Is Ultracopier the best copy/paste software?

Wtf is copy paste software

Get a life

>>59047076
Is this what using Windows is like?

File: 1478037719840.jpg (40KB, 720x720px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 720x720px

>>59047076

>>59047076
Reminds me of 2008 when I used to be a wintoddler with a shitty computer so I had to look for every ways to optimize my copy/paste with robocopy

Old, naive times

>>59047076
No.
/thread

File: 1456323866605.jpg (2MB, 2000x1200px)

2MB, 2000x1200px

>>59047115
basically

I don't know. I like TeraCopy personally.

I got the best results from FastCopy from the ones I tried

Also good explorer integration

File: 1483917142248.jpg (62KB, 1280x720px)

62KB, 1280x720px

>>59047076
>copy/paste software

>>59047076

>Copy engine

File: 1483444246077.png (102KB, 255x303px)

102KB, 255x303px

>>59047076
>windows is so shit it needs a dedicated copy/paste software

>>59049503
Linux also has this problem: https://github.com/coreutils/coreutils/blob/master/src/cp.c
>over 1000 lines just to copy a file
This is what happens when communists try to code

>>59047132
hory shet this is my father...

insisting winders is easier than leenoox

>>59049568
pretty sure your wankloze pajeets needed around 1500 lines of pure local hindi code to implement a file copy manager just to get replaced by random ones like wintoddler OP just posted.

Really makes you think.

FreeBSD is my favorite copy paste software, I can copy paste it as much as I want and even make money from it

Fast copy is.

>>59049568
>>59049611
but there is literally zero bloated code there. it is mostly well formatted and documented. you think you could do better? i doubt it to be honest.

>>59047076
no, rsync is

>>59047076
cp