>RX 480 >FX 8350 >50 FPS in GTA on High >mfw Why?

>>59044367
cpu bottleneck

>>59044367
Turn off advanced graphics, CPU should be in the 80fps range

>>59044408
Everything in advanced graphics is off, everything in normal graphics is on high, 2x MSAA, 8x An-isotropic Filtering

>>59044396
Would OC'ing help?

>>59044455
I have a 290X and 8120
I had to get the 8120 to 4.5GHz to hit 60 on max and that still had occasional dips

>>59044367
fucking retard
kill yourself

>>59044468
Welp, at least ryzen is right around the corner

>>59044483
Y-you too

>>59044494
sell your body to science

>>59044455
bump it up to 4.4

>>59044506
I actually want to do that when I die

>>59044528
Will try that, wanted to get it up to 4.7 which is why I got a water cooler

>>59044367
GTA is unoptimized trash
OC your CPU for best results
also >>>/v/

File: 1457970829895.jpg (385KB, 688x972px) Image search: [Google]

385KB, 688x972px

>>59044367
Go back to /v/ you dumb weeb

>>59044506
Tell me more

Running gtav at 50 with a 280x and n fx6100 @4.5ghz

>>59044557
Seems like all the games I like are unoptomized trash...GTA, ArmA, DayZ...

>>59044573
/v/ is pretty cancerous tbqh famalam

>>59044642
>tbqh famalam
maybe you're the one who's cancerous

>>59044642
Trying to OC is your only option
The only reason I'm even responding to you is because you gave me my new desktop wallpaper in the OP

>>59044573
>posts anime pic
>calls people weebs
>on an imageboard founded on anime
>which was founded by a weeb

when will you learn, you little pobrecito

>>59044669
>Not understanding irony

>>59044367
>low end cpu
>low end gpu
"WHY GAME NO RUN GOOD?????"

File: I wonder who could be behind this?.jpg (97KB, 500x667px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 500x667px

>>59044771
Go back to Israel novideo and Intel shill

>>59044771
AMD != Low end

>>59044771

RX 480 is by no means the best performance you can get, but calling it "low end" is just showing your bias.

File: 1463132274600.gif (2MB, 260x229px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 260x229px

>>59044703

in a similar boat except I have an intel 3570 and a 1060.
Check your GPU load and CPU load and the types of settings that affect FPS.
I get great framerates on ultra while still but when driving around they dip a lot, regardless of settings like AA and post-processing.
My CPU is at full load at these times but my GPU isn't, suggesting a bottleneck.
Just common sense.

>>59044795
That's their whole business model.
Best bang for your buck.
For your buck,
They are not the best bang.

>>59044860
Bang for your buck != low end

>>59044860
that's value, not low end. OP setup would be considered "mid grade"

>>59044642
Those games are optimised. I used to have an fx 8350 @4.4 ghz and I would get like 30 fps in Arma. You need to get an Intel processor like an i5-4690k. when I upgraded to that I get like 80+ frames in arma and gta

>>59044890
ArmA 2 or 3?

File: jew.gif (925KB, 236x192px) Image search: [Google]

925KB, 236x192px

>>59044890
Yes, just upgrade to an Intel processor! All your problems will be solved!

>>59044860
that's not necessarily true.
Bang for your buck means good value for money.
That doesn't necessarily mean the value is inherently lower than the competition though.

For example Macbooks are mad bang for your buck.
What you get for your money isn't really worth it.
However they're not the best on an objective level either, many of Apple's competitors sell higher spec ultrabooks for the same price or less or more.

>>59044792
Wtf is that image

>>59044963
Gooble Gobble https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9C4uTEEOJlM

>>59044899
Arma 3 mainly.

>>59044969
Wut

File: GTAV.png (47KB, 1299x1396px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 1299x1396px

>>59044367
You're doing something wrong

>>59045315
This
The game should be running fine
What OS are you using?

>>59044367
>FX 8350
HAHAHAHA

>>59044932
I think you're confusing cost and value
you're saying high cost items can still be high value
amirite

>>59045335
Win 7. I feel like this is the problem, because I just did an OC to 4.7 with 1.48 VCore and im still getting ~48ish FPS in the city. It drops as low as 28 for a few seconds in Franklins neighborhood. I want to upgrade to 10 but I dont know the situation with its spying and the flat design gives me actual headaches.

>>59045411
Windows 10 is even worse for games. Never upgrade to it. That, the spying, and the terrible UI makes it suicide tier
Try finding some kind of benchmarking software that will tell you what is being your bottleneck here

>>59045411
There wouldn't be a performance difference, your overclock may simply not be stable, reset everything to default and do a fresh install on your OS

what's your fps with all your settings on low? what's your resolution?

File: fast.jpg (57KB, 414x393px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 414x393px

>>59045337
>implying your CPU can go this fast

>>59044771

>RX 480
>Low end

fuck off JewVidia shill

OP here different computer

>>59045451
res is 1920x1080
in open areas like the pier and airport I get 60fps constant, but then im in city areas with buildings and shit i get 30-40. Also, when the number pedestrians in an area drops (when i kill them) the FPS goes up. So CPU issue? Iven when its clocked at 4.7ghz?

>>59045315
With everything on "high", FXAA on, anisotropic to 16x I get about about 40 fps in the city

>>59045532
>>59045451
Forgot to mention thats with everything on low, 1800p resolution, and its only a 10fps improvement

>>59045532
So set everything to low and report back some setting you're using it most likely very CPU intensive

http://www.gamersnexus.net/game-bench/1909-gta-v-graphics-optimization-guide

>>59045544
>>59045532
Hate you both

File: GTA5 2017-02-20 23-47-27-55.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>59044367
>50 FPS
Kek

File: spoidermon.jpg (38KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 480x480px

>>59045578
>low settings