which one is the most secure cloud ? what should i use ?

>>59033753
owncloud/nextcloud

all others are botnet

>>59033753
None, use a NASbox hooked up to a secondary router which encrypts EVERYTHING.
Hide it in a wall, and the only thing that has to poke out is the ethernet ports which you connect to your modem/primary router/whatever.

>"""""cloud"""""
>""""""secure"""""

>>59033753
>secure cloud
These two words never go together. The only way to have security on someone else's PC (which is what "the cloud" is) is to encrypt everything before uploading it.

File: 1487547988940-pol.jpg (121KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 800x800px

>>59033753
Your own file server.

>>59033799
You think you can do a better job securing a home server than IT professionals?

>>59033753
>>59033839
how can i build it then ? And can i connect it when im outside ?

>>59033839
You think you can do a better job securing a home server than IT professionals?

>>59033782
how do u prove that is secure

>>59033848
>You think you can do a better job securing your money than finance professionals?
oy vey

>>59033872
I would trust some random neet autist over some "IT professional" hack

Encrypt everything and use a free service.

>>59033893
Then youre an idiot

>>59033877
you host it yourself

free email services free cloud free blablabla... i cannot understand how they earn money if their services free ?

>>59033956
> paying for shit that is free
I guess you run an illegal trafficking ring and you need it.

>>59033753
>the most secure cloud
the nicest-smelling turd

In other words, no cloud is secure: your stuff is on someone else's hard drive.

File: thereisnocloud-v2[1].png (103KB, 1259x1259px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 1259x1259px

>>59033753
>pic related

On that note, just make your own NAS. FreeNAS or NAS4Free are great solutions, along with Nextcloud.

Google Drive because I don't sell drugs.

>>59033958
They sell your personal info to advertisers.

>>59035076
Unless its your own cloud computer.

>>59033861
Open the ports to the outside Internet

>>59033993
1. it is not expensive.
2. it is easy to setup
3. you get to control your own data.

>>59035229
As I said, I don't do human trafficking through the Guatemalan border, so I don't care if google looks at my architectural drawings.

>>59033753
Define "Cloud". You talking hosting, storage, or?...

I work for a Cloud Hosting company, and can say that shit's kept under lock and key for the most part.

>>59033861
Install Linux on some hardware (e.g. a Banana PI)
and check out some Seafile / Nextcloud tutorials.

>>59035256
I am using google drive for store pdf books, a few videos and pics right now.

>>59035242
It doesn't matter which border you use or what data you store on these services.
Unless you go full autist, people have a daemon running which syncs the data all the time on their phone, laptop and desktop.
So you constantly have someone get your location, how much your computer is on and what kind of data you are working on.
Setting up your own server is about as expensive as buying a beer in a bar.

>>59033893
>cock.li

>>59035298
is this cheapest solution ?

>>59035242
I can move Terrabytes of chinese cartoons on my NAS FOR FREE while you willingly let your data get mined by your botnet of choice

>>59035363
> being this paranoid
literally nobody gives a shit about what you do unless the police is alterted.

File: image.jpg (342KB, 1673x431px) Image search: [Google]

342KB, 1673x431px

>>59035242
die

>>59035384
back to plebbit commie

>>59035348
I'm no expert, but afaik a BananaPi is as cheap as you probably can get (don't go for a Raspberry PI for a NAS, it doesn't have SATA and it's USB is shared with Ethernet).
It definitly works fine as a server (I run a Banana pro as Seafie server), but it doesn't have some more advanced features you might want , e.g. RAID support (correct me if I'm wrong here)

You'll also need some HDD to store your files.

>>59035402

Kill yourself, he's right.

We must rage against the dying of the privacy.

>>59035384
That's a fucking blurry ass cap man.

>>59035455
10 GB is enough. And it must be fast.

>>59035402
>plebbit
>implying plebbit wouldnt be okay with censorship
back to 9gag with you

>>59033848
>IT professionals
kekt

>>59033753
Doesnt really matter. Just encrypt your shit before putting it up there and you're good.

>>59035985
is winrar enough for encryption ?

>>59033753
nextcloud on a server with full disk encryption, I setup 2TB storage for under £200 for a lifetime

>>59035672
I'd say go for a banana pi

>>59033782
This.

You set up YOUR preferred disto as server
You set up YOUR webserver
You set up YOUR database
You choose physical location of your data
You can read all the source code
You can encrypt YOUR files locally

I just switched from OneDrive to Nextcloud. It's running great. It's fast.
And FINALLY, I can switch to GNU+Lunix completely.

>>59036119
No.

>>59035242
>What is privacy
It doesn't matter what data you have as long as you no one can see it

>>59036368
don´t forget that it costs far more

>>59036119
No. At least use truecrypt or veracrypt or some shit.

>>59036437
Np actually.

Let's assume you'd have to change HDD(s) every 4 years
Let's assume your cloud provider provides you with 1TB storage for 9.99$

48x9.99$ -> 479,52$
2x1TB (RAID 1) (~100$ per drive) -> 200$

Of yourse you need to include your initial hardware costs.
Dumpy 4 core PC with 8GB RAM + RAID controller -> 300$ ?! maybe 400?!

Break even would be around 5 years

>>59035331

>implying having to maintain a computer that has to run 24/7 and never shut down for updates is that easy

>>59033896
This, what the fuck are you people smoking

>>59033753
oxymoron, there is no secure cloud