Old GPUs thread

I'm still rocking the HD5870 from 7 years ago.

File: reeeeeeeee.png (35KB, 805x539px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 805x539px

yeah

File: 1321324546.png (95KB, 828x606px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 828x606px

>>58907168

File: file.png (185KB, 935x1006px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 935x1006px

Old enough?

>71c

Holy shit

File: gtx 570.jpg (7KB, 277x182px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 277x182px

>"Anon, I'm old!"

File: Screenshot at Feb 11 22-51-45.png (124KB, 817x203px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 817x203px

>>58907168
Mini Fermi fireball coming trough

File: specs.png (37KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 800x600px

actual old shit coming through

>>58908139

eh, you're just a good value at 40 bucks.

now do i need to go pull out the RAGE 128?

>>58908232
I honestly wonder if something like a dual Pentium III build with a Geforce 256 and 2gb of ram can still be used to shitpost on

File: IMG_5197.jpg (4MB, 2448x2448px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2448x2448px

Am I old enough?

>>58908346
Have a Tualeron 1.3 with chipset graphics and 128 MB Ram WinXP hiding in the basement shitposts no problem.

>Dual P3
>Geforce 256
>Late 90's
>2GB of fucking ram

Newfag?

File: ss (2016-12-15 at 10.45.13).png (33KB, 647x473px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 647x473px

>>58907192

File: IMG_1671.jpg (218KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

218KB, 1000x750px

>1.25mb Neomagic MagicGraph128ZV

We obscure gpu now

>>58908760
Was just curious since my 1.3ghz Celeron box with 256mb ram and a geforce4 card just grinds to a halt on Windows 2000 when you run any web browser worth using, it immediately starts writing to the page file.

>>58908872
Youd have to use IE or navigator/netscape
Firefox is just too much for under 512mb of ram
Shit eats up 250mb with one tab on my xp shitbox

To think i use to browse this site on 64mb of ram
Danm