stop calling every screen resolution "p"

>>59018300
My tertiary monitor is 900i
how does that make you feel

Yeah, instead we should call them shit like "WSXGA+".

Mine is QHD+

>>59018300
P = Pixels you dumbfuck

>>59018313
I N T E R L A C E D

>>59018300
how about that's what it's called idiot

learn progressive from interlaced Luddite then post here.

or stop posting and go breed normie

>>59018328
Exactly. Or at least 1680x1050. Vertical resolution isn't specific. 1440p? Do you mean 1920x1440, 2304x1440, 2560x1440, 1800x1440, etc.?

>>59018502
16x9 is assumed with p

p brain

Discriminate against interlaced displays are we, you progressive bigot!

>>59018502
I am >>59018313
By 900 I really mean 900x1440
>>59018487
it was a shitty joke, it's not actually interlaced, just standard 10:16 monitor

>>59018509
You know what they say about assumptions.

File: 1485475675020.jpg (200KB, 1920x1280px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 1920x1280px

>>59018300

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_common_resolutions

read.

>>59018524
>>59018537

yeah, you're retarded when you doubt tech nomenclature and spec assumptions.

good saying if i do say so myself.

>>59018556
What's so difficult about being specific?
>I have an SXGA+ display
Is that really so difficult to do?

>>59018587
i have a U2412M

that's specifics

is that so difficult?

>>59018630
Retardedly too specific.

>>59018630
lol, i see you've played too much too little before.

i've met your sister as well

>>59018502
yes this has wildly outgrown the original use in the HDTV specification where 16:9 was implicit, but that's the effects of marketing for you.

File: for what purpose.jpg (66KB, 600x843px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 600x843px

>>59018537
>iPad Pro
>PAR 0.999

>>59018521
#vblanklinesmatter

>>59018300
This "p" is from pigzels.

>>59018476
P = progressive scan you dumbfuck

>early 2000s
>1600x1200 was affordable and commonplace
>2048x1536 not unheard of
>100+ hz in gaymes was the norm
>lcd tvs appear
>the day the world collectively became retarded
>everything must be FULL HD
>lets use an archaic naming scheme
>tv fags use it too so why not?
>call it 1080p60
>even though lcds dont use scan lines
>line count is literally irrelevant
>computer monitors have been progressive scan since forever
>60hz is fucking degenerate

just kill me already

>>59018809
>making jokes about a terror organization
what a shitty edgelord

>>59018487

ILNATCEERD

>>59018300
Isn't resolution p and i used when you're talking about televisions and video game consoles? That's like the only time I see those mentioned. I say my PC monitor is 1920x1080.

>>59019154
p is progressive scan and i is interlaced

>>59019140
I T R A E
N E L C D

>>59018476
Wew lad, you are stupid. Get off 4chan, you need to be above 60 IQ to be here

>>59019154
it is because it refers to the video format instead of the resolution of the screen.

And how autistic do you have to be to say the resolution of your computer out loud?

>>59018587
Knowing all these retarded abbreviations is actually less specific and useful than just writing out the resolution

>>59019244
was up

>>59019291
Writing out the resolution works too. As long as you're not going full retard and just specifying your monitor's vertical pixel count, I'm good.

>>59019244
>>59019140
>>59018487
Y'all niggas are doing it wrong

>INTERLACED
>L
>N
>A
>T
>C
>E
>E
>R
>D

>>59019420
bottom field first lad :^)

>>59019512
sir agent's bottomsfield at your service

Why can't component cables support an output with progressive scan

>>59019545
But they can. Typical TV standards do define progressive scan for specific picture formats. More likely your device has no support for that.

File: 1486960677113.png (173KB, 2688x2688px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 2688x2688px

>>59019589
If I use hdmi and set the output to 1080p the image is fine but when I use component cables at set it to 1080p there is ghosting and I have to change the output to 1080i to remove the annoying ghosting

>>59019615
So either the display is interpreting any component input as interlaced or the device outputs an interlaced picture. I think it's the former.

>>59018442
I'm LGBTQ+

>>59019420
/thread

>>59018502
or you could not be autistic

>>59019420
INTERLACED

T

R

A

E

>>59019099
fuck off you interlaced cuck
progressive scan is the master race

File: video.png (6KB, 740x314px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 740x314px

Simple.

>>59021975
>doesn't specify horizontal pixels
Trash.

>>59019260
4chan wouldn't be any fun if all the low IQs who take obvious bait left

>>59019099
Something Something IRA

>>59018300
>>59022238
I just assume everything is in God's Golden Ratio of 16:10

1200p = 1920x1200
1080p = 1728x1080
720p = 1152x720

>>59019083
>1600x1200 was affordable and commonplace

No it fucking wasn't. Very few people had 21" or larger CRTs, and 1600x1200@60 on a 19" (17.5" viewable!) screen was eye rape.
Also, we still have a couple 21" Diamondtrons at work and 1600x1200 on those looks markedly worse than 1600x1200 on our main 2190UXPs.

>2048x1536 not unheard of

You could set this resolution on some setups, but I don't know of any consumer CRT capable of 2048x1536 at more than 60Hz, almost no video card DACs and analog cables could handle that without blur, and even the finest-pitch Diamontron couldn't physically resolve that much with its aperture grille, so it was essentially unusable.

>>59022394
But it's usually in Satan's Sinful Ratio, 16:9

>>59019083
>100+ hz in gaymes was the norm

Nobody fucking cared about Hz in games back then, you just had to have 85-100 Hz refresh rate or your eyes would soon look like you've just been maced.

>>59022238
>Using anything but 16:9
ur trash

>>59022451
>using 16:9 for anything but 16:9 movies and TV shows
You're a masochist.

Nineteen hundred and twenty pixels by one-thousand and eighty pixels

>>59022505
"And" is for referring to the decimal point.

>>59022528
And... Your point is?

>>59022554
1900.2x1000.8 is a pretty damned odd resolution

File: GUESS WHAT.jpg (87KB, 498x750px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 498x750px

nHDp
qHDp
HDp
FHDp
FHD+p
QHDp / WQHDp
QHD+p
UWQHDp
UWQHD+p
4K UHDp
DCI 4Kp
5K/UHD+p
8K UHDp
QQVGAp
HQVGAp
QVGAp
WQVGAp
HVGAp
VGAp or SDp
WVGAp
FWVGAp
SVGAp
DVGAp
WSVGAp
XGAp
WXGAp
XGA+p
WXGA+p
SXGAp
SXGA+p
WSXGA+p
UXGAp
WUXGAp
QWXGAp
QXGAp
WQXGAp
QSXGAp
WQSXGAp
QUXGAp
WQUXGAp
HXGAp
WHXGAp
HSXGAp
WHSXGAp
HUXGAp
WHUXGAp

>>59018300
Why not just use megapixels? is way more informative to compare television screens, computer screens, tablets, phones, VR HMDs, and cameras.

eg: 4K=3.8 Mp, 1080p=2Mp, HTC vive=1.3Mp, etc.

aspect ratio and refresh rate are secondary measures.

>>59023138
Aspect ratio is the most important factor.

>>59023160
this, then comes ppi and actual screen size

>>59019083
4k 144hz displays with sub-5ms latency are finally starting to come out to maybe the dark times are over anon

>>59019083
>even though lcds dont use scan lines
>line count is literally irrelevant

>What are pixels and resolution

>>59023388
If it is $600 I would buy it instantly.
Otherwise I'm just going to go with 2560x1440 at 144hz instead.
Fuck 165hz.

>>59025048
line count is not nearly as important as in analog video where 10x1440 and 10000x1440 are the exact same signal.

>>59022394
>16:10
not 8:5

fucking longcount fag

>>59022404
/this

>>59022404
>even the finest-pitch Diamontron couldn't physically resolve that much with its aperture grille
that's why aperture grilles are shit.

> Before video editing
"Interlacing is just a different way of showing images! it works well for static images and logos!"

> After video editing

"Interlacing is an absolute disease, if any of my source video is interlaced I'm going to have a bad time"

>>59025341
Autism