Thread replies: 12
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
Anonymous
The power of Apple Inc 2017-02-20 07:24:53 Post No. 59036264
[Report] Image search: [Google]
The power of Apple Inc 2017-02-20 07:24:53 Post No. 59036264
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: c50944458d57bd7e87801b6e51941b91.jpg (37KB, 680x551px) Image search:
[Google]
37KB, 680x551px
>Apple says the world doesn't need floppy disks anymore
>the tech world kills them
>Says we need DVD's instead
>We follow them
>Later says we don't need the DVD drive anymore, and sacrifices them for thinness in laptops
>DVD's drives is now almost non existent in both laptops and desktops
>Now says we need USB C
Can Apple do it again /g/?
>>
>>59036264
no because steve jobs is dead and the company always goes to shit when hes not around
>>
>>59036290
I'd like to point out that Apple was a failure as far back as the Apple 2. The BASIC on the machine sucked, and they had to get Microsoft's version to do floating point math.
Apple got Microsoft to make applications for the initial Macs.
Apple continues to rely on Microsoft to make applications for the Mac so that they can remain competitive in the business arena.
Apple would be a dead company by now had Microsoft not bailed them out with a ton of money in the late 90's.
Apple said PowerPC was superior to x86 technology, but now they use Intel.
Apple said their OS was faster and more secure that Windows, but then they switched to unix with a flashy interface.
Seriously, Apple is run by a lunatic of a man who wants everything his way and only his way. This is why there's always been disaterously retarded hardware and software aspects over the years. One button mouse, window buttons at the top left, single file menu at the top in the day of true multitasking, etc etc etc. Apple is living in the 80's, on modern hardware.
What have we learned here? Modern-day Apples are overpriced Linux boxes with a flashy shell. The end.
>>
>>59036315
There's nothing wrong with a one-button mouse, unless you are a cripple with one arm.
>>
>>59036360
>there's nothing wrong with removing core functionality
>you just have to use two buttons for something that used to be a one-button command
inb4 you try to mention their modern one-button abortions, those things are about as ergonomic/functional as a baked potato.
>>
>>59036450
Good thing you have two hands and two arms.
>>
>>59036315
>I'd like to point out that Apple was a failure as far back as the Apple 2.
kek
try telling that to pic related
>>
>>59036504
But that still goes against the point of Apple products: making computing simpler. Thankfully, you can still plug in 3rd party USB mice and get the functionality, but you'd think that a mouse that costs 3x-4x what a normal USB mouse costs would have increased functionality.
>>
>>59036669
Pressing a key on a keyboard is such a non-event that it makes using the context menu neither simpler nor more complex than using the right mouse button.
>>
>>59036264
yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaas slay
>>
>>59036606
You're a retard.
>>
>>59036938
kek
Thread posts: 12
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2