Is he right /g/

>>58931225
basically

You must be way too americanized to question his words.

>>58931225
Shills shilling shills shilling shills shilling shills shilling shills. It's shills all the way down.

>>58931225
tl;dr

>>58932767
shill

the world isn't the giant james bond good v evil spy network you wish it was. sorry to break it to you, but no amount of conspiracy will mask the futility and dullness of your life

>>58932832
shill spotted.

basically a TED talk

>Here's a horrible problem that's ruining your everyday life that WE NEED TO FIX THIS
>how uh idk i'm just here to show you the problem and be recognized for it

why do people act like organized shilling isn't a thing

shareblue exists, here's their handbook https://www.scribd.com/document/337535680/Full-David-Brock-Confidential-Memo-On-Fighting-Trump#from_embed

>>58932853
counter-shill

>>58932911
>why do people act like organized shilling isn't a thing

People acting like that are shills

I've been thinking about it, and it seems like the only way to end shilling once and for all is to assign every human an ID that they use to get online.

We could have two internets, one filled with shills and one with IDs.

At first, I didn't think the governments would let them co-exist, they would just shut down shill net to prevent anonymous posting aka "terrorism". Then I realized capitalists can still exploit the shill net and that people would still want to go there to troll or ask personal questions online that they don't want associated with their ID and would wade through the obvious shilling.

Is there a better way? Should we just live with the shilling? Should we pray for nuclear winter to kill us all?

>>58932870
knowing it exists is basically enough
just listen to people you know and be more wary of those that you don't

people that grew up on the internet in the mid 90s know this

people that have only adopted the internet recently don't