasteless shits
Show us some genuine taste. "You must be fun at parties."