GTX 1070 owners answer me this. 1080p@144Hz or 1440p@60Hz(75

1440p@~112HZ with tripple A games
1070's have more grunt than you think

>1080p
>2017

768p @ 512Hz

You won't be able to maintain the required framerate in either unless you only play assfaggots, cs go and overmeme.

GTX1080 Tri-SLI

3840x2160 @ 144hz

>>58950210
H-hey..!

File: 59.jpg (265KB, 716x2500px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 716x2500px

>>58950202
>2012+5
>60FPS

>>58950168
Gtx1080 owner here
1440p 144hz

Go 4K
Seriously
1440p was a mistake
It's marginally better looking than 1080p with 1/2 the fps.
Most AAA titles run 70fps.
Making the 144hz meaningless

File: hurrdurr.jpg (12KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 225x225px

>>58950249

I imagine if I ever wanted to go at a higher resolution for gaming it'd be 1440p.
Only retards do 4k

>>58950210
WOW. rude

>>58950168
I have a 1070 with a 1440p 144 hz and it's great. 1080p is shit for a 1070

of course not every game gets that high frames but anything over 60 is good. I get 90 or 100 on a lot of games. And the frames are shorter so the exact timing doesn't matter as much

>>58950249
>It's marginally better looking than 1080p with 1/2 the fps.

so go even more marginally better looking at 1/4 the fps? lmao

>>58950168
>not 1440p 144hz gsync

>>58950249

1440p is almost twice as much pixels as 1080p. How is that "marginally"? The jump from 1080p to 1440p is similar to 1440p to 4k. It comes down to what size monitor you want, really. 1440p at 25-27" is perfect. 4k at 27" isn't worth it. I would only use 4k at at least 32". 144hz is great. 60hz is just shit no matter what resolution.

Get a fucking 1080p@144hz monitor and see how you like it.

Get a 1440p@60hz monitor afterwards.

Experiment and see which you like better for your own personal needs.

>>58950422

look dickbag - when you're playing video games you'll notice the 100FPS much more than muh pixels

>>58950440

I'd suggesting buying the first, and renting the second one.

>>58950422

Actually going from 1440p to 1080p, and then doubling the fps, you get MUCH more pixels per second

>>58950168

1080p@144Hz is superior for video games on a GTX1070.

I'd only go to 1440p on a GTX1080.

I paired my 1070 with a 1440p 144hz monitor. It runs slighly older games at 1440p 144fps, and almost everything new at 1440p 60fps. I purposefully bough a monitor a bit above what my gpu could power so that I don't need to upgrade my monitor when I upgrade my gpu next.

>>58950602

smartest post in this shit thread

>>58950491
>renting a monitor
What?

>>58950422
>1080p-->1440p
75% improvement
>1440p--> 4k
over 200% improvement
>1080p-->4k
400% improvement

>>58950791
You do realize 4k is 2160p, right?

File: Capture.png (39KB, 660x583px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 660x583px

1440p at 144 Hz!
I like it!

>>58950602
>I purposefully bough a monitor a bit above what my gpu could power so that I don't need to upgrade my monitor when I upgrade my gpu next.
same, but I got a 4k60hz display. I can play pretty much everything 2014 or earlier at 4k on my 980ti but everything is 1440p

luckily I got a 24" monitor so the pixel density is so high I don't really see an issue with blurry pixels at non-native resolutions

File: 13530353_10208629150461606_1376126123_n.jpg (14KB, 350x392px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 350x392px

>>58950800
yes and what I said is still true and you're still retarded
>he doesn't know that monitors are rectangles

>>58950802
>alienware

>>58950837
Don't start this crap again. This is a resolution and refresh rate thread, nothing more.

>>58950802
Why are you still alive?

>>58950811
1440 to 2160 is not a 200% difference. I'd ask any schools you went to for a refund if you paid for lessons. 1080 to 2160 is a 200% difference.

>>58950845
As long as you enjoy it

File: 13522433_10208640107895535_643131236_n.jpg (28KB, 444x337px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 444x337px

>>58950850
>he STILL doesn't know how rectangles work

>>58950802
>he fell for the ayylmaoware meme

File: Capture.png (9KB, 518x126px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 518x126px

>>58950880
It's not a meme, it's a nice little system.
>>58950863
Let glorious hacker code show you the way

File: 1483646792637.gif (1MB, 431x321px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 431x321px

>>58950850
1920x1080 = 2,073,600 pixels
2560x1440 = 3,686,400 pixels
3840x2160 = 8,294,400 pixels

WEW LAD

4K 60hz

>>58950210
u can easily maintain 144fps in 1080p with a 1070 though

>>58951260

also 1440p if you're smart about tweaking your shit

>>58950899
Are you copy/pasting this into every thread that even remotely relates to it. Serious question

1440p 75hz gsync.

>>58950897
>225% difference from 1440p and 1080p

https://au.pcpartpicker.com/list/N8tJqk

>>58950249

This. Some people never consider the fact that they may not even need a 144hz. Many like myself only mainly play story driven games. Either AAA like Witcher 3, which would need a 1080 to pass 80 fps to benefit, or smaller indie games like Transistor or Paper Please which would see no benefit running at 144fps.

Not going pay all that extra cash for 144hz when the only competitive game I play is Rocket League casually.

>>58951661

>I'm a faggot

Nobody cares.

>>58950168
1080p at 60 nets you the longest possible life cycle for your card.

>>58951464
that sucks

File: gurmat.png (173KB, 349x446px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 349x446px

>>58951712

>>58951661
>Many like myself only mainly play story driven games
lmao

File: 1330051259666.jpg (21KB, 333x279px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 333x279px

>>58950209
only valid response itt

>>58951740
you are an idiot

>>58950168
>1080p@144Hz
>or
>1440p@60Hz(75 OC)

Just go 1440p@144Hz so you don't have to buy a new monitor when you upgrade your GPU in a year or 2.

>>58951735

I played CSGO, League, OW, etc. They all get boring and tedious after a few hours.

>>58951755
>Just go 1440p@144Hz

But if you want IPS, you going to have to drop at least $500.

>>58950280
Not an argument

>>58950422
1440p looks a tiny bit better, but it's not even that noticeable.
I would compare it to going from 900p to 1080p

You would think 75% ish more pixels would look far better, but it doesn't.

>>58951766
That's because most multiplayer games are shit.
If you're playing a game for it's story and not it's gameplay that's just embarrassing.

>>58951755

>year or 2

by then you'll be going into 4K territory easily

the choice basically stems down to whether OP prefers framerate or resolution

personally there's absolutely nothing wrong with 1440p@60Hz+IPS for general video game use if you're not a Competitive MLG MLP fan

Sacrificing 100+ FPS for image quality you'll barely notice is retarded.

Just sayin', once you regularly play vidya above 100+fps, you'll never go back to 60.

>>58951661
Witcher 3 is an exception, most brand new AAA games run at near 90fps at 1440p in my 1070 on high/max settings
I know doom averages 100-120 on ultra, Dirt Rally is 120+ Forza is 80, Fallout 4 is 90-100
And each one is damn worth it

>>58950168
>Falling for the 144Hz meme

>>58951509
>>58951509
No that's from 1440p to 2160p. You're literally blind

>>58951777
But if youdon't????
?????????
Is that a thing??

>>58951421
No pulled up my trusty windows 10 calculator and typed it myself

I hope it's pasta there's nothing more satisfying on 4chan than a retard being publicly shamed

>>58951919
>1440 to 2160 is not a 200% difference, 1080 to 2160 is

>>58951933
You're completely unable to follow a conversation, even when one of the posters is a name fag. Damn dude you're retarded.

>>58951903
Which setting should I lower when playing modern game on 1070s?

>>58951821
>If you're playing a game for it's story and not it's gameplay

Gameplay is always first. Just finished by by flame. People everywhere hated nearly everything about it. True, the story wasn't great, but the gameplay was great for me. Going through Technomancer now, same deal.

File: image.jpg (981KB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]

981KB, 2448x3264px

>>58951943
The ones that impact performance the most and affect quality the least

>>58951821
>>58951958
>Just finished Bound by Flame

>>58951943
It doesn't matter in my opinion, you don't have to go below high and you don't have to lower more than a few settings.
Just lower a few settings you're fine with lowering, things like texturing (usually a VRAM thing), draw distance and anti ailiasing tend to affect GPU performance by a lot

>>58950168
>1080p@144Hz

this

1440p is a shitty meme.

>>58950168
144Hz is fucking tits, it will feel like your cursor is slathered in lube

File: 1484504087703.png (150KB, 404x334px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 404x334px

Lowering or turning off settings like AO for 1440p @ 120hz with ulmb.
Looks better than 165hz with Gsync on my monitor

>>58951260
Yeah, on medium-high settings and no AA, shill.

>>58951747
you are an mad

>>58950168
Pixio 1440p 144hz IPS freesync display or 4k 60hz IPS freesync, then upgrade to Vega, nvidia has no competing G-sync displays

>>58952110
Yet AMD has nothing that will play a single game at 1440p 144fps

>>58952110

>buying Freesync for an nVidia card
>Vega
>upgrade

shill harder

>>58952110
G-sync was literally on both of those display types first

>>58952123
And you need a Titan xp to run that or 4k what's your point?

>>58952129
Its like 600 for a 27" 1440p 144hz IPS Gsync display, and it was $800 for 4k gsync last I checked

>>58952124
He wasnt supposed to buy an nvidia card in the first place due to the increased monitor prices

>>58950168
I would take the 1440p, but not overclock its refresh rate. OCing refresh rates, at least in my experience, generally lead to image quality reduction.

What are you playing?

If fps's or platformers then get 144Hz, else the 60Hz should be fine.

Not a single person proved they owned a 1070
>>58950802
That's a 1080 you fucking retard.

>>58951933
1080p to 2160p is a 400% increase anon

>>58950850
>1440 to 2160 is not a 200% difference
are you actually fucking stupid?

>>58950168

Get a 1440p@100-144Hz.

My 1070 is paired with an i7-7700K, and I can run modern games on High at over 100FPS fine. I can actually hit the 140 mark on older games from around 2012.

>>58952286
Newer games such as?

If you've never experienced 1440p, it's not a big deal. You'll barely noticed the difference between that and 1080p when you're playing a game. The frame jump from 60 to 100+ is MUCH more noticeable in single player and multiplayer games.

Also if you just run a 1070@1080p, you're elongating the card's life, as you won't have to overclock at all.

>>58950168
>Which is superior overall?
What are you going to be doing with it? Shooters and fast paced gameplay or watching movies in 100+ fps looks fantastic. Although 1440p is pretty scenic looking, but it's not an even step from 1080 to 2160 so it's usually easier to find 1920•1080p or 3840•2160p quality videos/games/wall papers. That's not to say 1440 is a waste, it's just less memed than 4k is.

Go for the 144hz, 1080p in "du current yeer" is just a joke since 4k is available but can't do 60+hz well and anons want to justify paying for 4k but running shit below 60fps.

>>58952365


you also won't have to blow your load on a monitor as 1080p's with gsync are much cheaper

File: stop.png (81KB, 297x326px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 297x326px

>>58950202
>the next prime number after 2011
>60Hz

>>58950168

ausfag here

just got this

https://www.newegg.com/global/au/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824160226&cm_re=g2460Pg-_-24-160-226-_-Product

>>58952407
How many kangs did you kill to earn enough dollaroos to buy this?

>>58952262
>implying it is a 200% difference

please show your working

1070 owner here.

1440p@60.

Hz dick measuring is a meme. Don't fall for it

>>58952471
What games do you play

>>58951927
Word for word, number for number in other threads. hmm

>>58952471

It's really not a meme if you play fast paced games, there's a very noticeable difference.

>>58952365
You cannot be serious

Cards running 150fps+ overheat and spaz out
Cards running ultra at 60fps run far cooler and quieter

>>58952156
I said a SINGLE game
8/10 games in the last 2 years will hit 144fps on 1440p with a 1070
Or maybe someone is willing to lower settings all the way down to "high" and then still hit 144fps on 9/10 games
Pull out a fury X or whatever and even then it struggles to find a single game it even has a chance of running at that level

>>58952232
Exactly, so the man inside of the meme arrow is retarded

>>58950168
3440x1440 :^)

Also don't oc your monitors, especially IPS ones.

>>58952471
My dick expands and contracts to work great anywhere from 15-144fps
I like my dick, fuck off with your static miniscule dick

>>58953173
>He fell for the 4K ultrashort meme

>>58952407
Get your shit together Australia, the free-sync version should cost significantly less
https://au.pcpartpicker.com/product/ZBZ2FT/aoc-monitor-g2460pf

>>58952471
Sure Hz dickwaving is dumb, but there's a minimum if you're aiming to please
60hz just can't pleasure like 100hz+ can it's not about showing off to other people it's about pleasuring yourself

>>58953153
Gamers Nexus recently did a high refresh rate build, the 1080 here struggles to hit 1440p 144fps, you'd be better off with dual 480s at 1400mhz in some cases compared to a 1070 at around the same price

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPenffZ15DU

File: image.jpg (18KB, 500x265px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 500x265px

>>58953213
So why even post it?

>>58953191
Literally same amount of vertical pixels. Please don't meme spout.

>>58953244
For the price listed?

in the US it's about $200 for a free-sync 1080p 144hz TN display, $350 for G-sync

>>58953243
Ok
My 1070 is still doing great at 1440p 144hz, hits 60 minimum in Witcher, 90 minimum in every other game and 144fps fairly often
And THEN I turn the settings down to high, and basically every game becomes high-fps ready
Except Witcher
Witcher has its own thing going on

>>58953250
Okay but he's not there he's in australia
>>58953243
Are you actually recommending crossfire for gaymen?

>>58953243
Well if gsync is always on the best panels before then it shouldn't be a problem what monitor he gets, he doesn't have to hit 144fps with gsync

>>58953258
But you could hit fairly high frame rates with an OC'd 8GB RX 480 if you optimized your settings there for half the price, and you still have the superior performance per dollar display in the Pixio 1440p 144hz IPS free-sync display

https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIAB714894154

>>58953290
my issue there is the price, for roughly $400 less, you OC a 480, and get that pixio display, and you got like 70% of the performance in the GPU and still get free-sync

>>58953271
Not exactly, I can almost recommend RX 480 crossfire due to it's cost, Pretty much only Ashes and Black Ops 3 have really good scalling with multi-GPU though, its not too bad though in most games

going to be better with non reference cards naturally

a fair amount of the time it's going to be faster than the 1070 though

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVVJPbFRDEc&t=1s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4D3UKBRA_w

>>58953301
Crossfire and SLI is fucking shit, has horrible support, stutters and basically breaks various games if its not ready
It's a total retard options for people who have never used it and think it looks cool or that they're getting a better price by buying two brand new fucking gpus instead of one

>>58953301
A 480 can't even do 1440p 60fps maxed, how is it gonna rival 120-144fps at even minimum settings?
And mgpu in general is shit, wait for it to either take off or die because right now it's not particularly useful or thrifty unless you already have a shit old card you can't sell

>>58953328
But you do get more performance in some games with 2 480s vs a single 1070, and I've seen a 480 go for sale down to $170

>>58953345
I said an OC'd 480 with optimized settings can hit high fps at 1440p, would end up being a mix of medium-high with low shadows in most games

You could run DOOM that fast potentially, a 480 can run it at 4k medium-high using Vulkan

Resident Evil 7 hits 80fps average on the 480 here, with really high settings

https://youtu.be/WZnqylCw9ng?t=369

>>58950230
Pascal doesn't support Tri-SLI
0/10 bait

>>58953386
I can run doom at 1440p 120-144hz on ultra (nightmare drops it to 90ish) with my 1070

>>58953407
1080p, Nightmare settings, 144fps solid with a 1070

2560x1600 @ 60hz easy
on a 970
Get your overclocking game together 1070 owner(s)

3440 x 1440 @ 75hz VA is the new ideal display in 2017. I personally look for forward to 3840x1600 @ 75hz+ AdobeRGB or better with Freesync at affordable prices.

File: image.jpg (34KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 600x600px

>>58953389
Have you TRIed it?

>>58950168

1080p@144Hz+Gsync

>>58953712

This

>>58953645

...fuck off Carlito

>>58952511
>Math is exactly the same every time you do it
WHOA

>>58950168
Both: 1440p@144Hz

>>58953389
Yes it does you monumentally retarded baby.

Supporting, and having drivers tailored to 3-way SLI are two different things.

File: doaflip.gif (539KB, 400x346px) Image search: [Google]

539KB, 400x346px

>>58950202
>>58950239
>>58952393
>tfw sitting with a gtx 960
>old tv as monitor¨
>60Hz
>720p
welp

Gaming should have never left 600p@60Hz

>>58950850
>1080 to 2160 is a 200% difference.
lmao no, it's a 400% difference.

>>58955430
No, it actually doesn't support 3-way SLI. Trying to run 3-way SLI with Pascal cards will cause things to break: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCCEBfoUUPU

>>58951777
Might as well add some gsync meme into it then

>>58956348
Seriously, some people are so retarded they don't know how rectangles work. I highly suspect these people are actual 9th graders who haven't taken geometry yet

File: 1423856729995.jpg (22KB, 439x374px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 439x374px

>not a single word about 240hz meme monitors
Am I the only one interested in this?
I've felt jump from 60 to 144, and assume it's only going to get better

>>58956348
>1080p
too bad your 4k monitor is only 10% bigger than your old 1080p one

>>58951777
trips have spoken the truth

Im 1440p 144hz (gsync)with 1080s in sli. I am waiting for the new asus 4k 144hz to come out this year.

>>58956475
There are like 0 games that you can run on 240fps anyway so what's the point?
inb4 esport shit

>>58956475
Anything above 120 is placebo. There I said it. You can't tell the difference between 144 and 120

>>58955411
No down to the exact wew lad, exact spacing in everything smartass