Thread replies: 10
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
Anonymous
Microkernels are slow and Elvis didn’t do no drugs 2017-02-16 05:17:47 Post No. 58973673
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Microkernels are slow and Elvis didn’t do no drugs 2017-02-16 05:17:47 Post No. 58973673
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: tumblr_inline_ni55pcgdPM1qkdr2y.jpg (8KB, 100x100px) Image search:
[Google]
8KB, 100x100px
Microkernels are slow and Elvis didn’t do no drugs
Anonymous
2017-02-16 05:17:47
Post No. 58973673
[Report]
Microkernel hatred is a peculiar phenomenon. Sheltered users who have never had any background in much beyond Windows and some flavor of free monolithic Unix, will, despite a general apathy or ignorance in the relevant subjects, have strong opinions on the allegedly dreadful performance and impracticality of “microkernels,” however they define the term (and we shall see that a lot of people have some baffling impressions of what a microkernel is supposed to be).
>>
http://blog.darknedgy.net/technology/2016/01/01/0/
>>
Microkernel rules, it rules just what it has to rule... instead of ruling everything ... I mean...
What date is today ?
>>
microkernels are actually faster than hybrid. read about seL4
>>
>>58974034
Did read a bit about seL4 (nicta papers and gernot heiser blog). It's amazing.
>>
>>58974533
If context switches can be that fast compared to Linux (seL4), why aren't systems like Minix3 or Genode getting plenty of attention?
>>
>>58974917
Nobody cares those. Use a dumbed rtos if you want speed, not a bloated CS meme.
>>
>>58976978
Dumbed RTOSs are generally shit and run everything in supervisor mode.
Capabilities are awesome. The 3rd gen of µkernels has such crazy potential.
>>
>>58973673
>>58973683
Something about that website's color combinations made it really hard to read
>>
>>58977760
Ended up throwing elinks at it. That sure helped.
Thread posts: 10
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1