This is a simulation of total dam collapse in California.
What software was used for this?
Or do you know of any comfy simulation software to tinker with?
gee i wonder who could be behind this post
>>59012072
An anon interested in running simulations?
t. a different guy who also wants to know.
>>59011975
floefd could do this
oh shit, that's pretty neat
I'm also interested in that software
my college professors use blender for simulating but this looks so much better
I'm sure you could do the same in Mathematica. Maybe MATLAB too but idk.
Also bumping for interest
OP here thanks for the replies guys. Keep em coming if anyone knows anything else.
>>59011975
>Or do you know of any comfy simulation software to tinker with?
http://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/
Have fun.
>>59013455
cheerleader effect is so evil holy shit
>>59015855
The cheerleader effect, also known as the group attractiveness effect, is the cognitive bias which causes people to think individuals are more attractive when they are in a group.
>>59015922
never heard of it
>>59011975
Cities: Skylines
>>59011975
probably Mathlab
>>59016211
>not draining entire areas and building cities in riverbeds
My favourite city was one where the river was dried up by the sheer quantity of water being pumped out of it- no dam. I build some shit in the riverbed and every night when the demand for water would go down, the river would flood the area, and then dry up again in the daytime.
I had a basketball court that played underwater.
>>59012072
What are you implying? I honestly have no idea. Are you accusing him of shilling for some software or something?
>>59016238
Yeah, stuff like that is usually a bunch of barely working custom scripts heaped on top of systems like Matlab.
>>59011975
GIS(geographical information system) software is used for stuff like that
>>59015922
Thanks for reminding me the name of it. I knew something like this existed, but completely forgot the term.
>>59011975
Industrial simulation isn't like consumer programs.There isn't "dam collapse simulator 2017".
As others have pointed out this was probably done in some general computation software. If it's some special software for "large scale water simulation" it probably costs 5,000$ and is only sold for business/government use.
The terrain is probably imported DEM
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_elevation_model
>>59013933
leftmost is a genuine qt
>>59017146
This.
>>59011975
Propably just elevation data and water flow scripts. Maybe in ArcMap or matlab or stuff like that.
>the water becomes lava
Scary af. I hope those people are okay.
>>59013455
>skank_party.jpg
>>59011975
hi OP why dont you use the GNU flow solver ?
It s in beta but it work very well
Have more information here basilisk.fr
>>59013069
Matlab is a "black box"
Maybe it work well but you ll never know what you actually do.
>>59017064
Wrong
See this >>59018029
>>59016424
He's implying he's a terrorist who wants to simulate the damage he can cause by bombing a dam.
>>59011975
Open Foam. You will need to know Linux, C++ programming, mesh modeling, and a strong understating of fluid physics. Good luck.
>>59013455
>http://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/?&kt=350&lat=21.3890824&lng=39.8579118&airburst=0&hob_ft=0&casualties=1&fallout=1&ff=50&zm=12
God, /pol/ will love this..
>>59011975
Basically any numerical simulation software will do.
Or just google frameworks, Universities usually develop a lot of simulation frameworks for the lulz.
>>59018100
>wrong
Op's animation isn't from your open sores shit retard.
You're obviously just one of those fags who gets triggered whenever someone uses proprietary software, and you actually think that random FOSS projects can replace anything, because you never actually do any work
>>59018893
Interesting post. Not for what it is, but for what it isn't.
>>59018893
>>59019275
That thing is ancient as shit, you 13 year old retards
>>59018183
Gee is truly smart or pajeets that they need this spelled out
>>59012072
fuck terrorists and fuck cuckfornia
>>59017064
>only sold for business/government use
Only because no one else is willing to pay $5,000.
>>59016796
prolly . arc gis or similar
>>59019687
Well yeah, pretty much. Unless you're using the program to earn money it's not worth the price to you, so the seller doesn't even bother with consumers.
That's also why you can't find it on pirate bay, unlike consumer grade software.
>>59019788
>>59016796
Those are mapping tools retards. Not simulation
>>59019823
haven't touched Arc since 2008, but IIRC there is a way to simulate. Dunno. Studied oceanography , used to do simulations like the one in OP.
>>59019168
Kek this is research lab but whatever
Your matlab obsession will lead you nowhere.
Matlab is really heavy and try to be good at everything and instead does an average final job
Id rather read article and understand the physic of the problem
Create a numerical scheme
Code it in C
Get the results and plot them with Gnuplot
Anyway, if you wanna do cfd you have to know approx the results before launching the simulation.
>>59012072
Yeah, hydrologists are evil fucks. They steal hundreds of thousands of dollars from the governent every year to calculate ground slopes and THEY GET AWAY WITH IT.
>>59011975
You can use RAS, it's made by the US corps of engineers, it's free on their website. You can probably find more hydrology maps on there too.
>>59020037
>Your matlab obsession
I never mentioned matlab
>Create a numerical scheme
>Code it in C
>Get the results and plot them with Gnuplot
Or just use software that does all that for you much faster and easier.
>buh-buh muh FOSS can do everything if you spend 10 times the effort
kys
>>59020097
I worked at a water company for a short while
I've never before in my life met anybody more passionate about groundwater than hydrologists.
>>59011975
arizona bay?