Why did the P2P revolution never come?

>>58931759
Because most computer users (with computer I mean all kinds of computers, from desktop PCs to smartphones) are normalfags and for them
-steaming music is easier than downloading it from DC++
-steaming movies is easier than downloading them from torrent
-letting fagbook chat a whatsgoy handle communication is easier than using a chat program separate from the social network, or god forgive multiple programs because some of them are better for chat and some are better for video/voice calls
-letting blogspot/similar sites host your webpage is easier than setting up a zeronet site

>>58931759
But it did. It serves as the one and only way for distributed applications such as for example filesharing and blockchains.

If you are referring to the current state of centralized systems and the web, its because businesses have chosen the most profitable option, not becuase the tech isn't there.

>>58931759
Because it sucks big ol' dongle and is painful for administration.

It's big for games.

>>58931759
Literally botnet

>>58931856
>filesharing
Neckbeards sharing anime episodes and linux distros

>blockchains
money laundering and pyramid schemes

>>58931953
>these answers are wrong because of what they represent isn't to my liking

They are excellent examples of this tech with huge success.

>>58932013
But they didn't revolutionize anything. They're just very niche use cases for very niche people.

>>58932177
but it did revolutionize file-sharing and decentralized applications, DHT is a godsend. Also VoIP and gaming (for better or worse).

For normies many of the improvements might not be as visible, but they sure are there.